×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

tie rods for rigid frames
2

tie rods for rigid frames

tie rods for rigid frames

(OP)
I am designing a foundation for a 155' clear span rigid frame. I need to design a tie rod to carry the horizontal thrust at the base of the frame. What is the best way anyone has seen this done. Please be specific in your response concerning the load path from the column baseplate to the tie rod and how the tie rod is actually fastened to the concrete or coulmn. Thanks in advance.
 

RE: tie rods for rigid frames

I allways transfer the lateral load from the column to the concrete by means of the anchor bolts or shear plates.  Then I embed a bearing plate near the anchor bolts (useally a large angle) and run the tie rods through the bearing plate with a nut on either side.  Use sufficient reinforcing in the concrete to confine it in the load transfer area.  Never had any problems.

RE: tie rods for rigid frames

I typically use standard hook bars in the pier, extending out into the slab and lapping with bars which extend to the opposite face of the buiding.

DaveAtkins

RE: tie rods for rigid frames

I do similar to what Dave does. I use hairpins. I use one set per two anchor bolts. I bend them to form a "VEE" with flat segment around the anchor bolts. The length of the hairpins depends on the tensile force to be resisted. You can bend the legs at 60 or 30 degrees. Art corners, I bend one leg so it is parallel with the building side. This theory assumes the slab to resist the horizontal thrust. I have designed many buildings using it and it works successfully.

I plan on writing a paper with a design example on how I design the hairpins. As a matter of fact, I have done so many; I have developed a table with various values. Some metal building suppliers used to issue similar tables in their literature. I think they are shying away or getting cheap.

Good luck

RE: tie rods for rigid frames

(OP)
Thanks, I appreciate the response. It seems there is more than one way to take care of the thrust. The important thing--just take care of it.

RE: tie rods for rigid frames

2
A few contrary points on this issue:
I suspect that what you are really looking for is not the tie rod design, but the design of a foundation that can resist lateral column reactions.  Tie rods represent only one -- and not necessarily the best -- approach.  There are other solutions (see Newman, Metal Building Systems, McGraw-Hill, 1997). Some of them, such as moment-resisting foundations in combination with slab dowels, may be better.

The main problems with tie rods are:
1. They elongate under load -- and allow the foundations to spread.  This may be OK for a flexible metal building but not for one clad in brittle masonry.  The best but $$ solutions are to encase them in heavy grage beams (say 16" x 16")or to post-tension them.
2. The tie rods do nothing against resisting wind loads acting inward (again, the grade beams would help here).
3. The tie-rods must be protected against corrosion, so they are ofter enclosed in grouted sheaths ($$)or, again, in concrete grade beams.
4. ACI 318 requires mechanical connections at tension-tie members...so sorry guys, lap splicing them is not allowed.  For the same reason, hairpins are a no-no code-wise, despite the fact that pre-engineered manufacturers push them as a cheap solution to a complex problem.
5.  Last, and most importantly, tie rods, if used, should be located well below the slab (12", say) so as not to be cut during future renovation activities.  It is only a matter of time before someone will cut the slab to replace some piping or conduits.  For the same reason, hairpins should be avoided in slabs on grade.

RE: tie rods for rigid frames

Lufti-

You wrote:
"I plan on writing a paper with a design example on how I design the hairpins. As a matter of fact, I have done so many; I have developed a table with various values. Some metal building suppliers used to issue similar tables in their literature. I think they are shying away or getting cheap."

How's that design paper coming? I've been looking for information on designing haripins, and the metal building manufacturer's no longer have design handbooks available; so...how's that design paper coming? (hint,hint)

RE: tie rods for rigid frames

Mechanically splicing tie rods encased in concrete is not a big deal.  You can use something like the Zap Screwlok, or you can use a welded splice with A706 rebar and and steel angles.  Our office has had good success with these methods.  I prefer the Zap Screwlok.  It is important that the construction of the tie rods (especially any splices)be covered by the special inspection program. Because of the critical nature of these elements, we design them for twice the applied load. We always encase them in concrete for corrosion protection, and always burry them below the floor slab.  It is true that using tie rods should not be a "knee jerk" reaction to resisting rigid frame thrusts, sometimes a moment resisting footing is better.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources