Poloraziation Index
Poloraziation Index
(OP)
What should the PI of new 2400V 500HP motor be?
Ihave tested 7 motors and the PI`s range from 5.8 to 12.7.
These motors are single speed some were 900 RPM and some were 1200 RPM all were from the same manufacturer and none
have been placed in service.
Our plant standard is to test 2400V motors at1000 volts
would this explain the high PI? From what I have read PI`s
should be between 2 and 6. THANKS HYPRESS
Ihave tested 7 motors and the PI`s range from 5.8 to 12.7.
These motors are single speed some were 900 RPM and some were 1200 RPM all were from the same manufacturer and none
have been placed in service.
Our plant standard is to test 2400V motors at1000 volts
would this explain the high PI? From what I have read PI`s
should be between 2 and 6. THANKS HYPRESS





RE: Poloraziation Index
http://www.usbr.gov/power/data/fist/fist3~1/3~1_2.htm
for Table I and:
IEEE Standard No. 43 indicates the recommended minimum values of polarization index for a-c (alternating current machines) are:
For class A insulation - 1.5
For class B insulation - 2.0
For class F insulation - 2.0
RE: Poloraziation Index
I believe that a maximum limit was sometimes applied to older motors with Alsphaltic insulation (along with a minimum limit). New motors will not have that type of insulation.
RE: Poloraziation Index
If the PI on Bitumen/Alsphaltic insulation is very high then it is an indication that the system is dry. (bonding material).
Please follow IEEE 43-2000.
Regards
RE: Poloraziation Index
One another thing, is there any correlation between absorption co-efficient (60 sec value / 15 second value) and PI (10 min value / 1 min value) ? In some cases, I have found absorption co-efficient higher than PI and in other cases, just the opposite.
RE: Poloraziation Index
Electricpete is right. New motors may have very high numbers. The RTG values can run 50-60 gigohms with a PI of 15 or higher. At this level, PI numbers don't mean too much.
When the curve flattens or becomes erratic, we send the motor to the shop for service.
RE: Poloraziation Index
Both are ratios but the PI test allows the charging and absorption currents in an RTG test to decay so that only the actual leakage current is measured. In terms of a mathematical relationship; I have not come accross one as yet, however, it seems as if the DA provides more of a snapshot view of what is going on...in the insulation.
I would think that both tests are better than just one!
RE: Poloraziation Index
RE: Poloraziation Index
The PI/DA ratio is important,however;one other important aspect is the PI graph.I too use the PDMA/ASI Hi voltage megger or its MCE 1000 volt megger.I have had new motors that show a terrible graph and basically no Ratio or others that show just like yours very high rations.
The PI test is only one aspect of all the tests for motor condition.I would be very careful making a call on any motor solely on a PI value or Graph.
GusD
RE: Poloraziation Index
With the higher PIs mentioned on a new motor, especially one with VPI insulation, I would suspect moisture. I would try drying the windings and running the test again.
RE: Poloraziation Index
To all: Question about PDMA and resistance profile:
You get a lot more data when you do a PDMA check... but is it really useful? Has anyone ever seen a strange trend in the profile of resistance vs time which was:
#1 - Not reflected in 1-minute IR or 10:1 minute PI
AND
#2 - Indicative of an actual problem subsequently confirmed by internal inspection or some other reliable method.
I am evaluating PDMA for our plant. At this point I'm still skeptical.
RE: Poloraziation Index
We have been using PDMA tester MCE/MCEmax since 1995.
Our plant has 5 of these testers,they were all purchased in the last few years,the last one a couple of years ago.
If I was on the market for a similar technology,I would have a look at another tester on the market(ALLPROIV)
I got a video on these tester and I was impressed by its capability and more so by the low cost compairing to the PDMA.
Thanks
GusD
RE: Poloraziation Index
RE: Poloraziation Index
One thing I do know is that IEEE43-2000 does not apply any maximum PI limit to modern (epoxy or polyester) windings, which my knowledge includes all VPI windings.
The only thing that IEEE43-2000 mentions about high PI applies to older insulation systems. Specifically, section 11.2 contains the following text: "For varnished shellac mica-follium, or asphaltic stator windings, a very high PI (for example >8) may indicate that the insulation has been thermally aged and may have a high risk of failure. If physical inspection indicates dry or brittle insulation, it is best not to attempt cleaning or overpotential test. Failure may occur any time after machine is placed in service".
So in summary, IEEE43-2000 does not recommend rejecting modern windings based upon high PI (only older windings). Your discussion appears to contradict this. Your explanation seems like a plausible explanation for very high PI on a modern winding, but leaves me questioning whether a dryout would be necessary... haven't we accomplished dryout of the surface moisture during the 10-minute test.
I am curious if you have any additional info to suggest that a motor should be rejected upon high PI until drying creates a lower pi (rather than ignoring high PI on a modern winding as the standard would suggest)
RE: Poloraziation Index
product sold by BJM Corp.ALL-TEST IV PROtm2000.
I have only seen a brochure and a video of this tester and i was impressed with its simplicity and cost.
I have been using PDMA MCE since 1995,and the MCEMax for Dynamic testing since 1999.I like the tester but I dislike the cost.I bilieve the ALL- TEST IV PRO sells for about 25% of what PDMA sell for .
I cannot tell if this tester has the same capabilities as the MCE,I have not used it myself.
Thanks
GusD
GusD
RE: Poloraziation Index
I would agree that suspecting moisture due to a high PI for a modern winding would be a departure except the initial conditions were: new motors, never in service. I assumed storage of some kind, and while dirt, contamination, and deterioration and other normal enemies of insulation and causes of high PI are possible, I would expect moisture to be the most probable and easiest to check. Just performing a PI would help drive some moisture off.
We have had some experience with out PdMA test equipment and yes, we have seen things on the traces that have been correlated and confirmed by motor repairs. Our database is still pretty small, but we have had some good successes. Since we are a nuclear facility, if we see deterioration, we like to plan to perform maintenance rather than just be ready to do it when a motor fails. In that respect, it is much easier to justify our testing and trending costs.
RE: Poloraziation Index
My point is that high PI is NOT a condition that needs to be investigated for modern windings (it was for old windings), according to IEEE. I don't think that dirt, contamination, deterioration will give high pi (they may give low pi). Possibly surface moisture as you say, but if so, it is of a nature that is removed by the test itself and not of concern.
I work at a nuc plant to. I'm curious if you have been to LEMUG meetings... maybe we know each other.
RE: Poloraziation Index
I don't know if meant to say that the PI test would help
drive out the moisture.I don't think so.A PI for 10 min
at either a 1000v or higher,does not generate any heat to
drive out anything.
You have a better chance to get rid of moisture if you
hook up the Anti-condensation heaters.
If the amount of moisture is excessive you might have to use additional heat.
As for the PI levels you got I don't think it necessarily mean anything.
If you like, I could send you the PIs I did on 8 brand new
1500 hp motors /4160 volts.I did the test around 1996 and I too was using the PDMA tester.The PIs I got are definitely different.My E-mail =dalmeida.gus@syncrude.com
GusD
RE: Poloraziation Index
RE: Poloraziation Index
Yes I go to LEMUG, are you going in August?
I think we are dancing around the whole PI issue here. Hypress was looking for a good PI acceptance number for a new, unused motor. The ones he tested seemed to be high. Moisture seemed to be a possibility, especially for a modern winding. Hope to see you in Minneapolis.
RE: Poloraziation Index
RE: Poloraziation Index
Testing using voltages above the equipment rating may give more information about the quality of the insulation, but it will damage the insulation. Sometimes this damage will cause the insulation to fail during the test or shortly after when in service.
RE: Poloraziation Index
RE: Poloraziation Index
induction is right that 1kv on a 4kv motor is probably not enough. IEEE43-2000 specifies 2500vdc for a [non-destructive] insulation resistance test on 4kv motor.
Dan is right that 9kv on a 4kvdc motor is considered a Hi-pot test (potentially destructive) but still within the limits allowed by IEEE95 for hi-pot testing of service-aged windings.
I had an experience which taught me something about hi-pot testing.
We had an 8000hp 13.2kv motor refurbished. After final reassembly it was hi-potted to 18kvac and then run unloaded.
On receipt at plant we hi-potted to 24kvdc, which is a lower equivalent voltage level, considering the accepted 1.7 conversion factor between ac and dc hi-pot levels. We got to our final step 24kvdc and current was ~ 1.5 micro-amps. Without warning the test set tripped (trip setting 100 microamps). We investigated, tore down the motor, found a failure just outside the slot, required rewind. My conclusions:
#1 - Don't believe the 1.7 conversion factor. It is a thumbrule but not absolute truth.
#2 - DC hi-pot can damage a motor, no matter how careful you are.
Still we continue to do DC hi-pot on some critical motors. If it fails during test, we believe there was a probability it may have failed in service later. Overall you probably will rewind more motors if you do hi-pot testing, but you will also have less in-service failures. You have to weigh these against each other. In our case it is a no-brainer... cost of in-service failure of these particular motors can be approx 6 million dollars. Cost of a failure during test at plant outage requiring rewind is approx 1/10 of that (we have spare motor on-hand). We can afford to fail roughly 10 motors during testing if it prevents one in-service failure.
RE: Poloraziation Index
http://www.epri.com/corporate/products_services/project_opps/gen/1007270.pdf
for motor current signature analysis and power signature analysis
RE: Poloraziation Index
RE: Poloraziation Index
EASA "Principles of Large AC Motors" (2000) page 9-13 gives the following guidelines for interpretation of PI:
<1 - dangerous
1-1.5 - poor
1.5-2 - questionable
2-3 - Fair
3-4 - Good
>4 - Excellent
So from what I can see, IEEE and EASA both tell us there is no reason to be concerned about high PI (for modern windings).
RE: Poloraziation Index
Thank You,Radar. Duke Power
RE: Poloraziation Index
what is the relevance of motor current signature analysis and power signature analysis?
///If one spends $150,000 per the upcoming EPRI three-year project, then there will not be difficult to answer such a question. What if only EPRI knows?\\\
RE: Poloraziation Index
I would like to if anyone out there has ever removed a motor from service, because it had a HI PI ratio?
I personally doubt it, if one did not have any other
information to correlate to the high ratio .
In the old days impregnating varnishes could become brittle with age and cracked, giving cause to the HI PI ratios.Newer insulations and varnishes don't behave in the same way and a Hi PI ratio should be no cause for alarm.
If this high ratio is asociated with other possible downgrading conditions,it should be evaluated.
GusD