×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Integrating MEMS accelerometer output

Integrating MEMS accelerometer output

Integrating MEMS accelerometer output

(OP)
Hi,  I'd like to explore the use of a Micro-Electro-Mechanical System (MEMS), i.e. micromachined, accelerometer.

I'm interested in hearing about experience using one of these for "low g" applications.  

To experiment, I want to build a circuit using one of the 3-axis accelerometers from SGS Thompson (ST).  Each output would be coupled to two integrator op amp stages.  These outputs would be converted to digital (12bit?) and then read by a uP.  I know I can use analog or digital mux's to
minimize part count, but for now I'm just experimenting.

I have a lot of questions I'd like to get answers.  Here are a few:
 
1) Realistically, if I integrate the output (0-2.5v=neg g's, 2.5-5.0v=+g's) and integrate to get rate, and then integrate again to get position how close can I track the movement of a slow moving object over time given some of the temperature caused errors?
2) What is a good choice for an op amp part from Linear Technology, ST, or Intersil to use in integration of these output?
3) What are some techniques for compensating for temperature errors in the accelerometer, integrator stages, etc?

I'm intrigued by this technology and want to learn more.

Thanks

RE: Integrating MEMS accelerometer output

You should find a good text on navigation systems.

As for integrations, the big problem is DRIFT, particularly for slow movers

TTFN

RE: Integrating MEMS accelerometer output

I would watch this one carefully...

Integration is a smoothing process in the frequency domain so high frequency effects that you might see in the accelerometer data will not hurt you too much.The low frequency data adds a lot to the integration process...So good signal levels and linear frequency response helps..

So the high frequency is ok, the low frequency is hard but not impossible...why is this problem hard? The 0Hz Stuff.

If you are not careful, you will get killed by DC offsets...MEMS devices are notoriously bias unstable and hysteretic...If you are integrating analog then amplifier offsets and millivolt level inaccuracies in the accel will integrate over time to give you gross errors in velocity and displacement..Evan at 1V/G, 1mV is only 1mG which is at the bleeding adge of these devices today.

You problem is one of Inertial guidance. Think about why we have GPS at all if we could integrate accelerometers and gyros accurately..

Now, the good news....If you want to monitor slow moving objects and you want low to average accuracies, you can do this. If you want true accuracy over time...then you will have to calibrate very very carefully..

Temperature calibration of accelerometers use three sets of coefficients...

Bias
Scale
Orthogonality

Bias corrects for the drift in the 0G reading for temperature.
Scale corrects fot the sensitivity (V/G) change with temperature
Orthogonality corrects for misalignment between your sense axis and the sensor's sense axes over temperature.

Of these three, the first two will require second order or third order curve fits...At low temperature changes, you might get away a linear

The third rarely requires temperature calibration at all. But I do a linear just to be safe. Heck PC Boards bend over temperature!!..

The best commercially available Low G accelerometers in the world for inertial guidance are the Servo Quartz Flexure Accels...They provide us AT BEST with about 0.1 to 1mG total accuracy after corrections..even with a 0.1% error in the data....it does not take too long to integrate yourself into a wall....try doing some rough math assuming some ballpark values and see what kind of positional accuracy you get over time.

Also, keep you noise levels very low...integrating noise is always messy.
MG

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources