×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Low Volatge Circuit Breaker Reliability
2

Low Volatge Circuit Breaker Reliability

Low Volatge Circuit Breaker Reliability

(OP)
I'm looking at replacing an old 600V switchgear lineup with a new or refurbished lineup.  My question: Is there any sourcs of data that compare ANSI breakers from different manufacturers for reliability?  IE trip unit failures, false trips, breaker failures, etc.

Our first foray into the market for the modern lines of withdrawable power circuit breakers was a disaster, we had Merlin Gerin breakers which nuisance tripped when the load was below 15%.  We also had a couple of trip unit failures in the 7 years they have been in service. (we ended up sending all of these brekers back to be out fitted for external power supplies)

Personal experience with any of the recent lines of LV Power CB's would be appreciated, positive or negative.  As well I would be interested if anyone has experience with SACE CB's, particularly the Emax or Megamax lines.

RE: Low Volatge Circuit Breaker Reliability

Product reliability information is typically a closely guarded secret with most manufactures.  I'm not aware of any means of comparison based on field failure rates.

Depending on the number of breakers you have in service a couple of failures may be within the average, I wouldn't think it unusual if you have >50 installed.

ABB-SACE breakers are going to be similar in basic design as the Merlin-Gerin.  The only ANSI breakers of similar types are the SACE,SqD/Schneider/Merlin Gerin "Masterpact" and Cutler-Hammer "Magnum DS".  I think all of the other ANSI manufactures are still using a steel frame design. The composite frame gives these three manufactures an edge on short circuit ratings which is a function of the frame.  Trip units are another matter.  Manufactures periodically tweek their electronics.  The majority of high failure rates I've seen have been new or "improved" products that haven't got all of the bugs out of them. If you stick with a trip thats been on the market for a couple of years you should have good luck.  Be cautious of the latest greatest releases, being first to buy is seldom a pleasant experience

RE: Low Volatge Circuit Breaker Reliability

I've also had bad experiences with the Merlin Gerin Masterpact breakers (specifically, those sold in the US under the Square-D name but sourced in France and with French abbreviations on the trip units), including severely high rates of trip unit failures and lots of nuisance tripping on functioning breakers.  The typical trip unit failure mode was that the breakers would completely fail to trip, they essentially turned into electrically operated switches.  And to add insult to injury, replacement of the trip units took something like 14 weeks each time as they don't stock spares here in the US.

Sorry, I've got no other information on breaker reliability.

RE: Low Volatge Circuit Breaker Reliability

My company does electrical commissioning. We see more failures of new products from all manufacturers than I would think should be acceptable. I don't know that any one is better or worse than any others. GE issued a large recall on certain power circuit breaker trip units last year (due to failure to trip). As far as I know this problem was traced to a bad component and has been corrected.

RE: Low Volatge Circuit Breaker Reliability

(OP)
Thank You all.

What does the nuclear industry do to ensure switchgear reliability?  Would the above mentioned products meet these standards?

RE: Low Volatge Circuit Breaker Reliability

I can't speak for the nuclear industry.  But in general, if you're looking for a reliable Air Power Breaker, I'd stay away from the new plastic ones and stick with the traditional metal ones.  I have no data to back that recommendation up, it's mostly just a gut feeling. . . .

RE: Low Volatge Circuit Breaker Reliability

Just to clarify, there are three classes of "plastic" circuit breakers in the U.S. This discussion relates to power circuit breakers per ANSI and UL 1066. Examples of plastic power breakers are the Cutler-Hammer Magnum DS and MG Masterpact.

The second class of plastic breaker are called insulated case and are rated per UL 489 with much lower fault withstand ratings. Examples would be SquareD SE, GE PowerBreak and MG Masterpact (the Masterpact is available with either rating). They have double action operating mechanisms similar to a power breaker.

Molded case breakers are the third class are also rated by UL 489.

RE: Low Volatge Circuit Breaker Reliability

The US nuclear industry would not condone wholesale replacement of their switchgear.  The prices paid to keep spares of the original manufacturer are unreal.  But then, that's what it's all about!

RE: Low Volatge Circuit Breaker Reliability

Re:  "The US nuclear industry would not condone wholesale replacement of their switchgear."

I'm not quite following you -- it'd seem they must attach some expected lifespan, say 30 or 50 years, to the switchgear, after which they replace it -- no?  Or is the whole nuclear plant expected to be decommissioned at about the same time as the switchgear, under the assumption that the whole thing has reached its expected lifespan?

RE: Low Volatge Circuit Breaker Reliability

(OP)
What does class 1E equipment mean in reference to nuclear industry?  What does C37.82 and IEEE-323 require for LV switchgear above and beyond C37.13 & C37.20.1.

RE: Low Volatge Circuit Breaker Reliability

Peebee,
I believe your latter remark is true, except for your order of events.  Switchgear age is not the motivating factor.  The reactor is.  In general, parts availability for the "useful" life of a nuke plant,i.e., typically 40-years, are a requirement.  The question of decommissioning has not been adequately addressed.  If you abandon the reactor in place, then continued use of the facilities are not possible.  As you probably know, that 40-year limit is approaching.

For plants seeking life extension licenses, and there are a few, then, such extension considers replacement ancilliaries, but not on a piece-meal basis, nor on an original OEM basis.

Gordonl,
I do not work, per se, in the nuclear industry, at least not on the nuclear-side.  I have supplied, although not lately, ESD systems for generators and feedpumps, on the non-nuclear side.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources