×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Inverted siphon ?
5

Inverted siphon ?

Inverted siphon ?

(OP)
We are designing a 10" diameter gravity sewer that has to cross a major thoroughfare.  Unfortunately, an existing 20" diameter water transmission main lies in the direct path of the gravity sewer.  We have no flexibility in the grade of the sewer as the downstream end is fixed.  One proposal was to use an inverted siphon to dip under the water main.  We have no experience with this method.

Is this a common solution to this type of conflict?

Are there any pitfalls to be aware of when using a siphon?

Are there other methods to get by the water main without having to relocate it?

Your thoughts and suggestions are appreciated.

RE: Inverted siphon ?

Saw one constructed before.  It was like your case for overcoming obstruction.  Can't remember the details now but I suppose it requires periodical check/maintenance to ensure the system doesn't get blocked at either end.  The system I put in was near the outfall and the flow was always continuous but I didn't hear anything about it since.

RE: Inverted siphon ?

2
The only inverted siphons (depressed sewer is the better term, since there is no real siphon action) I did was as class exercise in school.  I did bid on the construction of one once in the past too.  They are an accepted design, but not used very often, basically as a last resort, as in your case.

My references are "Water Supply and Pollution Control" by Clark and Viessman, 1970, page 186 and "Design and Construction of Sanitary and Storm Sewers", WPCF Manual of Practice No. 9 (ASCE MOP No. 37), 1970.

"The minimum flow in a siphon must be great enough to prevent deposition of suspended solids.  Normally, velocities less than 3 fps are unsatisfactory.  When a siphon is required to handled flows which vary considerabley during any 24-hr period, it is customary to provide two or more pipes.  A small pipe is provided to handle the low flows; intermediate flows may be carried by the smallest pipe and a larger pipe.  Maximum flows may require the use of three or more pipes.  By subdividing the flow in this manner, adequate cleansing velocities are assured for all flow magnitudes.  The entrance transition structure is designed to properly channel the flow into the various pipes."

RE: Inverted siphon ?

Can U not add a manhole just upsteam of the 20" water and change the grade as U cross the thoroughfare? ie:steepen the slope on the upstream side & flatten the downstream side ?

RE: Inverted siphon ?

You could also use a small lift station if the flows are low.  Not as elegant or cost effective, but another possible answer -



Please see FAQ731-376  by VPL for tips on how to make the best use of Eng-Tips Fora.

RE: Inverted siphon ?

your first question needs to be answered.  Is this a common solution...?  No, the more common solutions are to either relocate the pressure line, or go deep with the gravity line.  A siphon (in my humble opinion) would be the last option.  

Generally, the only time I have seen siphons used is when you have a conflict between two gravity lines.  Either you siphon, or go deep with the new line.

RE: Inverted siphon ?

I'm more structurally oriented, so I just know enough to be dangerous.  I've seen them used some.  They are used when one towns sewage line runs through another town and the town they're in makes them do it miss something.  Also when a sewage line crosses an recessed expressway.  My involvement begins when the upstream or downstream structure deteriorates due to hydrogen sulfide gas.  This is a result of smelly gases being released in the turbulent conditions of the entry and exit.  The gas turns to sulfuric acid through some bacterial magic and eats up the concrete.  If there are residences nearby there might be complaints of odors.
Also, as the above posts mention you'll need to increase velocities.  This means you'll need a smaller pipe than the 10 inch one you are designing.  It will be a problem to keep such a small pipe clear.  All the ones I've done repairs on were much larger so that the siphon pipe still had considerable size.
They're tough to design and maintain.  I'd call someone with specific experience to take this on.

RE: Inverted siphon ?

Given the potential problems associated with an inverted siphon and the long term costs of monitoring, cleaning,etc.,  why not lower or raise the water line to accommodate the sewer at its desired profile?

RE: Inverted siphon ?

WHY CAN'T YOU JUST GO UNDER THE 20" LINE AND THEN BRING IT BACK UP TO ELEVATION TO MAINTAIN YOUR ORIGINAL GRADIENT?

RE: Inverted siphon ?

As someone has already eluded above, siphons require CONSTANT flow and above average velocities in order to work properly and problem free.  Siphons were around long before pump stations were and work on sound engineering principles.

If its a 10" line, I would assume that you would be subject to the usual diurnal flow patterns and that isn't necessarily a good thing with a siphon.  Namely, during low flow periods, debris could settle out in the "belly" of the line and therefore over time, it could "choke" off the cross section until it no longer functions (therefore periodic flushing/maintenance is critical).  If this line has periods of zero flow, I would highly recommend against NOT using a siphon for the reasons previously mentioned.

The benefit with siphons are that they usually less $$$ to construct and you don't have constant energy expenditures as you would with a typical pumpstation.  From a maintenance perspective, I don't think either a siphon or pumpstation are better than the other.

My 2 cents.

Regards,
MB

RE: Inverted siphon ?

2
Why not put a dip in the 20” line. All it will take is 4 45-degree bends and some pipe.

It’s a water distribution line and will be pressurized. Also it will not have any solids to deal with.

If timing is an is you can use restraining bolts on the offset so that the line can be put back into operation in a very short time without waiting for the concrete on the thrust blocks to set up.

Rick Kitson MBA P.Eng

Construction Project Management
From conception to completion
www.kitsonengineering.com

RE: Inverted siphon ?

We are designing a 10" diameter gravity sewer...

It's a sewer line, not a water line - per the first sentence of the original post -



Please see FAQ731-376  by VPL for tips on how to make the best use of Eng-Tips Fora.

RE: Inverted siphon ?

The water transmission line is the one that I am suggesting that be relocated.


Rick Kitson MBA P.Eng

Construction Project Management
From conception to completion
www.kitsonengineering.com

RE: Inverted siphon ?

Inverted siphon is a term used mainly for sewerage design.

It is just a "U" tube section within a gravity drain.  

If one fills one side with discharge the hydrostatic pressure will force the flow through the "U" tube section.

Nobody would want to put a "U" tube section in a gravity drain to risk the blockage by the suspended solid from the discharge unless there is a gun pointing to his head (metaphorically speaking).

RE: Inverted siphon ?

Put one line under and one over.  The top line works as a kind of overflow safe guard.  Put a valve on the upstream side and on the overflow line.  Since the water line is already there put a back-flow proof connection to it on the upstream end of the overflow and all you have to do is open the water line to flush the lower line.

RE: Inverted siphon ?

Oh I forgot to say you had to close both valves before you open the water main connection .  Open them after it is cleared lol.

RE: Inverted siphon ?

Actually, I think RDK's answer is the best: move the water line that's in the way, and avoid the inverted siphon entirely.  The water line could go above or below - it doesn't matter since the water line is pressurized.

Guess I was too busy focusing on the inverted siphon to see the simplest answer.  Good call, Rick!



Please see FAQ731-376  by VPL for tips on how to make the best use of Eng-Tips Fora.

RE: Inverted siphon ?

In term of cost and interruption can one justifies moving a 20" water main to suit a 10" sewer?  

Siphons are maintained by periodically flushing the system. What is the objection to it?  Flushing water is already available from the adjacent 20" main.  

RE: Inverted siphon ?

Bbird asked,

In term of cost and interruption can one justifies moving a 20" water main to suit a 10" sewer?

It depends on two considerations: what is the life cycle cost of maintaining the siphon, and what does the city think about the maintenance issues involved with the inverted siphon?



Please see FAQ731-376  by VPL for tips on how to make the best use of Eng-Tips Fora.

RE: Inverted siphon ?

(OP)
Thanks everyone for the thoughtful suggestions and comments.  

The 20" watermain was recently constructed, tested, bacteria-cleansed and accepted by the local water district.  We did not think the district would want to temporarily take it out of use, relocate it, re-test it and re-chlorinate it to accomodate the new sewer line......but that is exactly what happened.  Four 22.5 degree bends were placed in a distance of 12 feet and the 20" water line was raised 1.4 feet above the 10" sewer alignment.  The district did not want the maintenance problems associated with a syphon.  This particular district also has authority over sewer lines as well so the decision was easy for them.

RE: Inverted siphon ?

For my information, what code requirements does your local (state?) have regarding water mains and sewer lines crossing, etc..?  [I am assuming you met them]...

RE: Inverted siphon ?

Hello Pels,
I have a much larger diameter pipe to modify with an inverted siphon, a 3'-3" one. To make things worse is encased in 5' by 5' reinforced concrete. But it has to be done. We exlpored all other options.

I wondered what the stage of your project was and how you made out. I'd appreciate any tips you might provide.

Thanks.

RE: Inverted siphon ?

(OP)
Angusa:

Two messages above yours, I described how we ended up resolving our conflict......we  decided not to construct the syphon and the 20" water T-main was relocated to a higher elevation......the local codes, BTW, require a minimum one foot vertical separation, water over sewer.

You have a 39" pipe encased in 5'x5' concrete block and you need to re-figure it with a "dip" to avoid conflict with another pipe crossing?  Is your 39" pipe a gravity flow or pressurized pipe?  What diameter is the other pipe crossing it and is it gravity or pressure?  

RE: Inverted siphon ?

Thanks for the reply PELS.
It is a 39" old combined gravity sewer in the heart of Toronto downtown, University Ave. and Queen St. West.
The conflict is with a short (less than 10') crosswalk connection from the new Opera House (being built as we speak) and the subway system. The City record drawings indicated lower invert of the sewer than what was discovered when they excavated for the foundations works. The Opera House and the General Contractor are not willing to do any revisions to the structure design as the construction is in process. They believe it would be easier to construct the depressed sewer as a resolution to the conflict.
The slope of the existing sewer is decent, 0.6%, and when I checked the headlosses throught the system they indicated that there would not be any sewage backing.
The problem with this particular site is that it is at a very busy intersection and the construction will cause substantial disruption of traffic.
Another problem is the confined space, the chambers and the barrels would have to be placed within 8' of clearance between the foundation walls of the Opera House and the subway passage wall.
Yet another problem is that due to a leaky watermain or some other reason, the surrounding soil is very wet.
Nevertheless, the project is a GO for now, mainly as a result of the Subway Commission advocacy. They really want to provide this convenient access from the subway to the Opera House and invite more people to take the subway.
So far the design provides for one 15" barrel designed for peak sanitary flow and one 38" barrel for the overflow.
I can tell you more about it if you are interested.
Thanks.

RE: Inverted siphon ?

(OP)
Angusa:

Maybe you could avoid the conflict by adding one manhole upstream of the crossing and drop the flowline of that manhole below the crossing pipe (a drop connection MH)enough to clear the 39" beneath it then lower the 39" to the flowline of the manhole (so that you are far enough below the crossing pipe to avoid it).  Then hopefully you have enough grade to catch the existing 39" at some downstream location where another manhloe could facilitate a connection back to the existing line.  If you have enough slope in the existing 39" to do this, you can avoid using a syphon.  You could place the new 39" at the flattest slope possible (0.00044 for 2 fps velocity).

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources