×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Wind loading to British Standards

Wind loading to British Standards

Wind loading to British Standards

(OP)
Is anyone out there familiar with wind design to British Standards? I have a cylindrical tank and I want to calculate the overall wind load. The old code (CP3:Ch V) used an overall force coefficient, however the new code (BS 6399 pt 2) does not appear to have this and it is necessary, therefore, to calculate the loading on zones around the tank shell, resolve these in the direction of the wind and add them to give the overall load.
The problem is the CP3 method gives me a result about 50% higher than the BS 6399 method. My questions are:-
Is the method in BS 6399 appropriate for calculating the overall wind load?
Is the CP3 method over-conservative?
Has anybody else experienced the same problem or have I made a mistake somewhere?

Thanks

RE: Wind loading to British Standards

Hi MikePP,

I am not familiar with the standards you mention.  However, BS5400 has formulae, a map of the isles with mean hourly wind speeds, drag coefficients for shape and a table for heights for applied wind load, that will allow you to calculate a wind profile on the structure.

HTH

VOD

RE: Wind loading to British Standards

(OP)
Thanks VOD, I checked out BS5400 and it uses the same factors etc as the old British standard. Both of these codes date from the 1970's so I suspect they are on the conservative side. Sb is a 'terrain factor' related to building height and distance from the coast.

MikePP

RE: Wind loading to British Standards

I work in the UK and can confirm that most engineers I know are not comfortable with BS6399-2.

Generally it seems to give marginally higher values than CP3 - This is disputed by the authors.

Your approach of calculating a vector sum is the same approach that I have used in the past, but I cannot confirm if it is the CORRECT approach.

I degree of conservatism is probably called for!

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources