×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Fine meshes....

Fine meshes....

Fine meshes....

(OP)
I have a small (punny) difficulty, most of our parts are produced (stamped) from coil steel btw 0.003" to 0.040". When meshing in order to solve (the mesh) it is my understanding that the mesh size must be smaller than the smallest dimension of the part. (IE: so that all nodes lie in the body of the part) When I try to do a simple FEA on a part thats 0.012" (w/ mesh size set to 0.012") thick it seems that the mesher locks and quits responding. My video card doesnt re-draw well right now so I cant be sure the system is locking, (winXP, P4, 3Ghz, 1G ram) since I cant see the buttons when the CPU cant devote time to graphics processing.

Is it really gonna take >1hr to mesh my very thin parts? I did a 0.040" part the other day and that wasnt too bad even with some sections controlled down to 0.010" mesh. Is there a workaround for very thin stuff?

Nick
I love materials science!

RE: Fine meshes....

Are you using CosmosXpress or CosmosWorks?
I have only limited background in FEA but I do know that CosmosWorks will allow you to use "shell elements".  Shell elements are specifically for thin walled parts.  Your results will be more accurate too.

RE: Fine meshes....

(OP)
CosmosWorks....

Ahhh. I wondered about that, Am I right thinking that shell meshes are created by just meshing in 2-d the surfaces then connecting the surface nodes to create 3-d polygons?

nick

RE: Fine meshes....

Actually, shell mesh elements are only 2D polygons (no 3D polygons what-so-ever).  They are simply a flat polygon (usually a quadrilateral shape) with some sort of thickness property.  Of couse, even though the elements are 2D, they can be applied to thin-walled 3D models.  A shell mesh is essentially a surface mesh usually placed at the midsuface of the thickness.  SWX even has tools to create midsurfaces with wich to mesh.

Think of it this way: a soccer ball looks like a thin-walled sphere meshed with hexogonal elements.  Or, to mesh a length of L-shaped angle iron, only 2 rectangular elements would be necessary.

Shell elements are MUCH more efficient and practical when analyzing a thin walled part.

RE: Fine meshes....

I'm not so sure that rule (mesh size < thickness) applies across the board.  Typically, that applies to full 3D meshes, where you want at least 3 distinct layers of elements through a thickness.  Not necessarily so with shell elements.

You need to run multiple analyses on progressively finer meshes and check for convergence.  When you have successive analyses with nearly identical results, you have found a good mesh size for that case.

Also, try local mesh refinement in areas where the stress change gradient is most extreme (stress concentration areas).

All this machinery making modern music can still be open-hearted.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources