fine threads versus coarse threads
fine threads versus coarse threads
(OP)
What are the pros and cons of using fastener with fine treads vs coarse threads?
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS Come Join Us!Are you an
Engineering professional? Join Eng-Tips Forums!
*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail. Posting GuidelinesJobs |
fine threads versus coarse threads
|
fine threads versus coarse threadsfine threads versus coarse threads(OP)
What are the pros and cons of using fastener with fine treads vs coarse threads?
Red Flag SubmittedThank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts. Reply To This ThreadPosting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! |
ResourcesWhat is rapid injection molding? For engineers working with tight product design timelines, rapid injection molding can be a critical tool for prototyping and testing functional models. Download Now
The world has changed considerably since the 1980s, when CAD first started displacing drafting tables. Download Now
Prototyping has always been a critical part of product development. Download Now
As the cloud is increasingly adopted for product development, questions remain as to just how cloud software tools compare to on-premise solutions. Download Now
|
RE: fine threads versus coarse threads
For example, given a thin walled tube subjected to internal pressure, length of engagement becomes problematic since there is not enough wall to support the minimal number of threads to meet a particular safety factor. The alternative is to vary threading pitch rather than attempt wall build-up schemes (threadolet, raised shoulder, etc) which could add cost or make the piece dysfunctional.
A possible downside is commercial availability of the pin. Depending on the size of screw used, you may be entering a specialized fastener or hard-to-get component. The alternative is to turn your own or special order the piece, again driving up cost.
Perhaps others can comment on additional pros/cons. There are many, but these considerations are the most common.
Kenneth J Hueston, PEng
Principal
Sturni-Hueston Engineering Inc
Edmonton, Alberta Canada
RE: fine threads versus coarse threads
The best reason not to choose fine threads is that they are so easily cross threaded. Fine threads in some alloy fasteners should be avoided.
RE: fine threads versus coarse threads
RE: fine threads versus coarse threads
"Coarse pitch is generally recommended for routine applications. Such threads will have greater stripping strengths when used with weak nut or joint materials or when used on larger diameter fasteners."
"It is easier to tap brittle material if coarse-pitch threads are used. Such threads are also easier to use in most cases: easier to start, faster rundown, etc."
"Fasteners with fine-pitch threads can have higher tensile strengths because the thread root and pitch diameters - and therefore the tensile stress area, As - are greater than they would be for a coarse-pitch thread on the same nominal diameter. [...] They also resist self-loosening under vibration or shock better than coarse-pitch threads."
Regards,
Cory
Please see FAQ731-376 for tips on how to make the best use of Eng-Tips Fora.
RE: fine threads versus coarse threads
RE: fine threads versus coarse threads
RE: fine threads versus coarse threads
For those that are interested go to the following for a dissertation on bolt threads and I mean dissertation. I’ve never seen bolts threads/stress presented like this.
Click on the help file and after that the "errors in text books".
http://www.boltplanet.com/default.asp
I wish I would have had this when I stripped the studs and blow the heads of my flat head Ford engine.
RE: fine threads versus coarse threads
The flip-side is that you have to insert a fine wedge a long way for a little amount of lift, while a steep wedge lifts more quickly. (see the "faster run-down" comment from Corypad)
So for high clamping force use a fine thread, but for general "bolt 'em together" work a coarser thread is more practical.
I assume we are talking metric threads here by the way, imperial thread systems (BA, Whitworth, UNF, UNEF, Brass threads etc. can be a real trial!)
RE: fine threads versus coarse threads
RE: fine threads versus coarse threads
RE: fine threads versus coarse threads
You are correct that fatigue is a function of root radius. But, according to V. Kagan in ASTM STP 1236 Structural Integrity of Fasteners:
K ∝ (P/R)0.5
where
K = stress intensity factor
P = pitch
R = thread root radius
Using M10 x 1.5 (Rmin = 188 µm) and M10 x 1.0 (Rmin = 125 µm) as examples:
Kp=1.5 = 2.82
Kp=1.0 = 2.83
Fatigue crack propagation rate (da/dN) is a function of stress intensity:
da/dN = C Km
For martensitic steels, m ~ 2.25, therefore:
da/dNp=1.5 = 10.34
da/dNp=1.0 = 10.37
Which is less than a 1% difference.
Also, according to ASTM STP 1236 & 1391, thread root radius only affects stress intensity factor if a/D < 0.02, so once the crack depth exceeds 2% of the minor diameter, neither pitch nor root radius matter.
The way that thread pitch really affects fatigue life is due to the fine thread's larger stress area. This allows higher preload, which reduces additional bolt stress from external forces. Also, the larger stress area will require more cycles for a crack to progress across it, assuming equal crack propagation rate.
Regards,
Cory
Please see FAQ731-376 for tips on how to make the best use of Eng-Tips Fora.
RE: fine threads versus coarse threads
RE: fine threads versus coarse threads
There are several other aspects to initiation of a crack and that is the actual shape of the root radius. That is the point that the radius is tangent to the flank of the thread. I don’t have any current data but the old numbers are. Tangent at a minimum of 83 1/3 % of the thread depth up to 179,000 psi fasteners. Special fasteners have a profile with a tangent at 75% thread depth which will not gauge out but will work in standard nuts and holes. This point of tangency is the reason for the different thread forms in bolts and nuts. Blending the corner helps a lot.
I would say 60% of the fasteners failures investigated that were caused from fatigue failure in the threads had a metallurgical or mechanical notch in the root regardless of the thread forming process. This was both with fine and course threads. But overall we had less trouble with the fine thread if it was a set-in stud or a bolt. We actually used fine threads on the set-in half and course on the other half of studs on a very high pressure cyclic service.
Actually the best advice is: “Tighten the fasteners beyond their working load and keep them tight!”
A quote from Mr Eltoon McBroom; Sports Car; January 1966
RE: fine threads versus coarse threads
Here is my attempt to cut through the confusion and concomitant resort to cookbook formulas and facile rules of thumb -
We are comparing the strength of externally threaded fasteners with a: coarse pitch and b:fine pitch threads.
What are we holding equal?
The material & finish, of course, the flank angle and the Major Diameter. Why? because bolts are sized by major diameter: it dictates what they can pass through etc.
Now you can clearly see that the shear-stressed cylinder defined by the ROOTS of the male threads is larger on the fine-threaded fastener than on the coarse-pitched one. That is why the fine pitch bolt is stronger - fatigue and otherwise.
What's the catch? Tolerances. If tolerances are fixed, as pitch gets finer, the diametral clearance becomes a larger percentage of the thread height and less of the flank is contacted. Too fine and the thread just strips.
I observe that Automotive fasteners are getting finer-pitched. Presumably because their fasteners are being made to finer tolerances.
RE: fine threads versus coarse threads
How would cold-flow of the clamped materials affect the selection of fine versus coarse. For example, my preference for plastic parts is thru-bolt design (more industrial parts - not consumer goods). In our case (we manufacture plastic pumps), we've seen loss of torque (and yes, we use calibrated torque wrenches) in coarse fasteners. I haven't fully evaluated the cause yet (temperature variations, cold-flow, or vibration).
I realize fine threads are better for vibration, but could you also reduce the effective torque to minimize the effect of cold-flow using UNF? Nylock nuts are relatively expensive.
RE: fine threads versus coarse threads
For your application (through bolted plastic components), the thread geometry and preload themselves are irrelevant since they must pass through the bearing surfaces to create the compression stress in the plastic parts. The compression stress determines the magnitude of the creep strain and creep rate that the plastic exhibits.
Regards,
Cory
Please see FAQ731-376 for tips on how to make the best use of Eng-Tips Fora.
RE: fine threads versus coarse threads
Thanks for the input. However, I would expect that for the same reason fine threads resist loosening via vibration better, you could reduce the clamping force or compression stress and achieve the same anti-vibration level as coarse threads. Because in our particular situation, using o-rings for sealing we don't need as much compression as you would with flat gaskets.
I'm trying to boil it down to the difference in pitch and how it affects the tendency to loosen the nut, apply compressive force, etc. We could lower the torque with coarse threaded fasteners (to achieve less compressive stress and therefore lower creep rate) but risk the vibration issue....
RE: fine threads versus coarse threads
It's quite interesting except a little hard to navigate. Look at the videos
www.surebolt.com
RE: fine threads versus coarse threads
Also, machining fine thread in harder materials is easier and less likely to break taps with CNC machines then when machining coarse threads.