×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Thermal Resistance (Semi-Packages)

Thermal Resistance (Semi-Packages)

Thermal Resistance (Semi-Packages)

(OP)
Hi all,
I am in the process of modeling the thermal resistance of a surface mount (SMD1) package as used by IR and Semelab and Sensitron.
I am basically running a spread sheet that accounts for the various layers within the package including the material thermal conductivity, spread angles and effective areas. The problem I have is that the results do not match the IRs datasheets. Is this likely to be due to IR rounding or "guestimating" figures?
Should the method I am using provide a reasonable answer?
Does anyone have any other methods that may be of use (beside measuring the devices).
Regards,
Adyeng

RE: Thermal Resistance (Semi-Packages)

How far off are you and in what direction?

TTFN

RE: Thermal Resistance (Semi-Packages)

(OP)
Hi IRStuff,

The Value given in the App Note for the SMD1 is given as 0.83.
The value I obtain for the same sized die is 0.26?
I am suprised as this is such a basic package (No vias etc) just the following:
Si Die = 250um
Eutectic = 10um or preform of 50um
Gold flash = 3.81um
Nickle = 8.89um
Copper Tungsten = 274.6um
Nickle = 8.89um
Gold flash = 3.81um

RE: Thermal Resistance (Semi-Packages)

Do you still have the link for the app note?

TTFN

RE: Thermal Resistance (Semi-Packages)

What are you assuming to power generating area of the die and how are you determining the spreading resistance through the die?

Additionally, you are probably assuming 100% effective heat flow through the area of the die and substrate.  As an example, there may be derating factors to account for statistical possibility of voids in the die bond as well as voids in the bonding of the external pad.

TTFN

RE: Thermal Resistance (Semi-Packages)

As an aside, since IR's number is higher, that's probably a good/conservative thing.  Bad news would be if your number was 4 times worse than their's.

You should also read IR's AN-994.  They indicate that their thermal resistances are measured, using packaged die clamped to an infinite heat sink.  The temperature difference between the heat sink and the die surface is then used in the calculation of the thermal resistance.  This means that in addition to whatever geometrical factors there might be, there's also a contribution from the "infinite" heat sink used in the measurement as well as the efficacy of the thermal path from the die pad to the heat sink, e.g., did they use thermal grease? or was it strictly CuW to Cu?

TTFN

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources