×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Soil Resistance on Buried Pipe

Soil Resistance on Buried Pipe

Soil Resistance on Buried Pipe

(OP)
I am seeking more knowledge of the behaviour of rubber ring jointed pipes in weak soils. If the soil is weak and thrust blocks are to be avoided thrust restraint fittings can be used at changes of direction. I would like to know of a procedure to calculate how far back from the bend can RRJ fittings rather than restraint type fittings be used.

WHat aprameters of the soil do I need and how do I go about specifying them so that the geotechnical engineers or soils scientist comes up with the right data.

Please no lectures on I should be using PE or other integrated pipe materials.

Sharing knowledge is a way to immortality

RE: Soil Resistance on Buried Pipe

Be careful with restraining joints in weak soils.  The pipe can and will fatigue due to lack of sufficient ability to resist the thrust loading.  Most thrust block designs and detail drawings are premised on fairly weak soils anyway.

I prefer to use a combination of restaining joints and thrust blocks, particularly on hydrants, 90 bends and tees.

KRS Services
www.krs-services.com

RE: Soil Resistance on Buried Pipe

you haven't stated your pipe material; rrjs will not reliably withstand longitudinal forces; options include circumferential insert in circumferential groove in spigot and socket or collar (not sure if these always work); see grp catalogues; and see also paper by des bowland through tyco website which describes tests to establish longitudianl friction on pe coated spigot and socket rubber ring jointed steel pipes.

RE: Soil Resistance on Buried Pipe

Stanier, I tried to send you an email but it was returned.  What is your email address?  Thanks.    

RE: Soil Resistance on Buried Pipe

This may be the first time for me, but I disagree with KRSServices. I think restrained joints make more sense than thrust blocks in weak soils - or at least are a valid option. Tables I've seen for thrust blocks are for moderate strength soils. In weak soils TB's can settle, rotate, etc so be careful with them as well. And as for using both restrained joints and thrust blocks, be aware that a different amount of deflection is needed to engage the thrust resistance. I read that it takes much less pipe movement to engage restrained joints - so if you have a "shared" system without full joint restraint a joint or joints may fail, then all the load would need to be taken up by the thrust block. I'd say better to use one system and make sure it's adequate.

RE: Soil Resistance on Buried Pipe

CarlB,

Your points are well taken.  I however, prefer to look at restraining joints not from the perspective of the soils, but more so from the pipe.  The pipes themselves are designed to contain the liquids, and accordingly, have certain safety factors built into them.  The restraining joint couplings utilize these safety factors to work within.  Consider a tee and the thrusting forces that are acting on the pipe in a pressure surge event.  In restraint, the tee itself has to withstand not only the forces of the liquid, but also must react to the resultant forces relative to the surrounding soil.  If this soil is weak, the tee and the restrained pipe location must be able to continually resist the forces acting on them (to deflect or shift).  A thrust block effectively transfers the forces acting on the tee and pipe to the bearing area on the soil.  You are correct, there are many cookie cutter tables for thrust blocks, and in many cases, aare designed for moderate to weaker soils.  However, as a component of the design, the soil logs will verify as to the suitability of those designs, and perhaps a larger bearing area is required.  I use restrained joints on hydrant assemblies because they are a really good backup to the thrust blocks.  You never know who is operating the hydrants, and on longer leads, the restrained joint is good insurance, but in my humble opinion, should not be a replacement to a thrust block.  What do others do?    

KRS Services
www.krs-services.com

RE: Soil Resistance on Buried Pipe

(OP)
Hi Ag 93  My email address is blenrayaust@yahoo.co.uk. SOrry for the delay but I have been away snow skiing.

Sharing knowledge is a way to immortality

RE: Soil Resistance on Buried Pipe

You might find the following paper useful "pipe anchorage for large diameter rubber ring jointed steel water pipe" on


http://www.ghd.com.au/papers/DBoland_pipe.pdf



Brian

RE: Soil Resistance on Buried Pipe

We design using megalug restraints.  On larger diameter pipe, we'll use a combination of thrust blocks and megalugs.

I agree that in weak soils, joint restraint is by far the better choice, however, both methods should be applied if the soil is questionable.

We also use anchor tees for all hydrants.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources