×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Cost Reduction by Adding HRG Units
2

Cost Reduction by Adding HRG Units

Cost Reduction by Adding HRG Units

(OP)
HI,

          Several folks on this forum, plus discussions with other electrical engineers, has convinced me of the need to install High Resistance Grounds (HRG) units on all of my 480 Volt and 2400 Volt ungrounded delta substations.

        I have been allow to purchase one unit, so far, and I am pushing for the $$ to do more. I keep reading reports that indicate the number of motor failures will drop after the installation of HRG units.

        Has anyone seen any published data from any studies on the improvements due to the use of HRG units, that I can translate into cost savings?  I know there are lots of  benefits, such as safety, improved reliability of the process, and improved power quality, etc.  It will help if  I can use some hard numbers to back up the cost savings.

Thanks.

RE: Cost Reduction by Adding HRG Units


To me, reducing a most basic, well understood, extensively documented engineering principle to mere short-run budgetary consequences is nauseating.  

Approach your seniors from this point of view—take two motors whose failure will choke production, and extrapolate from that.  You may find supporting information in IEEE Std 493-1997 Recommended Practice for the Design of Reliable Industrial and Commercial Power Systems.  
  

RE: Cost Reduction by Adding HRG Units

(OP)
busbar,

   Sorry it makes you nauseated. But that's life in the industrial corporate world today. Just trying to get all of the ammo I can. There are more good projects than $$ to go around. Those that build the best case first, gets the prize!!

Have a good day.

RE: Cost Reduction by Adding HRG Units


10-4 jburn—no argument here.  It just seems silly to not apply learning from other's extensive, well-documented experience.  

Sometimes it is slightly rewarding to stand back and see production loss from something so stupid.  I’ve given up trying to impress [or brown-nose] anyone with my ideas.
  

RE: Cost Reduction by Adding HRG Units


jburn, please understand that my comments are not intended to be personally offensive.
  

RE: Cost Reduction by Adding HRG Units

jburn,

You realize that High-Resistance-Grounding LV systems requires low-level ground-fault detection on all feeders, branch circuits, and utilization equipment.  Also, because they are designed to negate the effect of system capacitance-to-ground, there is no "one-size-fits-all" approach.

These considerations may blow your Benefit-to-Cost-Ratio's!  Please read the comments on the thread (sorry, I don't have access to the number, at this time):

"The Physics of Electrical Failure:  Ungrounded Systems"

RE: Cost Reduction by Adding HRG Units

Fault detection equipment does not need to be added at all, it only makes fault location easier.  There are many ways to assist in fault location starting with the origional ground lights and improving to the pulsing fault locators built into the high resistance grounding system.  Also high resistance grounding does not negate system capacitance, it uses its voalue to correctly size the desired fault current setpoint to limit transient overvoltages.  Also a high resistance grounding resistor with taps of 1 to 5 amps satisfies 99.44% of all HRG requirements so effectively one size does fit all.

RE: Cost Reduction by Adding HRG Units

I have not seen any published data indicating effect on motor failures yet. However HRG does reduce the Risk of Fire and Loss so if you ask your Insurance co. to do a Risk analysis for a properly installed and maintained Ground Fault protection system with an HRG, it might lead to a lower risk and hence lower premium which would allow you to write up the justification for converting all or more substations to HRG    

RE: Cost Reduction by Adding HRG Units

Suggestion: The age or aging of the power distribution and its load is also important. If the power distribution and its load are relatively new, there may be very little what could go wrong. However, if it ages, e.g. after two or three decades, the malfunctions/faults happen more frequently. At this time, the high resistance grounding should get a serious consideration, if it fits there. However, even the relatively new power distribution may require the high resistance grounding urgently, if the power supply is for more expensive processes and downtimes are costly.

RE: Cost Reduction by Adding HRG Units

jburn

There are reasons why over 7.5 million motors are sold each year.   If you want to have fault protection try low cost stand alone fault indicators  put them at critical loads or all loads.  Easy to install.  

RE: Cost Reduction by Adding HRG Units

jburn:

fault indicator part number

ABB  SC320R0200

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources