×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

General advice need regarding assembly analysis

General advice need regarding assembly analysis

General advice need regarding assembly analysis

(OP)
I've been using Pro/Mechanica fairly succesfully for the past few months and now need to analyze a frame structure that is essentially a backbone of 2'x4' slab of steel, held up with gusset pieces to a base.  There are some masses cantilevered off the backbone, and all the parts are bolted together.

I need to analyze the entire assembly, but haven't played around with specifying joints and such on Pro/Mechania yet. (wildfire version)  What is the best approach for this?  Do I need to specify my part connections, or is there a default type of connection that Pro/Mechanica assigns?

Thanks!

RE: General advice need regarding assembly analysis

Mechanica assumes contacting parts are welded unless otherwise specified. I think this would work for a bolted joint if you analyze the bolt loads based on your FEA results to make sure you haven't exceeded the sheer or tensile strength of your bolts.

RE: General advice need regarding assembly analysis

ScottAW,

Please see the thread Simulating bolted joint connections (Thread828-73304). LTR is correct regarding the default assumption of a "welded" connection.

Best regards,

Matthew Ian Loew
"Luck is the residue of design."
Branch Rickey


Please see FAQ731-376 for tips on how to make the best use of Eng-Tips Fora.

RE: General advice need regarding assembly analysis

As LTR mentioned, if you assemble the parts by mating or aligning surfaces etc, the assembly will assume that the two parts are bound at that specific joint. This would appear to be okay for the bolted joints but what about the other adjoining components you mentioned?

An easy round way this is to adjust your assembly alignment;

Make sure that when you are locating a new component to an existing assembly, mate or align DATUMS or AXES.

Obviously this may not be as convenient as using existing surfaces, but spending several momments creating new datum planes will allow you to perform analyses on assemblies.
Whan you switch to Mechanica mode from Pro/Engineer, it will warn you that you have several components rather than one full assembled component. Check this number is what you expect!

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources