×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Non Destructive Testing of Structures for Seismic Compliance

Non Destructive Testing of Structures for Seismic Compliance

Non Destructive Testing of Structures for Seismic Compliance

(OP)
I am looking into a device which is supposed to "measure" the ability of older structures to withstand earthquake forces. This is to be used on structures built abroad before the codes dealt with seismic design. Does such a device exist in the States?

RE: Non Destructive Testing of Structures for Seismic Compliance

I've not heard of such a device and regularly perform seismic analysis, design and retrofit for structures.

I would hope that something of this nature would be documented through one of the many earthquake engineering databases.  In that regard, I suggest you check www.eeri.org and look into the Earthquake Spectra.  There is also a link on the EERI site to access another database.  Check out the Quakeline database available at MCEER.

RE: Non Destructive Testing of Structures for Seismic Compliance

Seismic resistance is not a property that can be measured by a testing machine.  Seismic resistance is a combination of strength and ductility that is designed into the structure by choosing material properties, member sizes, and proper detailing.  There are many testing procedures you can use (magnetic, ultrasonic, etc.) that will give you information about the material properties and member sizes.  However, that is just the beginning of the story.  With that initial information, you must analyze the structure to determine if the capacity is adequate for the anticipated seismic demand.

You can make some preliminary judgments about seismic performance from the age of the building and structural system used.  But to accurately predict seismic resistance you need an engineer experienced in seismic design, not a testing machine.

In the U.S., some good references to start with are distributed free of charge by the Federal Emergency Management Agency.  FEMA 154, 178, 273, 306, 310, and 356 (and companion documents of supporting information) will get you started.

RE: Non Destructive Testing of Structures for Seismic Compliance

There are numerous ways to interpret the original message:
I have been involved with the retrofit of Unreinforced Masonry buildings in California for many years. There are test methods to determine the stength of the mortar (in-plain shear testing) where a brick is removed an a piston is placed in the cavity. The equiptment measures the first movment of the bed and head joints so that the strength of the wall can be evaluated. The UCBC Appendix Chapter 1 sets a minimum value for the strength of the wall in shear and this "push-test" is one of the evaluation tools.

From another side, the author of the original post may be talking about Risk Mangament - Probable Maximum Loss studies which are becomming much more popular as businesses and their insurance carriers are concerned with the risk and expected life of their investment.

There are many companies which specialize in Probable Maximum Loss reports and if this is what you are considering, then you might start by looking up companies that specialize in this area. In fact, there are some major players that subcontract to engineers around the country and train them to produce reports using their materials.

The California Department of Insurance has a webpage with CA Earthquake Liability Questionnaire Form  and Instruction to perform a Maximum Loss Evaluation. This is located at their site at: http://www.insurance.ca.gov/RRD/RSU/PML/PML2000.htm
I did a Google search on "Probable Maximum Loss" and found a great deal of information on this type of work.

Hope this helps.

The Structuralist
http://www.structuralist.net
http://www.structuralist.net/cgi-local/yabb/YaBB.cgi

RE: Non Destructive Testing of Structures for Seismic Compliance

What there is as well is a

Counterrotating eccentric weight vibration generator. You can see it in fig 3.3.1 in p. 81

Dynamics of Structures
Anil K. Chopra
Prentice Hall

from its use attached to one structure some experimental evaluation of some parameters relevant to seismic excitation can be gained. Since the excitation in any case quite different form an earthquake, and much limited in intensity by comparison, results are interesting but never give "the strength of the structure".

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources