×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Velocity through Accelerometer without Drift

Velocity through Accelerometer without Drift

Velocity through Accelerometer without Drift

(OP)
    I’m making a project about Control and Optimization of the Electromagnetic Suspension Operation of a MAGLEV Vehicle.
In this, I need to measure inertial acceleration and make integration to get velocity of the Vehicle, but I’m having a PROBLEM WITH DRIFT.
I’m using the ADXL 105EB accelerometer to measure acceleration of the Vehicle in heave axis.
In the start, the Microcomputer with 12 bit A/D converter reads values of acceleration with   5000 Hz Sample rate by one minute and calculates the average (reference 0g).
The velocity is the integration of: reference 0g – acceleration in an instant. But after some seconds appear a drift in the velocity.

I’d like to know if would have some solution to measure this velocity without drift.
  

Thank you,

RE: Velocity through Accelerometer without Drift

Two thoughts.

First, unless you've thought out your accelerometer  mounting, the proportion of 'g' it sees is likely to vary a little as the vehicle pitches to go up or down hills (resolved components.....).  You may also pick up a proportion of vehicle acceleration in the other two axes.


Second: One solution may be to take an independent source of velocity (doppler?) or height(GPS?) and feed a low gain error signal into the velocity integrator to trim off the drift.  Careful adjustment of the gain allows you choose the best compromise betwen the short term accuracy of the inertial measurement, and the long term accuracy of the external reference.

(If you choose doppler, don't forget that what it measures is rate of separation between surface and source, which is not always the same thing as velocity).

Good luck.

A.

RE: Velocity through Accelerometer without Drift

ADXL 105EB has drift issues. Try Bosch.

RE: Velocity through Accelerometer without Drift

Hi,
  Cruise missles use accelerometers as inertial platforms but also use imaging information periodically to "zero" the positional errors generated by the accereration offset in the accelerometers.  If the acceleration offset error is e  (micro-g's), the positional error goes as 1/2*e*t^2  and the velocity error is e*t where t is the time period.  Do the math and you can begin to estimate the accuracy of the accelerometer required for a desired postion or velocity accuracy during a given time frame.  If the "mission" time exceeds the time for an allowable error, an external correction (as suggested by the previous reply)is required.   BTW: Inertial accelerometers like the Q-Flex by United Technologies/Sundstrand Data Control (??) can have offset errors of a few micro-g's ...but they cost thousands of dollars too!
   Automobile navigation systems use the same approach.  Accerelerometers can be used for short term dead reckoning during periods when GPS signals drop out.  This can happen in cities with restricted GPS reception.

   An Alternate Approach: Use a distance measurement and differentiate it for the speed.  Here you are susceptible to high frequency (high is relative to you application) noise in the differentiated result.  If your real signal frequency bandwidth is sufficiently seperated from the noise bandwidth, use a filter to remove the noise.  If the bandwidths overlap or your filter is low order (ie cheap), signal to noise ratio will be degraded.

   Accerlerometer Recommendation:  Micromachined capacitive accelerometers typically have lower offset errors than bulk semiconductor piezoresitive accelerometers.  This is why they are preferred for vehicle stability systems in automobiles.   They have offset errors on the order of 10's of milli-g's for a 1 g range. One source is VTI in  Helsinki, Finland.

  Good Luck,
Bruce Strachan

PS  
   If you find an absolute velocity sensor that does not depend on a surrogate measurement like acceleration or distance, please let us all know.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources