×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

to avoid singularity in shell to solid

to avoid singularity in shell to solid

to avoid singularity in shell to solid

(OP)
The issue about handling shell to solid connection came up in this forum a quite few times and understand that this is because of stiffness matrix being singular.
Could someone explain what exactly causes matrixt to be singular and how the use of MPC prevent this from happening?

RE: to avoid singularity in shell to solid

Solids use three degrees of freedom per node (the translational ones). But because they have no thickness, shells usually have to use five (three translations and two out of plane rotations). So there are inevitably unconnected degrees of freedom (the rotational ones) at the joint. There are various ways of handling this. You can simply discard the unused rotational degrees of freedom, which can be done automatically but is likely to lead to gross errors in many cases. Another method is to use extra shell elements superimposed on the surface of the solids and couple the shells to those. And as you say, you can use multi-point constraints to couple the rotational degrees of freedom to the translational degrees of freedom of the solid nodes. There are various algorithms that people have developed for doing this. See for example :
http://www.mscsoftware.com/support/online_ex/Patran/Pat...
There are now special coupling elements which do this automatically, and I believe some of the latest FEMAP and/or Nastran programs have this capability. I've always got away with using the extra shell element method, but it's not as accurate as using MPC's in critical cases.

RE: to avoid singularity in shell to solid

In ABAQUS you simply click on the edge of the shell part, then the face of the solid part, and use shell to solid coupling.  ABAQUS automatically generates a distributed coupling based on the thickness specified in your shell section in order to properly distribute the moments.  

You don't want to embed the shell in the solid because you are artificially stiffening the structure.  Likewise, you have to be very careful if you are going to try and write multipoint constraints or equations to do this.  You need a distributed flexible coupling which transfers the momements.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources