×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Autogenous weld cracks in 316L

Autogenous weld cracks in 316L

Autogenous weld cracks in 316L

(OP)
We fuse 1.25" Diameter 316L to 316L tubing; .083 wall, without filler and we have recently been experiencing microcracks that fail Pressure test (200 psig).  We used to use 304 and occasionally 316, problems were very infrequent.  The joint is a square groove without backing or purge gas. 50% Penetration.  The surface must be flush w/o post weld finishing. Hence, no filler.
Capt'n Tom

RE: Autogenous weld cracks in 316L

If your penetration is 50% your only getting about a .043 filler and of this .043 filler how much of this filler is good metal, your not using any backing gas? The problem seems to be thermal expansion causing the cracking. You simply do not have enough good metal to hold the joint together. Even if you have no root spacing your still experiencing sugaring of the root pass on the ID of the joint. A good backing purge and post flow of purge gas on the OD of the tube upon termination of the arc on the welders pull out is also necessary to prevent crater cracks. Are you welding in compliance with any particular code and or client specification? I have never seen a welding procedure qualified to weld ss without the requirement of a backing gas enless it was a fillet weld.

RE: Autogenous weld cracks in 316L

(OP)
We are an OEM and one of my battles is "We have always welded it like this".  I have been with the company for 5 yrs.  We have just recently become certified to Weld to MIL-278.  All of our new designs have joints that are in compliance to MIL-22.  The issue is "older" models that have been "approved" with letters.  I am looking for specific justification to add "filler, backing gas, etc.." This will obviously add to the unit cost

RE: Autogenous weld cracks in 316L

What process are you using, I assumed it was gtaw, I almost forgot but there is a procedure for welding ss without a back purge using the gmaw process short curcuiting tranfer with a special gas mixture. This application may or may not suit thin small bore tubing, but it may be an option. You would be adding filler and you may have to requalify your procedure. Either way I can`t really see much added cost.

RE: Autogenous weld cracks in 316L

We have welded thousands of tubes from 5/8"-1 1/2" 10-16 gauge. We used an orbital  tube welder and all autogenous welds.  We were safe ending S/S tubes mostly, but we regularly we welded 1" and 1 1/4" 10 and 12 gauge tubes.  We welded 304/304, 304/304L, 304/316, 304L/316.  We used an Argon purge system.  At times we experienced similar problems to yours, but were able to  lower the reject rate to under 0.1% simply by the addition of a square end prep machine and take the emery paper and files away from the welders.  We pneumatic tested all tubes and hydrotested 10% or more.  

Check and see if anyone is putting anything on during the prep.

Check and see if anyone is touching up the prep, Si-Carbide paper or a file

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources