×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

High Cu content in A356-T6

High Cu content in A356-T6

High Cu content in A356-T6

(OP)
What impact would High Cu have in A356. Keep in mind A356 has a low Cu content compared to other Aluminum alloys. The specified is .20 max and we have 0.422.

Thanks in advance for answers. I had some ideas but wanted to confirm them

RE: High Cu content in A356-T6

In hypoeutectic foundry alloys (Al-Si), which A356 falls in, copper is added to improve tensile strength, machinability and thermal conductivity. However, this increase is at the expense of a reduction in ductility and corrosion resistance.

At 0.42% Cu instead of <0.2%, you might expect lower ductility values, but with slightly higher tensile strength. The processing and casting steps will also have some effects on the mechanical properties of the end-product.

RE: High Cu content in A356-T6

I would expect that the excessive Cu will have minimal effect on the mechanical properties of the casting-- the concentration is too low to impart any significant strength to the as-cast of heat-treated component.  Maybe a slight bump in yield strength.

The big effect will be on corrosion resistance.  Cu forms intermetallic phases that are cathodic to the base aluminum and therefore promote localized pitting corrosion and stress corrosion cracking.

RE: High Cu content in A356-T6

TVP is correct in stating that ecessive Cu can cause corrosion. We had some very large parts fabricated from A356 when exposed to the elements behaved as 2024 would. No measurable loss of physical properties in our service, but contamination of a product in contact with the part.
Chemical analysis indicated an avgerage of 0.65% Cu in the problem parts. The prsence of Cu particles was confirmed by SEM. We were supposed to be getting virgin melt as per print. Someone from our side allowed the addition of remelt with no constraints to gain a slight cost advantage.  

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources