×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Kgf/cm2 vs Kg/cm2
7

Kgf/cm2 vs Kg/cm2

Kgf/cm2 vs Kg/cm2

(OP)
We are getting inquires for pressure transmitters to be calibrated in Kgf/cm2 instead of our usual Kg/cm2. They seem to be exactly the same, but why are there diffent designators? How did it come about and why?

Thanks for any info.

RE: Kgf/cm2 vs Kg/cm2

Terrass604, It's the same reason why there are Pounds force (lbF) and Pounds mass (lbm). Both known as Pounds. The pound mass designation is strictly a weight. In pressure gages the designation is PSI, (pounds per sq. in); if one wanted to be super accurate, the designation would be, PFSI (pounds force per sq. in.)

Hope this helps.
saxon

RE: Kgf/cm2 vs Kg/cm2

2
1 Kgf is the weight of an object that has a mass of 1Kg and is accelerated at 9.8 m/s2 (acceleration of gravity at 45 deg of latitude and sea level). Strictly speaking, a pressure transmister should be calibrated in "Kgf/cm2", not in "Kg/cm2". Pressure should always be expressed as force applied per unit area. People use Kgf and Kg indistinctly, but the former is a measure of force -or weight- whereas the latter is a measure of mass. Note that force and mass are not the same thing. When people use "Kg/cm2" (instead of Kgf/cm2) they are just probably being lazy and dropping the "f"; they most probably mean "Kgf/cm2" in the first place.
     

RE: Kgf/cm2 vs Kg/cm2

(OP)
Thanks, and that clears that up for me and will relay this on to our quotations group as well.

RE: Kgf/cm2 vs Kg/cm2

To avoid confussions and reach an international consensus the trend now is to use N/m2 = Pa.

1 bar = 100 000 Pa = 100 kPa
1 torr = 1 mm Hg = 133.32 Pa
1 psi = 6894.8 Pa
1 atm = 101.325 kPa
1 in Hg = 3386.6 Pa

RE: Kgf/cm2 vs Kg/cm2

25362, The pascal-newton/meter unit system has always been a curve ball to me.

Have a better one.
saxon ;)

RE: Kgf/cm2 vs Kg/cm2

saxon, what is your preferred nomenclature ?

RE: Kgf/cm2 vs Kg/cm2

Why use metric if your going to confuse and abuse it with units like kgf? Sounds like a case of English system envy.

RE: Kgf/cm2 vs Kg/cm2

Maybe we can come up with a metric slug

RE: Kgf/cm2 vs Kg/cm2

kgf/cm2 (the so called kilopond) units predate the Pa and are still in use, like the bar, atm, psi, mmHg, mmWC, etc.

really we should get way from pressure and use elevation measurements. that would really "clear things up".

RE: Kgf/cm2 vs Kg/cm2

Actually as mass per unit area doesn't have any significance, kg/cm2 is used for kgf/cm2 for ease.

Adding to the confusion, we generally use the following pressure units.

Steam and water  - kg(f)/cm2

Compressed air - psi

Vacuum - mm of hg, ultra low vacuum - Torr

ventillation system - mm of wc (regulatory authorities are asking for Pa now)

Just give us 100 more years after all you people start to use common system of units.

huh..I don't think any unit is left behind

By the way I am very good at conversion of units. Unit conversion is the first chapter in our text books always.

Believe it or not : Goldbach's conjecture says any even number can be written as a sum of two prime numbers. Postulated in 16th century, nobody could, so far, prove it nor disproove it.

RE: Kgf/cm2 vs Kg/cm2

To all,

It is actually Kgf/Cm2 or Lbf/In2.
In practice we use KG/Cm2 or Lb/In2.
The derivation follows:

Pressure = FORCE / AREA
Force = Mass x Acceleration
       = Lbm x g/gc
       = Lbm x (ft/Sec2) x ((Lbf x Sec2/(Ft-Lbm))
Pressure =Lbm x (ft/Sec2) x ((Lbf x Sec2/(Ft-Lbm))/(ft2)
         =Lbf/ft2 (OR)
         =Lbf/In2

We say One Atm = 34 ft of WC,but it is 34 ft(f) only, derivation follows:
Head = Press/Density
  = Lbf/In2/Lbm x In3
  =  Lbf x In/Lbm  (OR)
  = Lbf x ft/Lbm
  = ft (as we say)

RE: Kgf/cm2 vs Kg/cm2

The gram is a unit of mass not a unit of force.  Other international projects use kPa but we use kg/cm2 on my project.  The British engineers substitute Bar for kg/cm2.  Consider proposing Bar instead of kg/cm2.

John

RE: Kgf/cm2 vs Kg/cm2


Gentlemen,

The fact is that the metric system has a separate unit for force, called the Newton (kg.m/s^2) while the, apparently revered, English system does not; so a unit of force in the English system is called a pound force (lbf) and is equivalent to lbm.ft/s^2. Simply to differntiate the two pounds.

There is an lbf and an lbm, while only 1 Kg.

In the Metric system, if you want to talk force, you use Newton - no confusion.

RE: Kgf/cm2 vs Kg/cm2

alomaritrq,
Oh would that it be so.  If Newton's (and their companion Pascals) were universal, then we wouldn't be having this thread.  I firmly believe that "kgf" is just a stupid as "slug" and I wish that instrument manufacturers would not accept orders for instruments calibrated in this abortion of a unit - except that instrument makers are not cops, and if one of us engineers ask for it and the first maker ssys "no" then the next will say "yes" and the first maker will have lost a sale and possibly a customer.

Engineers have to stop asking for stupid things before manufacturer's will stop making the stupid things.

David Simpson, PE
MuleShoe Engineering
www.muleshoe-eng.com

RE: Kgf/cm2 vs Kg/cm2

In US, NIST have 2 very useful publicatin for unit conversion and definition. #1 SP330 & SP811. You could download from NIST website.
In UK, NPL also have paper to describe the relationship between kg and kgf.

RE: Kgf/cm2 vs Kg/cm2

kgf and slugs are no more stupid than shoes on mules or something to that effect.

the standard measure of weight and force was a platinum mass in a day when gravity was thought to be a constant,having no really precise way to measure force.

as a result the kgf and a related lbf, poundals, and slugs became common place.

just remember both cm mm as metric units do not comply with SI either.  it is a matter of dogma or engineering, but at the end of the day it has to fit and work


RE: Kgf/cm2 vs Kg/cm2

cm is not an SI unit but mm is most definitely is an SI unit.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources