×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

efficincy calcs. for recip. comp.

efficincy calcs. for recip. comp.

efficincy calcs. for recip. comp.

(OP)
gents,
Any hint how can i calculate the volumatric eff. for a multi stages recip. compressor? it is 3 stages comp. pumping pure ethylene from 0.95 bara to 37bara (-90 deg c to 150 deg c). i know the calcs will not be accutrate as we need the detailed dimensions and clearances but as an estimate only.
upm

RE: efficincy calcs. for recip. comp.

the equation for volumetric efficiency is in the compressor chapter of the gpsa.  if you do not have the gpsa, i recommend obtaining a copy.
without accurate cylinder clearances, it is difficult to determine volumetric efficiency.
to determine VE, you will need: compression ratio (at cylinder flange), specific heat ratio, and cylinder clearance.

VE = 1 - Clr% [Rc^(1/k) - 1]

check this website:

http://www.vairex.com/pdf/Efficiency-0523.pdf

good luck!
-pmover

RE: efficincy calcs. for recip. comp.

by the way, this calc will need to be done for each cylinder for each stage!  for double acting cylinders, you will need to consider both sides of the piston.
-pmover

RE: efficincy calcs. for recip. comp.

Don't forget to use the clearance as a decimal, i.e., 5% would be 0.05. For ethylene the n value changes from suction to dicharge; an average for a ballpark estimate would be 0.2.

The formula given by pmover is correct; however, sometimes expert books prefer to substitute 0.97 for 1:

VE1=0.97-[clea.(PR1/n-1)].
PR is the pressure ratio.

As an example, assume PR per stage is 3.4, i.e.,(37/0.95)0.333, and an effective clearance of 10%,

VE1=0.97-0.1(3.41/1.2-1)=0.792=79.2% per stage.

A second step would correct (slightly improve) the VE for high-pressure supercompressibility:

VE2= 1+clea.-[(1+clea.-VE1)Zs/Zd]

where Zs, Zd are the compressibility values at suction and discharge, respectively.




RE: efficincy calcs. for recip. comp.

(OP)
Gents,
Thanks alot for the great support. i will calculate the VE based on the design clearances (max. limit) then i already planned for piston/cylinder inspection soon to measure the actual clearances and to check up the piston conditions. once i measured the actual, i will re-calculate the VE to check for the deviation.

pmover
what is the "gpsa" book, and how can i get it?
thans again for the help
upm

RE: efficincy calcs. for recip. comp.

(OP)
25362 ,
sorry but i could not understand what did you mean by %clearance ?? normally the cylinder to piston clearance is between 0.5 to 1 mm? can i use these numbers in the equasion ?could you pls. explain me? for n , k values do i need to coorect for the actual temp. or the change will be minor?
thanks the help
upm

RE: efficincy calcs. for recip. comp.

Clearance is %, but in the formula it is taken as a decimal. For example, 5% is taken as 0.05.
"n" values change with T,P. That's the reason I took 1.2 as an average for ballpark estimates. Values for ethylene are given in the technical literature.
For each stage they wouldn't change too much, and an average of "in and out" for each  stage would suffice. There are other factors such as leakages, friction drops, changes in temperature, losses due to imperfect valve action, that decrease the real efficiency. By splitting the total compression into three stages you actually improve the VE, the first stage would have a higher VE than that of a single-stage. See the formula.  I've seen a graph showing actual values of VE for air compression estimated for one-stage units as function of PR and % clearance that includes the other factors.

Since I cannot reproduce the graph, I'll give some values that will enable your own plotting of VE% as f(PR) the straight lines are the % clearances:

VE,%        PR           clea.,%         
0.96         3             0
0.945        4             0
94           3             2
90.5         3             4
88           3             6
91           4             2
87           4             4
82.5         4             6

One notices that even for 0% clearance the VEs are not 100%.
n in a piston compressor is always lower than Cp/Cv. For example, for air the conventional Cp/Cv=1.4, however, actual polytropic values are 1.3-1.35.

RE: efficincy calcs. for recip. comp.

Sir 25362 Chemical hasn't taken into account that we "dumb" mechanical engineers need a strate forward explanation.

Percentage clearance means that a relative clearance is used in that equation (I assume).  If my interpretation is correct than:

If a clearance is 1mm and cylinder bore is 100mm, the relative clearance is 1/100=0.01

Having the same clearance but half the bore size the relative clearance is 1/50=0.02

RE: efficincy calcs. for recip. comp.

(OP)
man this is why my calcs is not correct

RE: efficincy calcs. for recip. comp.

Hi Guys,

I would like to know how to calculate the Coefficient of performance for a vapor compression refrigeration cycle.

ephraimike.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources