×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

choice of Nk factor for soft clay

choice of Nk factor for soft clay

choice of Nk factor for soft clay

(OP)
I am trying to find references that are related to appropriate choice of Nk factor for use in interpreting undrained shear strength of soft (marine)clay.  Can anyone help me out?
Thanks

RE: choice of Nk factor for soft clay

The best reference/book I have come across is:

"Cone penetration testing in geotechnical practice by Lunne et al. (1997).  Blackie academic and professional, An imprint of Chapman & Hall."

Hope this helps

Robinson

RE: choice of Nk factor for soft clay

To Stolt

The previously mentioned manual by Lunne, Robertson and Powell has a considerable amount of info regarding Nk and Nkt cone factors.  The bad news is.....to the best of my knowledge this book/manual is out of print.

Another source that I have found to be quite usefull is by Jim Greig, Dr. Campanella and Robertson and is called "Comparison of Field Vane Results with other In-situ tests.  It is a paper/thesis published by the UBC Soil Mechanics group.

A few other items that might help you:

***  Nk and Nkt factors are site specific.  Be carefull applying a Nkt factor from a site in British Columbia to a distant area.  ***  

To the best of my knowledge the best?? or most common method I encounter of determining soil Su values involves the use of a Nkt factor. (Not Nk)  Since you are examining soft silts and clays then including the pore pressure measurements only seems appropriate.  The Nk factor uses the cone tip (Qc) reading while the Nkt factor uses the Qt reading.

A few vane tests will of course enable you to back calculate a site specific Nkt factor.

On some sites an examination of the Su/E.O.S ratio might reveal where the soil becomes N.Consolidated.

Hope this helps

Coneboy

RE: choice of Nk factor for soft clay

Look up "Mayne, Paul" on the internet search. He is a prof at Georgia Tech and has been interested in cone testing ever since I've known him.  He has a 'ell of a lot of papers out there discussing in situ testing of soils.  

RE: choice of Nk factor for soft clay

Yes, I agree with coneboy that Nkt is more appropriate than Nk because Nkt has been corrected for the "unequal area effect". Besides Nkt is a site-specific value. Therefore, it is suggested to refer to any publication regarding the Nkt that relevant to your site. In addition, please take note on the type of undrained shear test that been used for the correlation. Hope this will help you.
lhe

RE: choice of Nk factor for soft clay

hope this doesn't come a bit too late. I do agree that Nk/Nkt factor is site specific. From my experience, Nk of 15 to 20 is the safest bet, though it can be higher for heavily overconsolidated clay. What I normally do is, whenever possible, get the average ratio of qc over shear strength from lab tests and that will pretty much give me a rough estimate of the nk value. Hope this helps.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources