×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Nails and Horizontal Shear

Nails and Horizontal Shear

Nails and Horizontal Shear

(OP)
In the APA Table for Recommended Shear for Horizontal APA Panel Diaphragms ..., we are only allowed to specify 10d nails at adjoining panels if the framing is 3" nominal.

Does anybody use 3" nominal framing?

Are there alternatives?  

Are there more current APA table?

Is there revised information on fasteners such as those with a ringed shank that may have greater pull-out values?

Any increase factors for fasteners applied with air guns?

Thank you!

RE: Nails and Horizontal Shear

3" nominal width in framing is common.

Correct me if I am wrong, but I do believe it is correct to interpet this requirement as 3" nominal in width, or 2 1/2". If you use a 2 x 4 flatwise, that gives you a 3 1/2" wide nailing surface. Similarly, I-joist products typically provide a nailing surface that is at least 2 1/2" wide.

Try contacting Trus Joist MacMillian.

No, APA does not currently provide an alternative to this requirement. Yes, using a different type of fastener would have some effect upon the panel's performance; however, remember that these tabulated values are based upon lab test results. Any variance from the parameters of these lab tests with the intent to obtain better design values could only be accepted if proven by another lab test. So, yes, go ahead and use wood screws, etc., but you cannot convince any plan checker that screws provide a better value than what's shown in the table for nails. (any way you look at it, you're "screwed" -- just kidding!)

Be careful in specifing the use of air guns for nail placement. Be sure that the air pressure in the gun is restricted such that the result is no more than if you used a conventional hand-held hammer. We do not want to allow the nail head to penetrate the top ply of the plywood any more than would occur with a hand-hammer.

Another thought: look into the actual size of the "10d nail" used in the nail gun -- it likely is not the same as the conventional 10d nail. However, it is often considered an acceptable substitute.

Enough said?

-Richard L. Flower, P. E.

RE: Nails and Horizontal Shear

The proper nail is a 10D short (2 1/4"), the framing members must be a nominal 3" width (2 1/2" dressed). 3" members are only required if the nailing schedule is 3" o.c. or closer with 10D nails. 8D nails are allowed for 3" nailing into 2X. When the need arises for blocked diaphragms with 2", 2 1/2" or 3" o.c. nailing w/ 10D nails I usually specify 4x members, this is pretty common for flexible diaphragms (such as concrete shear walls and wood roof diaphragm. NOTE: 2x4's flat are not allowed.
In the case of trusses with 2X cords it is permissable to double up the cords, however, the nailing for the scab must be checked.
You may use 10D nails if the spacing is 4" o.c. ore further.
For more information on this see UBC97 Table 23-II-H page 2-287

RE: Nails and Horizontal Shear

(OP)
ERV,

How do you know the "proper nail is a 10D short (2 1/4")"?
Where is this stated?

Thank you!

RE: Nails and Horizontal Shear

EIT2,

Experience. A 10D common nail is 3" long and as such tends to split lumber regardless of 3X members. The code (IBC or UBC) requires 1 5/8" penetration into main members, given 5/8" sheathing a 2 1/4" nail provides the required penetration.

RE: Nails and Horizontal Shear

my exp is that 3" is not normal framing".  Typically 2 by xx is used.  

RE: Nails and Horizontal Shear

Sometimes you will get a really picky plans checker for the local jurisdiction that insists that double 2x is not per code and that single 3" nominal material is required. Since you usually can't buy 3" nominal treated boards for sill plates or for the edge boards on your highly loaded shear planels you end up using 4x for framing materials and sill plates.   Often these same picky plans examiners authorize aternate braced wall panel designs issued by their office that use double 2x for the sill plates and panel nail edge boards.  They don't have a good explanation as to why that is allowed in their alternate braced wall panel and not in an engineered shear wall.  The fun of dealing with government.

RE: Nails and Horizontal Shear

The problem with using 2X's doubled up is this:

If panels edges occur on a doubled up member, and 10D nailing is specified, lets say @ 3" o.c., then the doubled up member would probably have to be nailed to each other somewhere close to the same schedule in order to keep them from pulling apart. This will most likely detroy the integrity of the two members. This amount of nailing is certainly not allowed by NSD.

3X members are specified to eleviate splitting of the member thereby keeping the integrity of the member.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources