×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

H2 from seawater
7

H2 from seawater

H2 from seawater

(OP)
Why can't you place two electrodes in seawater, place a voltage source across the electrodes and produce hydrogen and oxygen?

RE: H2 from seawater

You can. You are using rather expensive electricity, probably got by burning fossil fuels to do so.

You now have two large containers full of gas. What are you going to do with them?

Cheers

Greg Locock

RE: H2 from seawater

2
not sure if it is that easy, I know statements like electrolysis of water is 70% efficent are made but I think that is when they add efficent electrolyte(Ionic matter of some sort aka salt). Not sure what the ratings are for our ocean salt?? it maybe that if you don't make any changes to the compisition of ocean water the electrolysis process ain't very efficent. but really don't know?? I might found out tomorrow at hydrogen symposium ;O) as for what to do with it it does seem some poeple have found applications.

Australia is going to use relaibale tidal energy of the kimberly region to produce hydrogen via electrolysis of sea water for use into natural gas supply. apparently adding up to 10% hydrogen by Vol% will have no effect on the pipes etc currently used to supply hydrogen. And will emite a hell of a lot less emissions.

It is futher suggested that this hydrogen maybe removed from the piping system at point of end use for collection. giving the fuel cell vechiles and other hydrogen technologies an efficent infrustructure to begin with.
here is a link.

http://www.hydrogen.org.au/hydrogen-news-ed.5.htm

Mark ;O)

RE: H2 from seawater

2
The issue with water electrolysis is not generally the source of the water- it's the source of the energy to drive the electrolysis.  The electrolyte is not consumed, so you choose its composition and concentration to maximize the efficiency of the electrolysis process.  I guess if all you've got is seawater...but there are easier electrolytes to work with than the mixed bag that's in seawater.

There are plans of the sort Mark is describing to use remote or off-peak electrical generation capacity to electrolyze water to generate hydrogen to power fuelcells. In areas where power transmission lines don't exist but natural gas pipelines do, perhaps this "hythane" blending into an existing natural gas grid is an option.  Neither long transmission lines nor hydrogen generation/reconversion to electricity by fuelcells are as efficient as local use of the electricity, but if the power source is renewable (like tidal), it's all good.

RE: H2 from seawater

(OP)
Thanks everyone great responces.  I live in the Puget Sound area of Washington state.  There are lots of tide flow opportunities here.  My thoughts are to use some form of tidal generator(s) to produce electricity when peak tide flow corrisponds with peak electricity demands.  Use the tidal generators for hydrogen production when the peak tide flow is not in-line with peak electricity demands.  The hydrogen is stored for generating electricity during peak electrical demand.  Does anyone know of this type of application in use today?  

RE: H2 from seawater

Electrolysis w/hydrogen storage and a fuelcell are definitely being considered for load-balancing applications like the sort you're describing- IMHO they have much more of a chance to be used in this type of application than in transporation.  Each step (electrolysis, H2 storage and the fuelcell) loses some of the power you generated in the first place, so it's not perfect, and the capital costs of all three steps are far from negligible- but these applications can maximize our use of off-peak renewable power.  Other means such as flywheels and even pumping water back up-hill at hydroelectric dams are also used to "store" off-peak power.

RE: H2 from seawater

Why on earth would you not use a barrage to even out the water flow, rather than incurring two rather lossy chemical conversions?

Cheers

Greg Locock

RE: H2 from seawater

My chemistry book says that when you electrolyse fairly concentrated aqueous solutions of chlorides, chlorine is discharged at the anode rather than oxygen. For brine the liquid tends to change into caustic soda.

HAZOP at www.curryhydrocarbons.ca

RE: H2 from seawater

(OP)
Greglocock: My thougts behind the use of a tidal stream generator is to minimize the "foot print" of the generation equipment.

owg: Two questions on caustic soda.  Is there a commercial market for caustic soda?  If the hydrogern production equipment is located such that the two electrodes were emersed in the ocean with a "jar" to collect the hydrogen, would the amount of caustic soda produced be environmentaly significant?

 

RE: H2 from seawater

Electrolyze seawater in an "open" cell, and you'll get chlorine/hypochlorite/chlorate.  If you want caustic and chlorine, you have to keep the two from mixing using a membrane cell.  But sea salt isn't pure sodium chloride, and that will impair the value of the product caustic.  If you want hydrogen and oxygen, you'll need a different electrolyte.

But you're on the right track- better to use the power locally than to try to distribute and/or store it.

RE: H2 from seawater

(OP)
moltenmetal:  If I understand you, to get hydrogen & oxygen from seawater I would first need to purify the sea water and then add an electrolyte.  How pure would the seawater need to be and what kind of electrolyte would be added?

In addition to using the power locally (at the generator to produce H2 & O2), I am looking at the cost per foot of undersea electrical cable vs pipe.

RE: H2 from seawater

thorangle - Sorry I don't know the answers to your questions. I suppose the environmental assessment will look into that.

HAZOP at www.curryhydrocarbons.ca

RE: H2 from seawater

The electrolyte won't be consumed.  So- solar 'still the water and add it to the electrolyzer on a continuous basis as you produce oxygen and hydrogen.  Purity will be good enough.  Pretty ungainly, though.  Or use some of your product electricity to run an RO system- not as environmentally elegant, but since you can return the brine to the sea, probably not too expensive to run either.

RE: H2 from seawater

(OP)
moltenmetal:  Too many cloudy days in the Puget Sound area for a solar still to be effective.  However, the RO system sounds interesting.  I wonder how sensitive the RO equipment would be to the cyclical nature of a tidal stream generator?  How much "care and feeding" do RO systems require?  

RE: H2 from seawater

how to increase the rates of Hydrogen Evolution from Water?
Photocatalytic materials ?

RE: H2 from seawater

(OP)
k4lan,
I am not sure what you are asking.

RE: H2 from seawater

I think it is a rhetorical question. He might be thinking like I do?? the refining of noble metals etc to be made into photocatalytic materials might not be the right way to go about a hydrogen economy. As first we must dig a dirty big hole in the ground (expenditure of energy) and then refine the metal shape it etc. Are you aware it takes 7 tonnes of ore to yeild 32gms of platinum and it takes 6 months to refine!! hence Why I started the thread "Sodium from ocean salt for generation of hydrogen"
Thread804-80670

Maybe it is possible to avoid the noble metals etc in this process.

RE: H2 from seawater

(OP)
OK,I will admit my ignorance of photocatalytic materials, and platinum production.  I was/am interested in the possibilities of using ocean tide streams to generate electricity.  Since tide flows are cyclical and often do not corrispond to peak electricity demands, I was also interested in using the off-peak electricity to produce a "storable" form of energy.  Hydrogen from the electrolysis of sea water appeared to be a reasonably mature technological possibility.

How are photocatalytic materials involved in this hypothetical hydrogen production scheme?

RE: H2 from seawater

Your concept of using tidal energy to generate hydrogen to generate power results in two large inefficiencies:

>  when youconvert to hydrogen
>  when you convert back

whereas, a direct storage of the electrical energy in super caps or the like would result in a minor inefficiency.

TTFN

RE: H2 from seawater

(OP)
I agree that the production of hydrogen and the subsequent use of hydrogen to produce electricity are inefficent.  However, all thermal power cycles share the same/similare ineffciencies.  If one then compares the effcientcies associated with the production, transport, and storage of the hydrogen versus other forms of energy storage,  I believe that hydrogen production from tidal stream generators (free energy source) compares rather favarably. The inductrial technology to acomplish this is in existance and use today.

Question:  Can super caps be manufactured and configured to store thousands of mega-watt-hours worth of electrical energy?  Assuming that super caps can be manufactured and configured to store that much electrical energy, an economic evaluation would be interesting.

 

RE: H2 from seawater

Unclear, supercaps are still in their infancy.

I would further argue that transporting anything material or physical is another loser in the overall system efficiency.  How is that more efficient than using power lines?  

How many trucks does it take to transport "thousands of megawatt-hrs" of energy?

TTFN

RE: H2 from seawater

(OP)
Power lines are not with out losses.  In fact, transporting hydrogen via pipeline is more effcient (less energy lost) than transmitting electricity via transmission lines for distances over approximatly 200 miles.  The exact distance escapes me, the point is that over realtivily short distances (several hundred miles) the transportation of hydrogen is economical.  With electrical transmission you have transformer losses at the generation stepup transformer, line losses from I^2R, and several stepdown transformer losses.  Hydrogen gas transport via pipe line incounters pipeline friction losses and compressor station losses.  

Trucking is not required (an option to remote areas), the natural gas pipeline infastructure is already in place.  Utilities in Austraila are experimenting with mixing hydrogen and natural gas, and delivering that mixture, via pipelines to their customers, both residential and commercial.  

RE: H2 from seawater

thorangle,

my words excatly, except 200 miles is not a long distance and power lines would be used to. The problem 9 times out of ten with useing renewable energy like tidal energy etc. is that the renewable energy energy source is no where near a in place grid system thus by the time you install the power lines etc and power systyem that can cope with major fluctuations with the power generated then, you find that most of the energy does not make it to it's useful point of end use. that is where hydrogen comes in it can be piped 1000kms with minimal loss and essential is storing 100'sMWhours as it runs down the pipe

RE: H2 from seawater

You've forgotten about one of the major losses of high voltage transmission lines:  radiation of the energy off into space via the generation of radio waves.

Hydrogen transportation in a pipeline isn't the main loss in hydrogen as a storage medium for energy.  Rather, the main energy losses are in making the hydrogen, and then in compressing the hydrogen up to a pressure which makes pipeline transportation economical, and then in the fuelcell (provided you can afford it!).  If the route is to make electricity from tidal energy, then make hydrogen from it to make it cheaper to transport to destination, I'd say you're off your tree.  If the goal is the storage of off-peak generation energy, that's a different story, because there are so few alternatives for energy storage.

I'd wager that the capital cost differences between building an electrical transmission line and a high pressure hydrogen pipeline are not insignificant either, with electricity being the clear winner on that front.

The best use would be to generate some electricity-intensive product nearby- aluminum, say.  That would permit you to "transport" the energy without so many losses, while displacing product which is made by more conventional means.

RE: H2 from seawater

Regarding distributing hydrogen by pipeline, if the existing infrastructure for natural gas is to be used, there will be problems with hydrogen embrittlement unless the pipelines are replaced/upgraded.  Depends on what those pipelines were made of.

RE: H2 from seawater

Molten:

When hydrogen produced from electrolysis it is possible to have the hydrogen bubble off at high pressure by placing the electrodes at a water depth, using nat gas pipeline for example, often at 400kpa then this pressure can be acheived in lass than 10M of water. no need for loss of compresson if a long distance is necessary than a larger water depth to begin with can be used. I am unaware of a reduction in electrolysis efficency at depth.

If the hydrogen is to be then used to generate electricity it can be used as a fuel in a conventional Internal combustion engine at high efficency, if the engine's fuel/air mixture is leaned out to equivelence ratio 2.5 engine efficency often is above 40% (ford model U recently realised 38% brake eff). These in turn can turn a generator. At equivelence ratio of 2.5 and above then no NOx is produced, no need for a catalytic convertor

Hydrogen Internal combustion charistics are coming along now. With many benifits of hydrogen addition into even the highly polluting desiel and petrol engines with increases in brake efficency, lower HC , lower CO, lower Co2, lower N0x, thus reduces running cost and good for environment and this set to save the bus companies millions in fuel costs.

Have you heard of the air car? it runs of compressed air. www.theaircar.com . I meantion it because the compression of hydrogen is a major issue and it shows that the compression energy in hydrogen tank could also be utilised by a correctly designed engine! and hence drive further again.

cost of powerlines coming down because of bad weather hence snow storms or cyclones are a major issue and in countries where these occur regularly most residents don't depend on electricity gas is everywhere because of it realability in such a situation. Hydrogen well ahead there simply because of realiability.

Molten I don't understand this:

The best use would be to generate some electricity-intensive product nearby- aluminum, say.  That would permit you to "transport" the energy without so many losses, while displacing product which is made by more conventional means.

Celebur

certainly does depend on the pipelines. pipes in aussie have shown 10% vol is safe while it might be possible to reach 20% by vol no need for upgrade etc.

RE: H2 from seawater

I'm going to jump in here - as the manufacture and patent holder of various EC applications - it does not take much to change sea water or any other aqueous solution where sodium chloride is present - into hyperchloric acid - the voltage is small - try like the voltage level of the batteries in your flashlight - so it does not take much soalr produced DC voltage to start the reaction - however, as simply a soure of hydrogen gas - it takes greater voltage to get any economic value of such a treatment - so I think you should look at the process different - such as can the hydrochloric acid be created, then added to another "product" to create an explosion - much like a combustion engine used gasoline - this then would make more sense, especially if the resultant gases/by-product of the explosion is a harmless gas/vapor.

If using an acid - is one better then the other for such a combination - EC can create phosphoric acid, nitric acid, carbolic acid, etc. - so the solution may not be "hydrogen fuel cells" but an acid reaction fuel cell using sea water as the "crude" source.

The other point - sea water is not pure - you have heavy metals, phosphates, carbonates, and other "impurities" that may have to be removed or accounted for in the reaction.

Dave Orlebeke/Aquatic Technologies

RE: H2 from seawater

(OP)
My original question had to do with; what to do with off-peak electrical power produced from a tide stream generator.  Given that tidal flows are very predictable (especial comparied to other forms of alternative energy) but frequently will not match up with peak electrical requirements.

Transmission capital costs:
Given that the generators would be located off shore.  I have been told by a colleague of mine, that the cost of installing undersea cable or pipe line is in the equipment to do the job, not the actual cable or pipeline.  My colleague assures me that for the undersea segment of these "transmission facilities" the cost is approximatly the same.  Once on shore, then I believe the electrical transmission line may be cheaper.  

Assuming that capital cost are the same to get the energy commodity to shore,  what are some thoughts about hydrogen production on shore at one larger facility versus hydrogen production equipment located at each tidal stream generator?

Generator voltages:
A typical AC generator produces electricity in the 13-15 KV range.  (FYI, This is typically close to the voltage range selected for ditributing electrical power in suburban areas.)  I suppose the generator could be manufactured to produce a voltage idealy suited for hydrogen electrolysis.  What is the ideal voltage for hydrogen electrolysis?

RE: H2 from seawater

DC voltage is the proper type - any voltage ove 2.41vDC will "split" the hydrogen-oxygen bond of water. Howerver, it only takes 1.2vDC to break salt water into hyperchloric acid and chlorate. The "process" becomes more efficient the higher the voltage - and can actually reverse the hyperchloric devlopment by off-gassing of the chloride - into sodium hydroxide and other alkaline componds.

RE: H2 from seawater

An interesting invention is patent number 3,959,663 - "Tide Powered Electrical Generator".  It involves lifting a weight with the incoming tide, thereby storing Potential Energy that can power an electrical generator.  
Puget Sound, with its 10 foot or higher tides, could take advantage of this type of device.  A float could be installed under any of the many fixed piers in Seattle, Tacoma or Olympia.  The rising tide could wind a spring or raise a weight attached to a gear driven generator.  The float itself could be of significant enough mass (concrete) allowing it's falling with the outgoing tide to add to the power output.  The potential energy could be stored and used to provide electrical power at waterfront properties.

RE: H2 from seawater

(OP)
Muggle
Is there an upper limit (theoretical and/or practical) of the DC voltage for "splitting" the hydrogen-oxygen bond?  What is the upper limit based on?


DubyaDee
Interesting patent, I looked up the patent on the US patent office web site.  The pilings on the piers I can look at, appear to be spaced 1 to 2 meters apart in a grid pattern.  I wonder if any studies have been done to determine an optimum size of the "float/barge" for the vertical tide range in a given area.

RE: H2 from seawater

There is no known upper limit - mostly one of efficiency - meaning once you reach "x" volts, the process does not get any faster when additional voltage is added - and the other problem is evaporation - too much voltage and the heat builds to the point you get very rapid evaporation.
Some firms uses both - the breakdown of the saltwater to create hydrochloric acid, plus evaporation, evenutally releasing sufficient chloride that sodium hydroxide is created - this i snot a new concept to desalination plants. Figure upper reach is 400vDC.

RE: H2 from seawater

The "efficiency" of an electrolysis process will depend on the concentration (activity) of hydrogen at the electrode.  The activity of hydrogen depends on pressure.  Therefore the voltage you require for electrolysis increases with the pressure at which the hydrogen must be evolved.  Whether that pressure is a result of depth of electrolyte (i.e. piezometric head) or merely by using a valve to keep the hydrogen constrained within the electrolytic cell makes no difference.

What results is an energy efficiency loss to produce compressed hydrogen.  It may be less than the loss required to compress the hydrogen using a multi-stage mechanical compressor, or not- but it's still a loss.  The energy you put in to store it in higher density form is gone forever as heat.

When you let down a compressed gas through a piston engine (i.e. like the "air car"), you get only the PV energy back.  If you want to get a little more than that back, you need to use a Stirling-type engine, or you need a big gas-to-gas exchanger so you can use the atmosphere to heat up your gas after expansion.  Hydrogen's a little different because of its negative Joule-Thompson coefficient, but you're still certainly getting nowhere the energy you put in to compress the hydrogen in the first place, back out as work to drive the vehicle.  I've run the numbers on the air car and can't understand why anyone would do it, unless

Face it, guys- hydrogen is hydrogen.  One of its fundamental properties is that there are only weak Van Der Vaals forces attracting hydrogen molecules to one another- so weak in fact that the normal boiling point is ~ 20 Kelvin.  This material would much rather be a gas...To overcome the repulsive forces of molecular collisions resulting from stuffing a lot of molecular hydrogen into a small space, you need to put in some energy- and you only get some of that back, if any.  Doesn't matter if you use chemical adsorption by forming hydrides, or if you use physical adsorption using carbon nanotubes, or if you don't bother with adsorption at all and just use massive pressures and store it as a compressed gas or compressed refrigerated liquid.  Hydrogen's inherently poor as a high-density energy storage medium.

RE: H2 from seawater

I woulf question the economic transport of hydrogen by pipeline.  The energy content of gaseous hydrogen, especially at low pressures that a typical pipeline can withstand is relatively small compared to a petroleum based fuel.  To transport a reasonable amount of energy via pipeline hydrogen, the velocity of the hydrogen within thewill become so great that friction losses will become substantial to the point of becoming uneconomic.

RE: H2 from seawater

(OP)
The Heating Value range for Natural Gas is approximatly 38.1 to 42.5 MJ/kg.  The heating value range for hydrogen is approximatly 120.1 to 141.9 MJ/kg.  The economics of transporting natural gas via pipeline is well established.  Natural gas transmission pipelines are frequently designed and opperated at pressures up to and exceeding 800 pounds per square inch (about 5.5 Mpa).

With a heating value 3 times that of natural gas, one could argue that energy transport via hydrogen would be more economical than natural gas.

RE: H2 from seawater

Oh. So we'll forget about density then shall we?

Cheers

Greg Locock

RE: H2 from seawater

(OP)
GregLocock  Excellent point!

Hydrogen being about 6 times less dense than Methane.  Power consumed in a compressor being directly proportional to density.  Everything else being equal (and perhapse a little over simplified).  Hydrogen (gas) transport via pipeline should be significantly cheaper!

The issue then become cost of production?  Can hydrogen be produced in the range of $4.00 to $5.00 per MMBTU/FT^3?

RE: H2 from seawater

a) compressor power will increase due to low density.

b) adding H2 to a natural gas pipeline has a lot disadvantages, including changing the combustion stability of any equipment that fires the gas ( Wobbe induex, flashback, etc)- one can kiss goodbye any warranties on gas turbines or large boilers that fire the mixed gas. This is a big issue ( in the opposite direction)  now being considered in the USA by pipeline companies and users due to the expected change in natural gas composition associated with increased use of LNG and also reduced recovery of heavies from gas fields

c) H2 will leak through seals in valves and other joints much faster than methane, and may be incompatible with some metals and some sealants

d) H2 can be economically produced using bit coal or Pet coke  gasification, but the reliability of individual components is an issue. Each gasification vessel may have a max continuous runnig life of about 6 months ( due to corrosion) prior to major maintenance, so spare vessels are needed .

RE: H2 from seawater

davefitz:  you can make H2 economically from coal ONLY if you discard the product CO2 to the atmosphere.  The cost of permanent non-biological sequestration of that CO2 will dwarf the cost of replacement gassification vessels.  The CO2 emissions, plus the chained inefficiencies of the hydrogen generation, compression/storage/delivery/storage and fuelcell train, eliminate any net environmental benefit of using hydrogen in the first place.  Doubt it's at all better than just burning the coal directly in a cogen plant and doing a good job of off-gas clean-up.

Fuelcells are a great part of a renewable energy infrastructure, but you need the renewable energy sources to replace existing fossil-fuel derived electrical generation capacity FIRST.  Fossil-fuel derived hydrogen as a stop-gap measure on the way there is not sensible from an engineering perspective- everything I've seen tells me that the net environmental benefit is marginal at best, and indeed may not exist at all once you take everything into account.  Fuelcell technology right now is not driven by hydrogen- it's driven by media hype, generated by people who profit from this technology and kept aloft by politicians looking for the magic "technological fix" to our energy woes.

RE: H2 from seawater

Hi there.

I just wanted to jump in and mention that even though I am very excited about energy storage systems, a tidal energy generator doesn't neccesarily need to store the energy at off peak times does it? And if it does, the storage location doesn't have to be the same as where the generation occurs. Tidal energy is very predictable and can therefore be sold on the electric power spot market pretty easily. The energy can be used to offset other fossil fuel plants.

This is a problem with wind and solar energy, because it is not predictable, and since the energy needs to be sold in advance in most deregulated spot markets, it does not work well within the current energy trading system. Storing the energy makes it much easier to integrate into the grid.

I'm currently working on a project looking at adding energy storage systems into large offshore wind farms. I was looking for info about ocean water electrolysis and found this forum. I am excited to join the community.

I also wanted to note that even though there are inefficiencies in storing energy, due to the variations in the market value of energy from peak to off peak hours, it can still make financial sense. The differences can be upwards of 500% in some markets. So even a 50 % loss can still make money. I even see the potential in the future for local (customer side) energy storage systems that would allow people to buy energy from the grid at night (when it's cheap) and sell it during peak periods..

I also wanted to throw in some of the storage systems that are out there that haven't been discussed:

CAES: compressed air energy storage. This is usually done in large underground caverns but can be done in vessels. As mentioned in this thread, there are some vehicles that use compressed air. This is heavily being looked at for wind power, an interesting variation is to couple the aerodynamic rotor directly to the compressor, skipping the mechanical->electrical->mechanical energy conversion process.

Reversible Fuel Cells. (still in infancy)
Flywheels
Pumped Water. (this is really the only utility scale energy storage system in use today, except for a couple of compressed air systems.) Pumped hydro storage could be used with a tidal energy generator and managed by the utility.

For my location, I will be looking at steam reforming of methane that happens to exist under our location. This will generate H2 that will be burned in a gas turbine or fuel cell. The heat from burning the H2 will drive the steam reformer...and... hey.. perhaps it will distill the seawater before it goes into the electrolyser.
(I just thought that.. awesome! )

I still haven't found solid info about salt water electrolysis. Does it really need to be purified? I am looking at a system in the Gigawatt range...I mean big big big.

(i hope i'm not to verbose...)
john

RE: H2 from seawater

Oh yeah, almost forgot.

Flow Batteries.
Like a reversible fuel cell but use a oxidation reduction process with Vanadium or other fluids.. actually have a lot of potential for the future. Sometimes called Vanadium Redox batteries. Very cool.

RE: H2 from seawater

I have a question for people:

Does anyone know specifics about splitting sea water?

Does it really need to be purified first in a seperate step?

Does anyone know specifics about what needs to be done or any references I can find? I NEED to design a system to store electric energy by electrolyzing sea water..

There don't seem to be any electrolysers that work on seawater...

I guess the choices are to distill the water, or use reverse osmosis...then electrolysis.. is this the simplest way to do it?

RE: H2 from seawater

did you not read the early threads of this tread check out moltenmetal Nov 12, apart from that??

RE: H2 from seawater

yeah, I read those posts but am still not clear on it.

Does the statement: " If you want hydrogen and oxygen, you'll need a different electrolyte." mean that in order to split seawater for hydrogen, the salt in ocean water must be removed, and a different electrolyte must be added?

An electrolyte isn't added to water before it goes into an electrolyzer (as far as I know) so I'm not sure what that means....

are there any electrolysis units that directly extract hydrogen from seawater, or is it always a multi-step system? From what I have found, it always needs to be purified first. I guess this is because the electrodes will corrode or get poisoned if they are in direct contact with ocean water which is impure.. So even though electroloysis might be near 90 percent efficiency, once you inlude the energy required for water purification, this would potentially be much lower.


I am really thinking flow batteries are the energy storage system to watch. Because of the fact that you can scale them up by just adding more electrolyte, which is stored in tanks. They can be charged and discharged fully with no degradation, and especially with the Vanadium REDOX type, there is no crossover membrane crossover pollution problems, since the negative and positive side are both just different oxidation states of the same material. These systems can be cycled thousands of times and keep coming back for more. They are also up to 90 percent round trip effiency

RE: H2 from seawater

In a mixed cell, chloride in the seawater will be electrolyzed to produce chlorine, then hypochlorite, then  chlorate, then perchlorate...  If you want to produce hydrogen and oxygen, you need to remove the chloride and replace it with another ion.

The nature of the ions in the electrolyte, and the electrochemical side reactions they undergo, determine to a large degree the efficiency of any electrolyzer you might want to build.

In theory, you don't need to add electrolyte to a continuous electrolyzer if you choose one which is stable.  All you do is add fresh PURE water to an initial charge of electrolyte which remains in the cell.  However, just like in distillation, any impurities in the water will accumulate in the electrolyzer, requiring ultimately a bleed stream and an electrolyte replenishment stream if you want to run a continuous electrolysis process.

RE: H2 from seawater

Under Sea desalination plant producing electrolytic H2, O2, pure water powered sfloating solar panels. Is this economically feasible both technically & distribution wise using under water pressures?

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources