×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Rule of thumb?

Rule of thumb?

Rule of thumb?

(OP)
I'm looking for documentation for a "rule of thumb" about sight distance obstructions that goes something like this:

From the travel lane of the approach, hold your hand out at arms length, thumb pointed upwards. If the apparent width of the object is more than twice the width of your thumb, it is a visibility obstruction.

Of course, it depends somewhat on the width of your thumb and the length of your arm.

Is there an accepted width of an object for it to be considered a sight distance obstruction? If so, it is probably an angular measurement rather than an abolute width, since a nearby narrow object can be as obstructive as a wider one farther away.

RE: Rule of thumb?

I'd be careful with that little jem.  I would use the general rules in the RTAC manual.  Crouch or squat to an approximate height of 1.05 m.  Using 300 m as a guideline (speeds of 60 mph or greater), look 300 m in the direction of the desired sight line relative to the centreline of road approach.  If you have a clear line of sight, you should be good to design the approach properly and calculate the actual sight line.  If it is obstructed, the design in that location likely will not satisfy the sight line test or stopping sight distance test.  A sight line should always be unobstructed.

KRS Services
www.krs-services.com

RE: Rule of thumb?

(OP)
I'm assuming you are saying that vehicles should be visible for your equivalent of AASHTO's Intersection Sight Distance. I can't argue with that. My question was, when is something wide enough to be considered an obstruction?

RE: Rule of thumb?

Something is wide enough when it exceeds the apparent width of a bike rider or pedestrian at a distance required for braking. For example if a car is travelling at 60km/h it may require 40m to stop, therefore at 40m from where the pedestrian is the driver should be able to clearly see the pedestrian.

Then do as KRS suggests and squat and check. No rule of thumb exists because most people cannot judge distances vs speed vs stopping, etc effectively. In my role as a road safety auditor, I quite often pace out distances, squat on the road, think about what problems may occur etc,and then make a subjective assessment.

Remember at speed, many drivers have very different reaction times, hence the difficulty in assessing what will or will not be an obstruction.

regards
sc

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources