×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

ACI 318-99 two way slab design
2

ACI 318-99 two way slab design

ACI 318-99 two way slab design

(OP)
When designing a two way slab, does the weight get apportioned according to the ratio of the length and width of the slab? It doesn't seem the longer dimension should be designed for the same weight as the shorter dimension since obviously the shorter carries more of the load. If one uses the same w on the longer dimension, the moments would seem out of proportion. I've read the actual delegation is the inverse fourth power of the length/width ratio. That seems correct to me. Is the shorter dimension designed for actual w and the longer dimension with a reduced w of that fourth power inverse ratio? I've never been clear on how the transverse (perpindicular) direction is treated.
Thanks

RE: ACI 318-99 two way slab design

ACI Chapter 13 provides for two methods of determining the forces acting on the two-way slab:  Direct Design and Equivalent Frame.

We've almost always use the equivalent frame method which requires you to analyze the total load in one direction and then turn 90 degrees and analyze the total load in the orthogonal direction.  I've always questioned this as not really being a true "two-way" system because you are really designing two one-way systems perpendicular to each other.  

For each direction, you are designing a strip of concrete of width "w" where w is the distance from center of bay to center of bay with the column line in the middle.  You detail reinforcing for a column strip in the middle and two half-middle strips on either side.

With this method, there is really no need to proportion the loads to each orthogonal direction because each direction takes 100% of the load.

RE: ACI 318-99 two way slab design

I have frequently designed two-way slabs using Rectangular Plate Design Aids. These aids provide charts for different plate side ratios, loading conditions (uniform pressure, varying pressure) and edge conditions (fixed, pinned, free edges). Using these chart coefficients, the loading and plate sizes, you can calculate the resulting moment and shear at almost any point in the slab.

One reference that contains such charts is "Rectangular Concrete Tanks" published by the Portland Cement Association (PCA). Another is titled "Moments & Reactions for Rectangular Plates" published by the U.S. Department of the Interior.

Hope this helps...

RE: ACI 318-99 two way slab design

It took a while for me to justify to myself why, in a two-way slab, you design for 100% of the load in the X direction and 100% in the Y direction, as opposed to proportioning it like 50/50 or 60/40.  

It seems redundant to design for 100 percent each way, but it' not.

This is because the loading "picked up" by the X-span flows east and west to the Y-span, where the load turns a corner and follows the Y-span until it hits a support.  And similarly with loading "picked up" by the Y-span, it flows north-south till it turns a corner and follows the X-span until it hits a support.


So basically what the X-span "sees" is the load it directly picks up as well as the load it "receives" from the Y-span, totalling 100% of the applied dead + live.  And similarly for the Y-span.

RE: ACI 318-99 two way slab design

On the question of whether you need to design for 100% of load to be carried in each direction; it depends on the support conditions.

If you have a slab supported on walls then you will only need to design for a portion of the load in each direction. This can be done using a grid analysis, slab design tables, yield line, strip method, or other suitable method.

If the slab is supported on columns then you need to design for the total load to be carried in both directions. Again by a variety of methods.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources