Line Loss vs. Transmission Voltage
Line Loss vs. Transmission Voltage
(OP)
Is there a general equation (empirical, theoretical or rule of thumb) that relates power loss and transmission voltage?
My specific problem: I want to transmit 15 MW approximately 2 miles via a subsea cable. Should I use step up transformers to go from say, 4.16 to 13.8 kV or transmit at 4.16 and accept the higher (if any) losses?
Just looking for some guidelines - I'm not an EE.
My specific problem: I want to transmit 15 MW approximately 2 miles via a subsea cable. Should I use step up transformers to go from say, 4.16 to 13.8 kV or transmit at 4.16 and accept the higher (if any) losses?
Just looking for some guidelines - I'm not an EE.






RE: Line Loss vs. Transmission Voltage
Your primary aim should be to minimize the number of cables under the sea. You don't wanna go too ofern under sea to fix a cable problem:)
At 4.16 kV, 15MW=18MVA= 2500 amps (this could be 4 or 5 cables per phase, x 3 = 12 to 15 cables)
At 13.8 kV= 753 Amps (say 2 cables per phase = 6 cables)
At 35 kV =296A. (1 cables per phase = 3 cables).
Of course you have to evlauate this against the cost of the transfromers. I would go with a single cable at higher voltage. Anything on land is easily monitored and attended to.
RE: Line Loss vs. Transmission Voltage
RE: Line Loss vs. Transmission Voltage
RE: Line Loss vs. Transmission Voltage
You will probably need two 3-phase cables for reliability purposes, rather than one cable.
Another factor to consider will be the loading pattern of the cable and the resultant losses. The cost of losses will then determine the most economical voltage level and conductor size. This is not a difficult study but it's best done by an EE.