Inverted siphon ?
Inverted siphon ?
(OP)
We are designing a 10" diameter gravity sewer that has to cross a major thoroughfare. Unfortunately, an existing 20" diameter water transmission main lies in the direct path of the gravity sewer. We have no flexibility in the grade of the sewer as the downstream end is fixed. One proposal was to use an inverted siphon to dip under the water main. We have no experience with this method.
Is this a common solution to this type of conflict?
Are there any pitfalls to be aware of when using a siphon?
Are there other methods to get by the water main without having to relocate it?
Your thoughts and suggestions are appreciated.
Is this a common solution to this type of conflict?
Are there any pitfalls to be aware of when using a siphon?
Are there other methods to get by the water main without having to relocate it?
Your thoughts and suggestions are appreciated.





RE: Inverted siphon ?
RE: Inverted siphon ?
My references are "Water Supply and Pollution Control" by Clark and Viessman, 1970, page 186 and "Design and Construction of Sanitary and Storm Sewers", WPCF Manual of Practice No. 9 (ASCE MOP No. 37), 1970.
"The minimum flow in a siphon must be great enough to prevent deposition of suspended solids. Normally, velocities less than 3 fps are unsatisfactory. When a siphon is required to handled flows which vary considerabley during any 24-hr period, it is customary to provide two or more pipes. A small pipe is provided to handle the low flows; intermediate flows may be carried by the smallest pipe and a larger pipe. Maximum flows may require the use of three or more pipes. By subdividing the flow in this manner, adequate cleansing velocities are assured for all flow magnitudes. The entrance transition structure is designed to properly channel the flow into the various pipes."
RE: Inverted siphon ?
RE: Inverted siphon ?
Please see FAQ731-376 by VPL for tips on how to make the best use of Eng-Tips Fora.
RE: Inverted siphon ?
Generally, the only time I have seen siphons used is when you have a conflict between two gravity lines. Either you siphon, or go deep with the new line.
RE: Inverted siphon ?
Also, as the above posts mention you'll need to increase velocities. This means you'll need a smaller pipe than the 10 inch one you are designing. It will be a problem to keep such a small pipe clear. All the ones I've done repairs on were much larger so that the siphon pipe still had considerable size.
They're tough to design and maintain. I'd call someone with specific experience to take this on.
RE: Inverted siphon ?
RE: Inverted siphon ?
RE: Inverted siphon ?
If its a 10" line, I would assume that you would be subject to the usual diurnal flow patterns and that isn't necessarily a good thing with a siphon. Namely, during low flow periods, debris could settle out in the "belly" of the line and therefore over time, it could "choke" off the cross section until it no longer functions (therefore periodic flushing/maintenance is critical). If this line has periods of zero flow, I would highly recommend against NOT using a siphon for the reasons previously mentioned.
The benefit with siphons are that they usually less $$$ to construct and you don't have constant energy expenditures as you would with a typical pumpstation. From a maintenance perspective, I don't think either a siphon or pumpstation are better than the other.
My 2 cents.
Regards,
MB
RE: Inverted siphon ?
It’s a water distribution line and will be pressurized. Also it will not have any solids to deal with.
If timing is an is you can use restraining bolts on the offset so that the line can be put back into operation in a very short time without waiting for the concrete on the thrust blocks to set up.
Rick Kitson MBA P.Eng
Construction Project Management
From conception to completion
www.kitsonengineering.com
RE: Inverted siphon ?
It's a sewer line, not a water line - per the first sentence of the original post -
Please see FAQ731-376 by VPL for tips on how to make the best use of Eng-Tips Fora.
RE: Inverted siphon ?
Rick Kitson MBA P.Eng
Construction Project Management
From conception to completion
www.kitsonengineering.com
RE: Inverted siphon ?
It is just a "U" tube section within a gravity drain.
If one fills one side with discharge the hydrostatic pressure will force the flow through the "U" tube section.
Nobody would want to put a "U" tube section in a gravity drain to risk the blockage by the suspended solid from the discharge unless there is a gun pointing to his head (metaphorically speaking).
RE: Inverted siphon ?
RE: Inverted siphon ?
RE: Inverted siphon ?
Guess I was too busy focusing on the inverted siphon to see the simplest answer. Good call, Rick!
Please see FAQ731-376 by VPL for tips on how to make the best use of Eng-Tips Fora.
RE: Inverted siphon ?
Siphons are maintained by periodically flushing the system. What is the objection to it? Flushing water is already available from the adjacent 20" main.
RE: Inverted siphon ?
In term of cost and interruption can one justifies moving a 20" water main to suit a 10" sewer?
It depends on two considerations: what is the life cycle cost of maintaining the siphon, and what does the city think about the maintenance issues involved with the inverted siphon?
Please see FAQ731-376 by VPL for tips on how to make the best use of Eng-Tips Fora.
RE: Inverted siphon ?
The 20" watermain was recently constructed, tested, bacteria-cleansed and accepted by the local water district. We did not think the district would want to temporarily take it out of use, relocate it, re-test it and re-chlorinate it to accomodate the new sewer line......but that is exactly what happened. Four 22.5 degree bends were placed in a distance of 12 feet and the 20" water line was raised 1.4 feet above the 10" sewer alignment. The district did not want the maintenance problems associated with a syphon. This particular district also has authority over sewer lines as well so the decision was easy for them.
RE: Inverted siphon ?
RE: Inverted siphon ?
I have a much larger diameter pipe to modify with an inverted siphon, a 3'-3" one. To make things worse is encased in 5' by 5' reinforced concrete. But it has to be done. We exlpored all other options.
I wondered what the stage of your project was and how you made out. I'd appreciate any tips you might provide.
Thanks.
RE: Inverted siphon ?
Two messages above yours, I described how we ended up resolving our conflict......we decided not to construct the syphon and the 20" water T-main was relocated to a higher elevation......the local codes, BTW, require a minimum one foot vertical separation, water over sewer.
You have a 39" pipe encased in 5'x5' concrete block and you need to re-figure it with a "dip" to avoid conflict with another pipe crossing? Is your 39" pipe a gravity flow or pressurized pipe? What diameter is the other pipe crossing it and is it gravity or pressure?
RE: Inverted siphon ?
It is a 39" old combined gravity sewer in the heart of Toronto downtown, University Ave. and Queen St. West.
The conflict is with a short (less than 10') crosswalk connection from the new Opera House (being built as we speak) and the subway system. The City record drawings indicated lower invert of the sewer than what was discovered when they excavated for the foundations works. The Opera House and the General Contractor are not willing to do any revisions to the structure design as the construction is in process. They believe it would be easier to construct the depressed sewer as a resolution to the conflict.
The slope of the existing sewer is decent, 0.6%, and when I checked the headlosses throught the system they indicated that there would not be any sewage backing.
The problem with this particular site is that it is at a very busy intersection and the construction will cause substantial disruption of traffic.
Another problem is the confined space, the chambers and the barrels would have to be placed within 8' of clearance between the foundation walls of the Opera House and the subway passage wall.
Yet another problem is that due to a leaky watermain or some other reason, the surrounding soil is very wet.
Nevertheless, the project is a GO for now, mainly as a result of the Subway Commission advocacy. They really want to provide this convenient access from the subway to the Opera House and invite more people to take the subway.
So far the design provides for one 15" barrel designed for peak sanitary flow and one 38" barrel for the overflow.
I can tell you more about it if you are interested.
Thanks.
RE: Inverted siphon ?
Maybe you could avoid the conflict by adding one manhole upstream of the crossing and drop the flowline of that manhole below the crossing pipe (a drop connection MH)enough to clear the 39" beneath it then lower the 39" to the flowline of the manhole (so that you are far enough below the crossing pipe to avoid it). Then hopefully you have enough grade to catch the existing 39" at some downstream location where another manhloe could facilitate a connection back to the existing line. If you have enough slope in the existing 39" to do this, you can avoid using a syphon. You could place the new 39" at the flattest slope possible (0.00044 for 2 fps velocity).