×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Combined Compression/Bending in a Column

Combined Compression/Bending in a Column

Combined Compression/Bending in a Column

(OP)
I'm looking at analysis performed by an engineer no longer with the company and I'm concerned that it's incorrect but I'm not confident enough to push the issue. I'd appreciate any input.

Structure consists of two 20-ft sections of 8-in pipe bolted together through 1-in flanges. Top section is sch 40, bottom is sch 80.

Loading is from an FM antenna array and windloads (approx 2 kip compression/30 ft-kip moment at base).

He disregarded compression and treated the whole thing as a simple Mc/I bending problem saying that it's OK because ó < Sy.

However, when I follow AISC Manual of Steel Construction approach for combined column loading, looking just at the lower sch 80 section, I find the eqns in sec'n H are > 1 which says the design is insufficient.

The reason for my lack of confidence is that the axial stress is only about 0.2 ksi which seems to say this thing is basically a vertical cantilever beam in bending so Mc/I approach is right.

I'm losing sleep over this and any help would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks!

RE: Combined Compression/Bending in a Column

You should be able to take advantage of the 1/3 increase in allowable stress when under wind loading. I interprete this 1/3 increase to mean that your interaction equation need only be less than 1.33.

By the way, what value did you use for your effective length factor (K)? If it's a straight cantilever K should be 2.1 per Table C-C2.1 in the Commentary.

RE: Combined Compression/Bending in a Column

How is it that 200 psi of compression stress causes the pole to fail the unity equation while ignoring 200 psi of compression does not?  There is something wrong here.  I get that the buckling stress is 9.35 ksi, so allowable axial compression stress is 4.88 ksi, so applied over allowable ratio for compression is just 0.04?

RE: Combined Compression/Bending in a Column

(OP)
Here's the summary of my analysis:

Top 20-ft section:
L = 240 inches
W(incl pole) = 930 lb, Flateral = 840 lb at middle of pole.

Bottom 20-ft section:
L = 240 in  A=12.75 in2, I=105.7 in4 r=sqrt(I/A)=2.88 in

W (incl pole) = 1060 lb, Flat = 730 lb at 180 inches from base of pole.


Therefore, looking at bottom pole:

Faxial = Wtop + Wbottom - Wbottom pole = 930+1060-870 = 1,120 lb

and fa = F/A = 1.1 kip/12.75 in2 = 86 psi

M = Flat top * (.5Ltop+Lbottom) + Flat bottom * 180
   = 840 lb * (.5*240 in +240 in) + (730 lb * 180 in) = 434 in-kip

and fb = Mc/I = (434 in-kip)(8.63/2 in)/(105.7 in4) = 17.7 ksi

Obviously very little compressive stress, mostly bending stress.
K=2.1 so KL/r = 175; Cc = sqrt(2*pi2*E/Fy =

sqrt(2*3.142*29000/36) = 126

Since KL/r > Cc, Fa = 4.88 ksi
Fb = .66Fy = 23.7 ksi

Plugging these numbers into eqns H1-1 and H1-2 gives 1.57 and 1.52 respectively.
Even setting fa = 0 only lowers them to 1.49 which still indicates failure.

I guess my concern is this:

  • The compressive stress is way below the allowable so it's A-OK as a column
  • Bending stress is well below allowable so it's A-OK as a cantilever
  • So, why does the combined approach predict failure even with compressive stress set to zero


Like I said, the guy who did the original analysis just treated it from an Mc/I < Sy perspective - no consideration of "pushing a rope" - and that's not OK. But, before I make an issue out of it I'd like to make sure my analysis is right.

Thanks for any and all comments.

RE: Combined Compression/Bending in a Column

If fa/Fa is less than .15 (your case) then Equation H1-3 governs.

RE: Combined Compression/Bending in a Column

(OP)
Thanks Steve.

In this case, H1-3 doesn't show an appreciable difference.

I think I found a flaw in my analysis, though. For the bending stresses, the equations have both an x and a y component. Because I have a uniform cross-section, Fbx = Fby. I erroneously also set fbx = fby. As it turns out, they are definitely not equal. I haven't run the analysis yet but I'm guessing that I'll be much more comfortable with the result at that point.

scofie - Thanks for the There's something wrong here comment. That helped me persist in looking for the problem.

RE: Combined Compression/Bending in a Column

may i ask why a mechanical engineer is designing a column??

RE: Combined Compression/Bending in a Column

(OP)
Sure, you can ask.

The straight answer is because the person who provides the money that keeps my family able to buy food, see a doctor, and from losing our home asked me to.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources