×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Concrete cube testing

Concrete cube testing

Concrete cube testing

(OP)
I have recently been testing 150mm x 150mm x 150mm concrete cubes with an upper surface sloping from front to back. The cubes have been loaded onto the crushing rig with the loading platten centered on the high front edge. The purpose of this is to encourage the leading edge to begin to crush so that the top of the leading edge flattens and the breadth of the loaded edge increases as the concrete continues to crush locally. This should continue until the front face fails through bursting or a limiting deflection of 5mm (measured as the platten moves down) is reached. However, when we measure the height of the front face after taking it out of the test rig we find that the cube has only crushed approx 1.5mm. It appears to have elastic recovery. Anyone else tried this test? Any ideas why the cube exhibits such a recovery?

RE: Concrete cube testing

In using this test procedure, you are assuming concrete has a significant plastic strain range. It does not. In compression, it truly acts as an elastic material, but you are likely to get multi-axial stress increases that will fail the sample prior to the onset of localized crushing, usually in a shear or shear-tension mode.

RE: Concrete cube testing

(OP)
rwoods

Thank you for your advice. I understand the suggestion that multi-axial stresses are generated in conventional cubes loaded uniformly on the top flat face and this results in the typically conical type failures seen in text books. To further test my model of concrete crushing would you suggest say a cube with a raised central ridge or prehaps a square based pyramid at the top face to reduce this multi-axial effect?

Regards Ginger

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources