×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Load Combinations and Factors of Safety

Load Combinations and Factors of Safety

Load Combinations and Factors of Safety

(OP)
When you use the combinations from the ASCE 7, particularly the 0.6D+W, for footing design, do you use factors of safety of 1.5 for overturning, uplift and shear as well, or is the 0.6 considered the factor of safety? For instance, if I use 0.6D+W and find my uplift or lateral load, will my factor of safety need to be 1.5? Some structural engineers I have asked say use the FS=1.5 in addition to 0.6D and some say use 1.0.  I use 1.5 in conjunction with 0.6D to be safe but this seems a bit excessive and I have not located any part of the code that specifically answers my question.  Any help or advice would be greatly appreciated.

RE: Load Combinations and Factors of Safety

The 0.6D + W combination is an ASD combination, therefore would be subject to a normal factor of safety.  The 0.6 factor is trying to recognize that all of the assumed dead load might not be present in combination with the wind.  For example, collateral loads are generally assumed to be dead loads, but just because you plan on 3 psf for a sprinkler system doesn't mean every square foot of the building sees the full 3 psf.
Alternatively, use the Strength Design combination of "0.9D + 1.6W" with an appropriate resistance factor.

RE: Load Combinations and Factors of Safety

You will notice that in the current codes (IBC 2000) the requirement for the 1.5 (using 2/3 of the actual Dead Load) safety factor has been removed.  Instead it states that the Minimum Dead loads should be used to resist the overturning loads.  If you are looking at 0.6D+W.  This is a 1.667 factor of safety using the minimum dead loads, which is larger than the 1.5 you used before.

I typically have two Dead Load cases (Dmin and Dmax).  I use Dmin in caclulating my overturning resistance and Dmax to calculate maximum bearing.

I find in a lot of cases that Dmin is quite a bit less than 0.6Dmax

RE: Load Combinations and Factors of Safety

I noticed that too DTJ. It appears to have been replaced with the 0.6D + W. I think this load combination is more conservative than the 1.5 FOS as conditions and geometry could at times cause even a 10% increase in dead load to increase the FOS for OT even 50%.

So the FOS with that load combination is 1.0. But in actuality, it practically equates to the old 1.5 FOS.

RE: Load Combinations and Factors of Safety

Lets not confuse factors of safety with load factors, they are two completely different concepts and should be applied separately. Load factors allow for a certain design load to be exceeded. For example, a load factor of 1.2 implies that there is a 20% chance of a design load being exceeded during the life of a structure. These load factors are the result of much research and statistical analysis. A factor of safety is nothing more than a "fudge factor" to allow for variations in workmanship, material properties, etc. This is a subject that often peaks my interest when these terms are used interchangably. To put it in perspective, it is like a geotechnical engineer referring to soil as "dirt". Thats my 2 cents.

RE: Load Combinations and Factors of Safety

Well, a bit more accurately, the load factors are statistical numbers that inflate the load such that there is a 90% probability that the inflated number will NOT be exceeded based on measured variability of the load.

In bit simpler English:  When you factor up a typical load, say 100 psf times 1.6 = 160 psf, and this load will vary in magnitude over the life of the structure, you have a 90% probability that these loads won't go over 160 psf.

RE: Load Combinations and Factors of Safety

So.....when I'm designing a spread footing under a column and checking for overturning, do I need to assume that only 60% of the weight of footing concrete and overburden soil is available to resist the overturning moment?  The load case I'm checking is 0.6D+W per IBC 2000.

RE: Load Combinations and Factors of Safety

Yes

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources