×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Field weakening in dc motors
9

Field weakening in dc motors

Field weakening in dc motors

(OP)
If a run 100 HP/900 RPM dc motor at 1800 RPM by field weakening, can I still get 100 HP output at 1800 RPM ?
I know the torque at 1800 RPM will be 50% of 900 RPM torque but what about the motor output ?

RE: Field weakening in dc motors

Suggestion: Reference:
Donald G. Fink, H. Wayne Beaty "Standard Handbook for Electrical Engineers," 14th Ed., McGraw-Hill, 2000.
Rearrange Equation 8-15 on page 8-21, namely,

D**2 x L = (watts x 6.8 x 10**8)/[(r/min) x Bs x FI x q]
where
q = Z x Ic / (pi x D)
D = Armature Diameter
L = Armature Gross Core Length
Bs = Main Pole Air Gap Density in Maxwells
FI = Ratio of pole arc to pole pitch
Ic = Current per Armature Conductor in Amps

The Watts versus Bs relationship is directly proportional

RE: Field weakening in dc motors

yes

RE: Field weakening in dc motors

3
The answer is yes.  In field weakening, you are in the "constant HP range".

While torque reduces by 2, the speed increases by 2. And so, the HP remains the same....

HP = T x N /5252

at 900 rpm  torque is 584.55 ft-lbs

at 1800 rpm torque is 291.77

plug these numbers into the equation for HP above and you see that HP is the same at 1800 RPM as it is at 900 rpm ..

RE: Field weakening in dc motors

(OP)
jb & jO,

I see now that I should have rephrased the question.

Yes, under field weakening, the HP remanins the same due to the equations given by you. I wanted to know that if the connected load requires more HP at the higher speed, will the motor deliver it or simply stall or spark viciously or overheat? Have you had experience with such an operation ?

Thx for yr responses.

RE: Field weakening in dc motors

You will not be able to get higher power than 100hp at higher speed continously because you are operating at the limit of armature current.

Field weakening might only be helpful if your load doesn't need the full power at nominal speed

RE: Field weakening in dc motors

Suggestion to the original posting:
Reference:
Donald G. Fink, H. Wayne Beaty "Standard Handbook for Electrical Engineers," 14th Ed., McGraw-Hill, 2000.
Equation 8-15 on page 8-21, namely,
Equation 1:
D**2 x L = (watts x 6.8 x 10**8)/[(r/min) x Bs x FI x q]
where
q = Z x Ic / (pi x D)
D = Armature Diameter
L = Armature Gross Core Length
Bs = Main Pole Air Gap Density in Maxwells
FI = Ratio of pole arc to pole pitch
Ic = Current per Armature Conductor in Amps
By rearranging Equation 1:
Watts=D**2 x L x (r/min) x Bs x FI x q /(6.8 x 10**8)
it is seen that for Bs=0, Watts=0
I.e. if the Bs was isolated from the rotor or removed, then the Watts will be zero since r/min cannot increase to infinity.
Therefore, it will be possible to run the motor at 100HP at 1800RPM if this is within the motor "constant HP range" only as indicated in JOmega posting, i.e. (Bs900)/900RPM=(Bs1800)/1800RPM=constant…………….Equation 2
If Equation 2 does not hold, then the HP will be lowered somewhat.

RE: Field weakening in dc motors

edison - isn't doubling the design speed of the motor risky?  

Electrically, the commutation is set up (i.e. design of the interpoles and compensation windings if fitted) to cover the range of operating speed and currents.  You could be operating beyond these limits, although at least this can be clearly judged by viewing the commutation.

Mechanically, the commutator and the banding of the end-windings are designed for a particular speed.  If the machine is self-ventilated with an armature mounted fan, this may not be adequately rated to withstand centrifugal forces.  Unfortunately operating beyond the acceptable limit isn't obvious until it is too late.  Incidentally, a good guide for the maximum peripheral speed of a commuatator for a machine of that size is 10,000ft/min - for a well designed commutator (a dc traction motor say).

Ultimately it is for the design office of the motor manufacturer to say whether this is acceptable.  Having said all that, 900rpm doesn't sound that fast!

RE: Field weakening in dc motors

(OP)
ukpete,

The dc motors meant for variable speed in the ratio of 1 to 3 are designed mechanically to take care of the stresses. My case is a variable speed 100 HP motor (with a base speed of 900 RPM) designed to run at 1800 RPM by field weakening. As discussed in the baove threads, the output, as per theory, is the same 100 HP at 1800 RPM. My doubt was whether the motor can deliver more than 100 HP at 1800 RPM (in case it is required). Or will it stall or result in vicious sparking ? or simply overheat (which I can remove by improved cooling which is also enhanced by the higher speed).

RE: Field weakening in dc motors

Edison123

I've designed systems with motors having up to 6:1 field weakening (winders/unwinders/coilers/uncoilers, etc.)

Trying to get more than design HP from a motor in the weakend field range, will move you towards a problem in commutation.

There are many factors to consider which prevents a definitive yes or no answer from being given; not the least of which is the design of the motor.

Some other considerations of overloading the motor is the higher current density at the brushes over time. (I assume you are not talking about short-term overloading but rather, continuous overload.)

The machine manufacturer is the best source to learn of the motor's ability to operate at 2:1 field weakend and overloaded by some defined but unstated percentage.

If you want to find out empiracally, take it up in speed and increase the load while observing the action at the brushes.... you'll soon see whether or not you'll have problems. (Might want to wear welders goggles to prevent the flashing and arcing from damaging your vision  

RE: Field weakening in dc motors

(OP)
Thx jO. You get a star especially for the last part of your post. I'll load the motor beyond the rated HP and see (??) what happens.

RE: Field weakening in dc motors

Suggestion to the previous posting: A caution to be exercised since the motor may ignite.

RE: Field weakening in dc motors

jBartos:

Not likely if he eases the increase in load.... Usually the arcing gets quite severe before the comm flashes over.

Just out of curiosity, Josef, did you ever take a DC Machines Lab course while pursuing your degree ?

RE: Field weakening in dc motors

Comment on the previous posting: Yes, I had labs during various machinery and energy conversion courses. I also took apart some motors and saw some of them burned.
How about you?

RE: Field weakening in dc motors

Suggestion to edison123 (Electrical) Oct 31, 2003 marked ///\\\
jb & jO,
I see now that I should have rephrased the question.
///Any time.\\\
Yes, under field weakening, the HP remanins the same due to the equations given by you. I wanted to know that if the connected load requires more HP at the higher speed,
///It depends. Namely, the load torque-speed characteristic usually increases with increases with increased speed, however, not always. It may stay constant or decrease, which are rare applications.\\\

 will the motor deliver it or simply stall or spark viciously or overheat?
///It depends on the design margin the motor manufacturer imbeds into the motor. Normally, sparking will increase first, and later on, either protective device trip or motor stalls with improper protective device.\\\
 Have you had experience with such an operation ?
///Usually, one experiences the aftermath, unless one is in some university laboratory and watches the motor being overloaded.\\\

RE: Field weakening in dc motors

edison, yes fair enough, I got carried away playing devil's advocate.  Will you start it in weak field?

RE: Field weakening in dc motors

(OP)
UKpete,

No, I won't. But theoretically, you can start with weak field with corresponding armature voltage reduction.

RE: Field weakening in dc motors

(OP)
jb,

"Namely, the load torque-speed characteristic usually increases with increases with increased speed, however, not always. It may stay constant or decrease, which are rare applications".

Doesn't the speed drop with increasing load torque ? After all that is called the stability. or am I misunderstanding your post ?

RE: Field weakening in dc motors

Suggestion to the previous posting: A distinction shall be made between the motor torque Tm curve and load torque Tl curve. I was referring to the Tl not Tm. It is obvious that the fan will draw more current (higher electricity bill) when switch is turned fan to the higher speed. The same vacuum cleaner, etc., which are more ubiquitous motor-load applications. Visit
http://www.dynamometer.co.kr/MEA/25
http://www.me.mtu.edu/~wjendres/ProductRealization1Cour...
etc. for more info (many torque curves)

RE: Field weakening in dc motors

(OP)
To continue this thread, pls consider the following:

A 100 HP/900 RPM motor is loaded only to 75 HP at the base speed with constant armature voltage. Now, I increase the speed to 1200 RPM and the connected load requires more HP (but within 100 HP) at this higher speed.

At this field weakened speed and with the constant armature voltage (dictated by the Drive), I see an increased armature current to meet the new load demand. Due to the increased current and reduced field flux, the torque remains the same (as before at the base speed). With such a constant torque and an increased speed, applying the above HP-Torque-Speed equation, the output HP increases to meet the new load requirement at 1200 RPM.

Is the above scenario right or am I being totally way off the base ?

RE: Field weakening in dc motors

Hi Edison,

I think you are on the right track. But it early here, and my brain is only in second gear!

RE: Field weakening in dc motors

Suggestion: A proper way to go about it is to follow the motor characteristics to avoid the motor damage. Try to obtain the HP versus speed and torque versus speed motor characteristics (including 1200RPM) from the manufacturer.

RE: Field weakening in dc motors

6
There is no simple answer to this issue. There are a few different things to consider.

1  The type of load
2  The type of Field COntrol
3  The type of Armature current limit
4  THe type of speed characteristic required
Each of these will have an impact on how the control and the motor will respond to different situations.
I will write a little about each of these.

1  Types of Loads
There are a few different types of load.

Consider a fan , the faster it goes the more torque  required to drive it. thus as the speed goes up, the power, which is a function of both speed and torque, will go up in some exponent, proportional to speed.

you could have a Conveyor type drive, where basically the torque required to drive it remains constant throughout the operating speed range, in this case, with increasing speed, the power required to drive it goes up linearly.

Another type of load could be in the form of a cyclic load ( mining excavators or batch processing) where the load depends on how much product is collected in each pass. It could vary either up or down for each cycle.  

The motor and drive system will respond to each of these types of loads in different ways.

2 Type of Field control.

There are a few different ways to control the motor when it is operated above it's Base Speed.

The first is fixed field. Here the field is set below rated until you achieve the desired top motor speed at the top motor volts. You can have either a voltage or a speed regulator. In either case the motor volts will go up fairly linearly with speed. the problem with this is that the weakened field will result in lower motor torque for any given amount of armature current. (You need more armature current to produce the necessary torque)

The second is to have a "Crossover Regulator" Here you use a tachometer to measure motor speed, thus these are predominantly speed regulators.  Consider starting an unloaded motor slowly and then bringing it up to top speed. When the motor is initially started, the field is at maximum nameplate value. AS the speed reference is increased, the voltage will increase with the speed until you reach nameplate voltge. at this point, the motor will be operating at "Base Speed". After this the regulator changes in some way, so that any further increase in speed is achieved by weakening the field. The motor nameplate (or manufacturers data sheet)will specify the level of field to give top speed of the motor. Sometimes the maximum safe speed is also specified. The point at which the control "crosses over" to field control is usually set as a voltage.

3     Types of Armature current control.

You must keep in mind that motor will only provide power that a load can absorb, So the power delivered is controlled by the load and not the motor itself. Overloading a motor will simply mean that more current  is drawn to match the load. THe control should be set up to limit the amount of current to the motor. The most simple form is to have a hard currnet limit at some multiple of motor nameplat current (150% is a good starting point)

Another method of Current limiting is to use a " Tapered Current Limit" Here there is a hard current limit at some acceptable value for a motor at stand still, AS the speed or voltage increases, the limit is "Tapered away to a lower value.


Most motors can handle some form of overload (cyclic or occasional) but typically the RMS current of the motor, over say a 10 minute period, should not exceed the nameplate value. So if you are running a continuous process, You would not operate it above the motor rated current, whereas if you had some sort of batch process, of a cyclic nature, Large overloads in current are permissable, as long as there is a cooling time in the cycle to compensate the overloads.

Normally it is the responsibility of the equipment manufacturer to control his process so it does not overload the motor. If you wish to maintain set speed, the only way to reduce the motor current is to remove some of the mechanical load.

4  THe type of speed characteristic required
 
In continuous processes it is usually desirable to keep the process at uniform speed independant of load. In these situations a fixed hard current limit is the way to go because this allows the motor to operate in the overload area for a short time and still maintain speed. Some sort of Timed overload functions are included in the control to prevent a process failre from overloading the motor to destruction.

In, say, A mining application, Where stalling a motor to a standstill is a normal operating condition, The tapered current limit is the best method. here, Constant speed is not critical, but the fastest possible speed for any given load is the requirement.

Keeping all of these things in mind, lets choose a particular type of load, Field Control and armature current Control to answer your question about increasing load in the field weakened area.

Lets choose a crossover regulator, in a converyor type application with a fixed current limit at 150% of rated.

Initially you are at 75% load, so at full volts and rated full field the current will be pretty close to 75% of rated current at the motor base speed of 900 as per your example.

Now you wish to increase your speed to 1200. To achieve this , the field is weakened. Because the conveyor is a constant torque type load, the Torque will be almost constant. To provide the torque at the higher speed, more armature current is necessary.  

so, as the field is weakened, the speed increases, and the armature current increases. At some point, you will reach rated motor current, and your motor will then be operating at rated power (100 HP). This may or may not be at your 1200 RPM top speed. Assuming it is not at 1200 rpm, and you still wish to go there, further field weakening will result in armature current beyond the rated current. This is normally ok for a short while, but if you wish to have your motor last a long time, You are going to have to reduce the load somehow. For a conveyor you would need to reduce the amount of product going onto the belt at it's feed end.

So you see, in order to get the motor up to your top speed and still keep the motor operating within it's design limits, You will have to reduce the load on it.

Consider this from the motor point of view.
The volts are constant, and the armature current is increasing, so power, ( Volts times Current) will increase with the increasing speed. This makes sense from the Load's point of view as well. You are initially moving the same amount product, but moving it faster , so The torque is constant, but the speed is increasing. so Power, (Torque times speed) will go up.

This, of course, is only true until you reach the rated motor current. If the belt feed is reduced to keep the current at rated, The load torque will go down, this coupled with the increasing speed, will result in a constant hP  as long as the load is adjusted to keep the motor Armature current at motor rated.

Typically we do not set the current limit at 100% but allow it to go over for a short time, thus in a transient situation, the power may be momentarily over the motor rated.

If the armature current limit was set hard at 100%, your attempts to reach your desired speed of 1200, would be cut short at the speed where the current first reached the 100% value. Less load would allow you to faster and more load would slow it down.

This is very draw out and I appologize for the lenght of this but as you see, there are lots of variables at play here.

RE: Field weakening in dc motors

(OP)
Dear  Tom,

That was an excellent explanation which cleared my doubts quite emphatically. Not only was your explanation lucid, it was grounded solidly in basics. Thx for taking the time to post this. I look forward to reading your posts in this excellent forum.

Regards,
Kumar

BTW, you get a star.

RE: Field weakening in dc motors

Eng-tip: Visit
file:///C:/doc/Paper/Motor/DC%20Motor%20Control_files/DC%20Motor%20Control.htm
for:
Field weakening:
a. Shunt DC motors
b. Series DC motors
The original posting does not differentiate between Shunt and Series motors. Is that posting for educational purposes?

RE: Field weakening in dc motors

A star for TomG33's excellent post.

RE: Field weakening in dc motors

Correction: My previous posting link should be since the posted one has become unavailable on the web:
http://www.powerqualityanddrives.com/torque_constant_ho...
for:
A replacement DC motor could be run in armature control from zero to base speed of 1750 RPM and above base speed by field weakening.
When exceeding rated base speed in the field weakening range of a DC shunt wound motor, the torque developed will be inversely proportional to the speed, which is a true constant horsepower. Torque is therefore proportional to 1/RPM.
The torque available from the DC motor in the field weakening range will be proportional to 1 / RPM. See Figure 2.

RE: Field weakening in dc motors

Jbartos,
I am not sure of the point you are trying to make here but You must remember that these curves and equasions you quote are all calculated for given motor designs and tell what Torque and speed the motor will be at for any given combination of field strength, Voltage, load torque and speed.
They do not imply that the motor will limit the power delivered, to follow any curve,

The power delivered by an unregulated motor is purely a function of the power demanded by the load.

If you are running your motor at maximum power at top weakened field speed, and then hit it with a step increase in Load, It will slow slightly, The COunter EMF will fall and thus the armature current will increase, (torque will increase as well) and thus the delivered power (Speed * Torque) will go up.

As I said previously, Most motors can handle quite a bit of overloading on a short time basis. On the long term we must intervene in some way to get acceptable life out of the motor.

The problem is two-fold.

First the increased current will put thermal stress on the winding insulation (shorter motor life) and

Secondly, the extra current at the higher speed will push the commutating ability of the commutator to it's limit, resulting in extra sparking initially and if sustained, there is the possibility of a commutator "Flash over", which is a glorified way of saying that the current in each of the armature winding segments is not successfully reversed while the two commutator bars are under the brush. The sparking (caused by the reversal without the shorting brush) can be carried around by the fast turning commutator and if allowed to continue it can join up with tne next Brush arm, resulting in a dead short between the two brush arms ( one + and the other -)

Both the Driving generator or Static bridge and the turning motor armature with it's load inertia can feed energy into this short and the results can be Quite Catastropic.

This outcome is not really desirable so we put controls on the motor drive to limit it's current in the overload condition. Usually we do calculations for most load conditions we would normally expect to see and our aim is to Keep the RMS current to within rated current over a 10 minute period, and to keep the motor within it's commuataion limits (which are published by the factory) in the high speed motoring and regeneration quadrants.

This is where we use the Equasions  and the calculations you quote, or reference to,  To make sure the motor works correctly within it's design limits and that the load can be successfully driven by it.

No Motor will follow the constant horsepower line on it's own accord unless some sort of control keeps it there.

Torque is always a function of the load unless some type of current limit is brought into play.

Tom

RE: Field weakening in dc motors

Comment on the previous posting:
Jbartos,
I am not sure of the point you are trying to make here
///Just providing eng-tips to the original posting, if you have not noticed. I was not addressed to you.\\\
 but You must remember that these curves and equations you quote are all calculated for given motor designs and tell what Torque and speed the motor will be at for any given combination of field strength, Voltage, load torque and speed.
///Self-evident.\\\
They do not imply that the motor will limit the power delivered, to follow any curve,
///Not quite. There are curves or characteristics representing the system integration intended performance. In some instances, if the curves are exceeded the equipment protective devices trip or limit the device performance.\\\
The power delivered by an unregulated motor is purely a function of the power demanded by the load.
///Yes, until the motor burns in the worst case.\\\
If you are running your motor at maximum power at top weakened field speed, and then hit it with a step increase in Load, It will slow slightly, The COunter EMF will fall and thus the armature current will increase, (torque will increase as well) and thus the delivered power (Speed * Torque) will go up.
///The increased armature current may increase heating and commutator sparking.\\\
As I said previously, Most motors can handle quite a bit of overloading on a short time basis.
///Yes, when new. When old who knows?\\\
 On the long term we must intervene in some way to get acceptable life out of the motor.
///Agree, that is why I presented link with figures.\\\
The problem is two-fold.

First the increased current will put thermal stress on the winding insulation (shorter motor life) and
///Yes, that is why I presented the link with Figures.\\\
Secondly, the extra current at the higher speed will push the commutating ability of the commutator to it's limit, resulting in extra sparking initially and if sustained, there is the possibility of a commutator "Flash over", which is a glorified way of saying that the current in each of the armature winding segments is not successfully reversed while the two commutator bars are under the brush. The sparking (caused by the reversal without the shorting brush) can be carried around by the fast turning commutator and if allowed to continue it can join up with tne next Brush arm, resulting in a dead short between the two brush arms ( one + and the other -)
///Agree, nothing new.\\\
Both the Driving generator or Static bridge and the turning motor armature with it's load inertia can feed energy into this short and the results can be Quite Catastropic.
///Agree, nothing new. Nothing posted to the contrary.\\\
This outcome is not really desirable so we put controls on the motor drive to limit it's current in the overload condition. Usually we do calculations for most load conditions we would normally expect to see and our aim is to Keep the RMS current to within rated current over a 10 minute period, and to keep the motor within it's commuataion limits (which are published by the factory) in the high speed motoring and regeneration quadrants.

This is where we use the Equasions  and the calculations you quote, or reference to,  To make sure the motor works correctly within it's design limits and that the load can be successfully driven by it.
///Agree. The original posting includes data, apparently with the intent to have some analytical eng-tips presented.\\\
No Motor will follow the constant horsepower line on it's own accord unless some sort of control keeps it there.
///Yes, self-evident.\\\
Torque is always a function of the load unless some type of current limit is brought into play.
///Yes, self-evident. This is the Eng-Tips Forum.\\\
Tom

RE: Field weakening in dc motors

Great read Tom, well worth another star.

RE: Field weakening in dc motors

Suggestion: Visit
http://www.trainweb.org/railwaytechnical/tract-01.html
for more info on DC motor field weakening. There are probably similarities between the railroad locomotives and mining locomotives. Nothing has been addressed about this from mining expert Tom yet.

RE: Field weakening in dc motors

(OP)
jb,

Tom has answered my original and subsequent posts quite clearly (which is also appreciated apparently by many, who are really interested in learning something useful).  I don't see any point in your nitpicking over his post other than to confuse the issue. If you can't appreciate a good post, just leave well enough alone.

RE: Field weakening in dc motors

Comment on the previous posting: Thank you for letting me know. I feel that I have posted a legitimate posting without any "nitpicking." In fact, my posting was not understood by Tom; therefore, I provided answers. What is wrong with that? The original posting should have been more specific by providing guidelines to volunteers what to post.

RE: Field weakening in dc motors

edison123, I want to hear everyone's opinion, not just those that are approved by you. Then, I'll decide for me. Especially, I appreciate the input of jBartos, who may be the overall most knowledgeable person herein this NG.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources