×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Heat Exchanger Comparison

Heat Exchanger Comparison

Heat Exchanger Comparison

(OP)
I am currently working on a project which involves using heat exchangers in a closed loop system to increase efficiency at the plant. Water flowing through the exchangers will be heated up by steam. The team wants to use flat plate heat exchangers, however, i was wondering the benefits of using these instead of another model. Can anyone help with the pro's and con's of the various types? Thanks,
Lainey

RE: Heat Exchanger Comparison

Pros:
Very small per unit of heat transfered compared to other types of exchangers.

Approach temperatures can be very close.

Can easily change capacity by adding or removing plates if your needs change.

Plates are available in wide variety of materials to match your fluids.

Easy to clean.

Cons:
Lots of seal area to potentially leak.

RE: Heat Exchanger Comparison

lainey:

Here are some of the common features of PHE's (Plate Heat Exchangers):

Pros
1) Will probably be the lowest capital cost investment/ft2; maybe as low as 50% of a conventional Shell & Tube.
2) Very high efficiency; outstrips the S&T in its high heat transfer film coefficents.
3) With the low price you also inherit a stainless plate construction; this helps in combating corrosion and scaling.
4) Requires no expansion joints for thermal stress release; the plates adjust themselves.
5) Simple to dissasemble and assemble;
6) You can add future heat transfer area with a minimal of cost.

Cons
1) Strange "creature"; your maintenance folks are going to have to adjust and be trained on how to repair and care for this type of unit;
2) The uniqueness brings with it a dependency on successfully installing and maintaining the correct gastket material that is compatible with the service.  Otherwise leaks will develop in service.  This is by far the most frequent complaint - although, in all fairness, it can easily be overcome by diligent instructions and training.
3) You have to store and maintain spare plates and gaskets in your warehouse that are not in keeping with "standard" heat exchanger parts.  This takes getting used to.
4) PHE's are not competitive in all applications; however, in water service they are almost impossible to beat.
5) Most PHE's can't be mounted inside steel structures or skids because of their overhead maintenance requirements; they almost always wind up installed at grade level, on concrete pads or piers with drainage capability directly below them.

I hope the above summary is of help.

Art Montemayor
Spring, TX

RE: Heat Exchanger Comparison

(OP)
Thanks a lot guys! That is definitely a lot of help!
Lainey

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources