Physics First?
Physics First?
(OP)
A physics First conference was held recently at Cornell, discussing the benefits of making Physics a 9th grade class in the US, rather than 11th or 12th. See http://members.aol.com/physicsfirst/ and http://www.news.cornell.edu/Chronicle/03/7.24.03/Physics_First.html
What do you think the benefits would be to our profession?
I think a lot of students get burned out on science during junior year chemistry, and never take physics. Yet Physics has a lot more relevance, I think, to everyday life. The average car driver needs to know more about inertia than fuel-air stoichiometry. Could Physics First lead to better drivers?
Closer to home, could it increase interest among high school students in science and engineering as careers? I think it may, simply because it would help show the relevance of the sciences to their lives. Also, since Newtonian Physics can be seen and felt and heard, it could be a better introduction to science than chemistry or geology or perhaps even biology.
Any other thoughts?
What do you think the benefits would be to our profession?
I think a lot of students get burned out on science during junior year chemistry, and never take physics. Yet Physics has a lot more relevance, I think, to everyday life. The average car driver needs to know more about inertia than fuel-air stoichiometry. Could Physics First lead to better drivers?
Closer to home, could it increase interest among high school students in science and engineering as careers? I think it may, simply because it would help show the relevance of the sciences to their lives. Also, since Newtonian Physics can be seen and felt and heard, it could be a better introduction to science than chemistry or geology or perhaps even biology.
Any other thoughts?





RE: Physics First?
I feel that one problem with Physics is that there aren't enough qualified teachers available not to mention teachers who actually make the subject interesting and motivate the student to learn own his own.
Chemistry, while certainly necessary as a pre-requisite for admission to many college and university programs is abstract and foriegn to high school students.
Biology, in my opinion is already represented quite well in the secondary education.
RE: Physics First?
RE: Physics First?
"A significant question posed at the Cornell conference was whether freshmen (described by one conference attendee as "really just eighth-graders plus a couple of months") have the intellectual capacity to handle some highly conceptual topics in physics, or other topics that could require a solid background in math. But the overwhelming consensus was that they have: "It's not so much that they can do it, as how do you modify your instruction so that they can achieve it," said Mark Vanacore of Albion High School, N.Y., speaking on math and physics integration."
If you look at the results from places that have tried it, you'll see that it can work. In one class, average freshman students taught physics by a biology teacher scored better on a standardized physics test than junior & senior year honors students. (http://members.aol.com/physicsfirst/Jane_Jackson_case_study_1.html)
RE: Physics First?
I would be in favor of any school or system that would challenge students, especially the brighter ones. Kids need to be challenged, or they get bored. If these bright children are challenged early in their school years, they will achieve more. My daughter is a good example. She was bored in 3rd grade, but in 4th - she was able to achieve high enough grades on her placement test to enter the "gifted resources" program. She loves it and has learned so much more this year it really is amazing. Thankfully, our school district has this program, but not all do.
RE: Physics First?
There will always be someone who asks why a wire that's twice the diameter is allowed to carry more than twice the amperage.
Or why a beam half as long is allowed to carry more than twice the load.
If the questions lead to physics explanations, that's okay too.
RE: Physics First?
My opinion of the Physics First educational scheme: For proper understanding, biology requires chemistry requires physics requires mathematics. Ergo, the course sequence should be
Math
Physics
Chemistry
Biology
Based upon the California high school graduates my company hires, any improvement in any of these areas would help.