×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Consequences of electrically bonding SST to carbon steel

Consequences of electrically bonding SST to carbon steel

Consequences of electrically bonding SST to carbon steel

(OP)
Here is the scenario:

1. Two large carbon steel stuctures are submerged in pool water.

2. The structures are coated with an epoxy paint coating.

3. The structures are joined together by SST pins.

4. The pins are electrically isolated from the carbon steel structures by non-metallic bushings.

5. The pins are over 4" long.

If the structures were electrically bonded by a cable running from structure 1 to the pin and from the pin to structure 2, what would happen?

Thanks

RE: Consequences of electrically bonding SST to carbon steel

Consider what is required for galvanic corrosion to occur and then review the galvanic series.

Note: Surface Area
      Couplings/Joints
      Water Content
      
  

RE: Consequences of electrically bonding SST to carbon steel

rjohnston

What material is your cable made of?
Is it structural or electrical cable?
Does it have to be in electrical contact?

RE: Consequences of electrically bonding SST to carbon steel

(OP)
Boomerang,

The cable is a braided flexible grounding/bonding cable (I think it is tin plated copper)

What I am fighting with is NEC article 680.26  There is a section that states parts in a pool greater than 4" in any direction must be grounded.

What is your interpretation of this?

RE: Consequences of electrically bonding SST to carbon steel

It reminds me of an article I read about a French LTA craft. During its construction and before it was allowed permission to take off it had to comply with safety regulations that demanded hand-rails. The hand rails were duly installed to spec and the craft was no longer LTA.
Were the regulations wrong? No, and they guaranteed that craft was doomed never to get off the ground.
I understand regulations require your project must have a common earth.
You might consider installing zinc blocks near each end of the cable. Connect each block electrically parallel to the cable. Leave the ends of the cable free to connect as specified to the steel structures.
Provided all the zinc parts are submerged it would seem to satisfy the corrosion issue arising from the earthing requirement.


 

RE: Consequences of electrically bonding SST to carbon steel

rjohnston

Well, it seems to me that the sst pins are submerged and the cable is connected to the carbon steel structure above and clear of the water and the all of the carbon steel structure below water is electrically isolated with a protective surface treatment, then there is no opportunity for galvanic corrosion to occur between the sst pins and the main structure. The only opportunity would be between that part of the copper cable that was underwater and the sst pins it connects to.

RE: Consequences of electrically bonding SST to carbon steel

(OP)
rnd2

Everything is submerged.  24hrs a day, 365 days a year.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources