×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

R/C slab Bridge overhang design

R/C slab Bridge overhang design

R/C slab Bridge overhang design

(OP)
I have been given the task to analysis a R/C slab for a bridge deck overhang.  The overhang will be fixed on one end
(beam flange interface) and free on the other.  The top steel from the bridge slab is the main tension reinf. for the overhang.  The major load is an HS25 type truck.  I am using AASHTO spec. I believe that I can use membrane action and would like to distribute the wheel load longitudinally, more than that allowed by AASHTO (E=0.8*X +3.75).  Any thoughts?  I have heard of design charts (Broussard?), but am not familiar with these.  The overhang will not exceed 5ft, and I would like to stay away from grillage or FE analysis.

RE: R/C slab Bridge overhang design

If you are designing a bridge deck for a govenrment project, you will have to use AASHTO or the government requirements if more stringent. I would be greatly surprised if you are allowed to distrubute a wheel load over a greater distance than that allowed by AASHTO.

RE: R/C slab Bridge overhang design

For one of the best references to the design of bridge overhangs as you described follow the link below to the MoDOT website, bridge design manual and click on section 3.30 PDF file for a design example.  This is extremely useful for engineers new to bridge design.

In addition to the loads you've mentioned - the vertical HS25 load.  You will also have to look at two more situations.  First is the collision load acting on the safety barrier curb usually set at the edge of the overhang.  The collision load is defined in section 3 of AASHTO.  Secondly, you must check the interior positive and negative moment between girders.  The latter probably won't control until you encounter some very large girder spacings, but it should be ruled out by beginners.

http://www.modot.state.mo.us/bridgemanual/general.htm

RE: R/C slab Bridge overhang design

(OP)
Many Thanks Qshake...kudos to the MODOT for an excellent chapter to their Manual.
Several thoughts....AASHTO specs based on the Westergaard theory assumes the cantilever slab to be a rigid support, such that the moments at midspan are the same as the moments at bent lines.  But for modelling closer to actual behavior, the cantilevered slab is supported on a flexible girder, that may defect at midspan.  This deflection allows for more distribution width than that allowed for by AASHTO.  In Texas we normally see Prestress Girders Ty IV spanning at least 115ft.  In this case distribution width is different at midspan and bentlines.....This question came up for a non standard slab overhang for a radial span and chorded girders, where the overhang at midspan may calculated out to be greater than current highway standards.  Based on example calcs from MDOT chapter, AASHTO ok for my case.
Thanks

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources