×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

comparison of first and second order tet elements
2

comparison of first and second order tet elements

comparison of first and second order tet elements

(OP)
Hello, do you have any information or experience about the validation and comparison of the first and second order tet element results? Some body are asserting, that the linear tets are affording more real values. It acts mainly for calculation of die casting aluminium parts.
Thanks! Femac

RE: comparison of first and second order tet elements

Linear tetrahedral elements are of no use at all other than in a thermal analysis, possibly. Some programs actually prevent you from using them in stress analysis.

RE: comparison of first and second order tet elements

WHoever is asserting that first-order tets are giving better results is most certainly wrong.  First order tets should be avoided like the plague.  

Their formulation is not good, and I don't know of an FEA software company which does not harshly warn against using them.

NAFEMS has some good benchmarks which can be used to evaluate various elements; the easiest thing to do is some very simple tests--cantilever beams, etc--for which you can obtain a known theoretical solution.  When you do these tests, you will find that first order tetrahedrals yield very poor results.

Brad

RE: comparison of first and second order tet elements

Thanks Theanalyst,
It was usefull for me

Ciao
AbuAqel

RE: comparison of first and second order tet elements

I should acknowledge corus's point--in heat transfer first order tets are acceptable (I didn't mean to imply otherwise). My comments were relevant to stress.
Brad

RE: comparison of first and second order tet elements

I think first-order tets are giving better results in explicit dynamics.
Any comment?

RE: comparison of first and second order tet elements

First-order tets, explicit or otherwise, are still constant-strain elements and will yield overly-high stiffnesses (and result in poor results) and poor convergence.  

Second-order elements in contact can yield spurious contact stresses in many situations. This has to do with the implementation of contact algorithms as applied to 2nd order element formulation. In this case, contact-intensive problems (which often happen in explicit analyses) could yield questionable local contact stresses for second-order elements (although far-field responses should still be reasonable).

First order tets, in contract, may give apparently "cleaner" contact stresses, but the underlying formulational problems still exist, and I would not trust those first-order tetrahedral results.

Some codes have specially-formulated 2nd order elements which address the 2nd order contact issues.  In this case, these elements provide not only superior element response but also reasonable contact response.

In short, for explicit non-contact problems, 2nd tets are definitively superior, but for explicit contact problems they may have problems at the contact patch (which is addressed in some codes).

Brad

RE: comparison of first and second order tet elements

(OP)
To All:
thanks for your very usefull contributions. I made an opinion poll by our customers the european car makers, too. All are same opinion as above. I found out also other comparison literature in mean time.
Below is an adress about a very good comparison of all hexa and all tetra meshes for elastic and elasto-plastic analysis from Brigham University & National Laboraties.

http://research.et.byu.edu/cubit/Benzley,Perry,Merkley,Clark,Sjaardama.pdf


femac

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources