×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Aircraft nose shapes

Aircraft nose shapes

Aircraft nose shapes

(OP)
Whilst watching a tv programme about Concorde yesterday, I was struck by a question and hope that you experts can satisfy my curiousity...
Why do commercial aircraft and transports have such blunt noses compared with fighters or Concorde?
I know that they are travelling much more slowly, but from a fuel economy point of view, isn't a blunt nose detrimental?
Thanks to anyone who can provide an answer.

"I love deadlines. I love the whooshing noise they make as they go past." Douglas Adams

RE: Aircraft nose shapes

Dear Robward,
Corgum is right in saying that blunt noses on a slower aircraft will be having the same advasntage of lesser drag as sharp nose on a supersonic aircraft. The drag matters for the fuel economy as much as any other parameter.
Also sharper noses needs more effort in shaping of the instruments, antennas, and baggages for the occupation of the space offered by the nose portion ahead of the pilots' cockpit. The development cost for these shapely(!) items may fall on the aircraft manufacturer only, which is unnecessary in the case of slower aircraft.
meechu

RE: Aircraft nose shapes

(OP)
Thank you for your answers.
It's a good job I'm not an aerodynamicist: when I was a schoolboy all my aircraft were long and pointy.
But, then again, they also had flames coming out of the back and guns firing from the front.
Perhaps I have a hidden genius for supersonic fighter design?
Ok, maybe not...
Seriously though, I had guessed that construction and packaging costs might have had something to do with it, but I'm quite surprised that sharp noses incur a higher drag penalty.
You definitely live and learn.
Thanks again.

"I love deadlines. I love the whooshing noise they make as they go past." Douglas Adams

RE: Aircraft nose shapes

I once asked a Twin Otter pilot, what's the difference between the short nose on the -100's and the long nose on the -200's.  2-3 knots was his reply.  Dehavilland stretched the nose to make more room for baggage, and I assume that the speed penalty was less of a concern to them. (Doesn't seem to be a compensatory power increase).

STF

RE: Aircraft nose shapes

Dear robward,

The most important parameter thet sizes the forebody and nose of an conventional transport aircraft is the visiblity of the pilot.

As you see in concord, sharpness of the nose has imposed the complexity of the mechanism that drops the nose to improve the visiblity of pilot during landing operation.

RE: Aircraft nose shapes

I've had a similar question pertaining aerodynamics of buses. Buses have a quite non-aerodynamic form. But can you imagine a bus with an airfoil like configuration?

Well, I've heard many different (and some quite weird!)aerodynamic strategies for decreasing its drag.
But all concerned with the trailing edge (pressure drag), though!


Eng. Edmar Silva

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources