×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

fuel ethanol production using cyclohexane as an entrainer

fuel ethanol production using cyclohexane as an entrainer

fuel ethanol production using cyclohexane as an entrainer

(OP)
I run a 60Kl per day fuel ethanol plant. Since 1982, benzene has been used as an entrainer. In June 2003, I switched to cyclohexane for health reasons. So far I have only managed to produce no more than 30Kl a day and with some struggles.
I know the decanting is not ok. Am failing to have the interface lower than the decanter overflow pipe. This means I am sending water to the dehydration column.
Some one out there who has worked with cyclohexane and had good results? Or maybe with cyclohexane the volumes are lower? I have lost two months of production.
Desparate!
Susan

RE: fuel ethanol production using cyclohexane as an entrainer

tughanite, I haven't had any experience with drying of fuel ethanol, but have dealt with other azeotropic distillations.
From tables it appears that the ternary azeotrope with CHX at 62.6 deg C contains less water, not more, than the one with bz. at 64.9 deg C.
If I got them right the published % wt figures for water/ethanol/carrier are :
7.4/18.5/74.1 and 4.8/19.7/75.5, for bz and CHX, respectively.
In order for the heavier layer to have a larger volume than expected one should look at the partition of ethanol, between water and CHX at the prevailing temperature. It could be checked in the lab, by mixing the components in the expected proportions while looking for the time taken for phase separation and the formation of a cleancut interphase.

It is possible that the mutual liquid-liquid diffusion of water, ethanol and carrier is slower with CHX than with bz. at the prevailing temperatures.

Other things equal, such a simple lab bench trial would help you to understand what's actually happening in the plant's decanter.

Good luck.

RE: fuel ethanol production using cyclohexane as an entrainer

Sulzer Chemtech Membrane Systems offer a debottlenecking solution with pervaporation. Pervaporation is a membrane technology used for the dehydration of bioethanol. It can be used alone (for the dehydration of fuel ethanol from 94 W% to 99.5w%) or in combination (for debottlenecking) with existing entrainer (C6) or mol.-sieves systems.
a general info is available under:
www.sulzerchemtech.ch/eprise/SulzerChemtech/ Sites/products_services/pervap.html
Feel free to ask for more info or sizing details,
pierre.strauch@sulzer.com

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources