×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

modeling two plates stacked

modeling two plates stacked

modeling two plates stacked

(OP)
I am looking at a steel plate girder bearing on a steel/elastomeric bearing pad.  I am looking at the required thickness of a "sole plate" between the girder bottom flange and the bearing pad.  The bearing pad and sole plate are an inch wider than the girder flange, which complicates the situation.  To model it, I mentally turned it upside down and put a uniform pressure on a plate with the girder web and bearing stiffeners acting as a cross shaped support (I actually just modeled half of it).

The sole plate will be welded to the girder flange by fillet weld around edges.  I was planning to ignore this connection as far as the sole plate design, thinking it would be more conservative, and it would be difficult to count on that connection and it's effects, the fatige issues related to the weld, etc.  (comments ?)

I used calculated the plate thickness that gives me an inertia equal to I_flange + I_sole and used that for the plate elements that correspond to the bottom flange and sole plate together.  My intent is to look at the resulting moments and calculating the stresses in the sole plate manually with it's actual inertia.  I was planning on just taking Mx and My, calculate the RMS moment and then the stress.  Since I'm not going to make the plate the exact minimum required thickness anyway, I really just need to be confident that my results are a reasonable approximation of the plate stresses. What are your opinions on that?

Thanks,
Randy

RE: modeling two plates stacked

Randy:  I think your described method will give a correct result.  (Shouldn't "RMS" be "RSS"?  I assume so.)  And as I'm sure you know, your resultant moment MRSS would be distributed to each plate in proportion to its moment of inertia.  After algebraic simplification, this (interestingly) becomes the following, where Itotal = Iflange + Isole.

sigmaflange = (MRSS)(0.5 tflange)/Itotal
sigmasole = (MRSS)(0.5 tsole)/Itotal

You could, as you described, extract moments to obtain MRSS.  You might alternately consider using von Mises stress, sigmavm, directly from your model instead of extracting moments.  It might give you about the same or a conservative result.  As such, the resultant moment would then be MRSS = (sigmavm)(b)(telem^2)/6, where telem = thickness of plate finite elements in your model, and b = 1.0 mm (i.e., one unit of plate width).

I think your described method will give a correct and conservative result for bending stress.  Concerning bearing stress, the length of web in bearing should also be checked against an applicable design code to ensure bearing stress on the web is code-compliant.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources