×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Snow Loads Around Mech Units

Snow Loads Around Mech Units

Snow Loads Around Mech Units

(OP)
Something that really bothers me about the Canadian Code is when it comes to snow drifts around rooftop mechanical units.  The code states it isn't necessary to consider extra snow load if the width of the obstruction is less than (3.0*Ground snow load)/Unit Wt. of Snow.

Here in Winnipeg, this translates into a maximum obstruction width of about 5'-6".  Once you get over that width, then the snow load suddenly jumps up to 75 psf max (from 33 psf basic snow load) and the length of drift goes out a minimum of approx. 10'-0" or twice the unit height.

When it comes to replacing rooftop mechanical units on renovation jobs we often end up getting into beefing up the existing structure to handle these drift loads.  Then I get the "look" from the architect and mechanical guys like I'm from another planet.

Some questions.....

1.  What if one side of the unit is less than 5'-6", but the other side is say 6'-0".  Would you only conside drifting on two sides?

2.  What about if you had a unit that was 5'-6" by 5'-6".  If the wind blows at the corner of the unit then the projected width is now greater than the minimum.  Would you only get drifts at the four corners or can you ignore drifting all together?

3.  When checking roof design, I usually account for the dead load of the unit plus the basic snow load on top of the unit.  Is that right, or would you reduce the snow on top of the unit due to wind scouring?

4.  What would the actual drift shape around a mechanical unit look like, with the prevailing winter winds from the northwest?  I always assume the full drift load all around the unit but is there any way to reduce it?

RE: Snow Loads Around Mech Units

I share your frustration in dealing with the snow pileup issue around mechanical units. There is no logical answer to give an owner except to show him the code requirements.
As for your queries, this is how I handle those issues.
1. We use the pileup extent on the side required and extend pileup on the short side a distance equal to the height of the unit.
2. We look at the actual lengths. The code requirements are already ridiculous.
3. We usually include minimum live load of 1 KPa on the unit.
4. We also use drift on four sides. There does not seem to be a reference to allow for prevailing winds in the code.

One interesting idea I have heard of was to raise the units above the roof 2 to 3 feet to allow for the wind to travel without depositing the drift. I have not found any reference to this so I have been hesitant to use it.
Hope this helps.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources