×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Storing energy with mass lifting

Storing energy with mass lifting

Storing energy with mass lifting

(OP)
Has anyone ever seen a system that stores thermal energy by raising a mass? I believe that such a system would allow for solar heating of homes by using the mass of the entire house as the medium to lift. A home can weigh as much as 40 ton (US) and, if lifted just a few inches, could store a significant amount of energy that would be extracted when lowered. Sure, this is a strange idea, but it seems to me that someone would have looked at this idea in the past...

RE: Storing energy with mass lifting

The cost to build a home that would lift several inches would be more than the pay back. It would require flexible connections on the plumbing, electrical, telephone, water, gas, cable tv, movable ramps at the doors, safety screen to keep animals out from under the house when raised...

A better mass raising system would be to pump water up to a tower storage tank and let it power a turbine.

In Europe there is a lake that feed water to a power house when peak electrical loads happen and off peak they pump the water back up to the lake.

Hope this helps.

RE: Storing energy with mass lifting

(OP)
Thanks for your reply,

I would expect that such methods for storing energy would have an "up-front" cost.  The use of a water tank is limited in its efficiency and mass.  The use of the entire building weight is better on both of these facets.  If done on the scale of a comunity rather than an individual home, a hydro plant or water reservoir makes sense.  

Turbines have an inherent inefficiency - so does the process of pumping water up.  A mechanical system has higher efficiency.  It is difficult to create however because of its uniqueness and high precision needs.  A hydraulic system (using rams) might be a good comprimise.  

The weight of a building is the key.  This weight is higher than anything else that can be used on a limited land area.  The elevated tank idea would work but only if the liquid density allowed for a large mass to be elevated - something like mercury would be nice if it wasn't so toxic and expensive.

The idea takes advantage of mass that all ready exists.  

RE: Storing energy with mass lifting

Mike,

Houses are wimpy and flexible, so lifting one would require a very different foundation that would get to be prohibitive.

Dirt and steel are quite cheap however. A little red paint and people would think you had a neat little barn in the back yard...  No complicated attachments.  You could sink it into the hole you got the dirt from...

Strikes me that you'd be looking at recovery systems similar in some ways to "tidal energy" recovery systems. Massive slow movements.  So "low intensity" that I'm guessing that you'd want to seperate the lift from the recovery system to maximize efficency in each.

Larry

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources