×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Finite Difference vs. FEM: FLAC3D

Finite Difference vs. FEM: FLAC3D

Finite Difference vs. FEM: FLAC3D

(OP)
I have come accross a program for geotechical engineering called FLAC3D (http://www.itascacg.com/flac3d.html). It is said to be a 'Finite Difference' program. How a Finite Difference program is different from Finite Element programs that we use? Is there any special advantage of using such programs for geotechnical problems?

Any insight will be helpful.

Thanks and regards to all folks.

RE: Finite Difference vs. FEM: FLAC3D

Finite Difference methods apply a grid over the region and solve the Partial Differential Equation by approximating the derivatives via the Taylor series expansion and using differences as an approximation. For this method it is important that a uniform grid is applied over the region to reduce the errors by the differencing method. Finite Differencing methods are thus less robust for irregular shaped bodies than finite element methods which divide the region into separate elements to fit the region and use a variational approach to solving the PDE.
The benefits of FD methods are that it is easy to understand, easy to explain , easy to program, meshing is simple, and the error is known in terms of the remainder from the Taylor series expansion of the derivatives. It used to be commonly used in fluid dynamic methods mainly because of its stability, I believe, but FE methods are now used.
What the benefits of the software you mention are, I don't know, as all of the features mentioned are covered in most FE codes, unless it's modelling some phenomena not covered by FE methods which I can't see.  

RE: Finite Difference vs. FEM: FLAC3D

(OP)
Thanks corus. The very good explanation from you clarifies my doubts to great extent.

Thanks to Eng-Tips too that such things are possible in no time.

Regards.

RE: Finite Difference vs. FEM: FLAC3D

For Dynamic analysis, I could say that 99% of programs are a mix of FE to dicretize the space and FD to discretize the time (marching time).
Some people at U of Illinois are working in a true FE dynamic analysis discretizing space and time (kind a 4D analysis).

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources