×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Dilemma: making a batch finishing process flow

Dilemma: making a batch finishing process flow

Dilemma: making a batch finishing process flow

(OP)
I've improved the flow of several drill/tap type machining operations, however, my latest problem (ah.........opportunity) is in the finishing process. All these machined castings have to be vibratory polished.  Basically, this a glorified tumbling process (steel media and burnishing compounds).  The cycles are usually 45 min. to an hour.  This holds true for 80 parts or 20 parts (appx. 3" x 3" cubes)....doesn't matter.  Any suggestions or insight that might help me improve flow?

RE: Dilemma: making a batch finishing process flow

I have a few ideas ... just remember that batching can be lean if it is done properly.

#1.  If the parts *must* be vibratory polished, then that operation will force your batch size to equal your transfer size (Nb=Nt).  (This is assuming that you only put one part type into the hopper for any given cycle.)  Given this, I would suggest that you make the batch sizes on your other equipment match this.  However, the transfer size between each step (other than into or out of the hopper) should be driven down to 1.

#2.  Why do the parts *have* to be vibratory polished?  Is there a way to alter your other machining operations so that this operation is not needed?  Or perhaps the specification is a bit of overkill?

#3.  Can the parts be polished another way?  For example, some wood finishing operations will use a "slap sander" instead of manual sanding to take the roughness out of parts before staining.  Imagine a car wash with the spinning and draping bristles.  You put a part on the line, which is moving at a constant speed, and X feet later the part comes out.  If this works, this would drive your transfer size for polishing down to 1, but it may take up a lot of floor space and require some significant capital investment.

Hope this helps!

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources