INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Member Login

HANDLE


PASSWORD
Remember Me
Forgot Password?

Come Join Us!

  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • Turn Off Ad Banners
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!

E-mail*
Handle

Password
Verify P'word
*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Partner With Us!

"Best Of Breed" Forums Add Stickiness To Your Site
Partner Button
(Download This Button Today!)

Member Feedback

"...I love the structure of the site. You start at the top, and drill down to what you want. Maybe I've been using Unix too long... :-) "

Geography

Where in the world do Eng-Tips members come from?
rguill5 (Petroleum)
12 May 03 20:58
I know that typical values for connate water saturation are anywhere from 15-30%.  However, I've seen some people using 3-6% initial Sw in their reserves calculations.  This seems very low to me.  The reserves predictions are in very clean, 1-2 Darcy rock.  Is this value too low?  They say that they are getting the Sw from the logs, but it just doesn't seem that you can get a connate water saturation that low.

Let me know what you think.

Start A New Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!

Promoting, selling, recruiting and student posting
are not allowed in the forums.
Posting Policies

LINK TO THIS FORUM!
(Add Stickiness To Your Site By Linking To This Professionally Managed Technical Forum)
TITLE: Petroleum production engineering Forum at Eng-Tips
URL: http://www.eng-tips.com/threadminder.cfm?pid=469
DESCRIPTION: Petroleum production engineering technical support forum and mutual help system for engineering professionals. Selling and recruiting forbidden.