Smart questions
Smart answers
Smart people
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Member Login




Remember Me
Forgot Password?
Join Us!

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips now!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!

Join Eng-Tips
*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Donate Today!

Do you enjoy these
technical forums?
Donate Today! Click Here

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.
Jobs from Indeed

Link To This Forum!

Partner Button
Add Stickiness To Your Site By Linking To This Professionally Managed Technical Forum.
Just copy and paste the
code below into your site.

aujwc (Structural)
5 Feb 03 20:09
Say I have a steel angle section and I weld a rather heavy piece of steel plate to the flange and I want the section to behave as a composite section. I have to size the weld connecting the two pieces to be able to transfer the longitudinal shear stress. However I note that there is also a transverse shear stress which is equal to the longitudial shear.

Should I size the weld based on th combination of these stresses or simply consider the longitudinal stress. Textbooks I have seem to imply the latter is sufficient.
cyak (Structural)
6 Feb 03 8:50
Since we are talking about thin walled sections here I would say that the shear stress on legs is significant only in the direction perpendicular to thickness...
aujwc (Structural)
6 Feb 03 20:53
According to what I have studied, the longitudinal and the vertical (or transverse) shear stress are equal and are complimentary stresses so I can't see what would lead you to say that only one of them is significant.
prex (Structural)
7 Feb 03 2:16
This is the classical problem when calculating built-up I sections: you take the shear stress, whatever you call it, longitudinal or transverse (as you correctly noted, they are the same).
Both components of shear stress are present, under all circumstances, not only in the case you mention (except that of course in 3D problems you have 3+3 components). The ground for considering combination of direct and shear stresses is the Mohr's circle and a failure criterion, such as von Mises or Tresca.

prex

http://www.xcalcs.com
Online tools for structural design

vonlueke (Structural)
10 Feb 03 10:40
aujwc:  Interesting question.  First, you don't combine two mutually perpendicular components of the same shear stress.  These are actually one shear stress, always coexistent.

Secondly, AISC LRFD Specification, 1999, Appendix J2.4, tells us, in words, "Fillet welds are approximately 50% stronger in the transverse direction than in the longitudinal direction" (because notice there's a 50% increase in Eq. A-J2-1 when theta = 90 deg).

Therefore, for your stated scenario, you compute and check the weld shear stress only in the longitudinal direction (applied to the weld effective throat width).  This includes (and envelops) the vertical (transverse) shear stress in your weld.

And, by the way, regarding combining the weld longitudinal normal stress, AISC LRFD, 1999, Sect. J2.4, Table J2.5, footnote (e), says, paraphrasing, "For built-up member flange-to-web welds, ignore the tensile or compressive stress in the weld longitudinal direction."
cyak (Structural)
21 Feb 03 10:21
In thin walled sections one applies Jourowski's formula where you actually get a shear flow in each leg of the open thin walled section. What I mean is than the direction of the shear flow is parallel to the longitudinal direction of each leg and that in the transverse direction (along the thickness of the leg) the shear stress formation is negligible.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!

Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close