×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Shotcrete Retaining Wall with Tiebacks

Shotcrete Retaining Wall with Tiebacks

Shotcrete Retaining Wall with Tiebacks

(OP)
I have the task of designing a series of retaining structures for a roadway stabilization. The "at-rest" lateral earth pressures are rather high(110 pcf max, as determined by a geotech). I am looking at both soldier pile walls with tiebacks, and shotcrete walls with tiebacks. The front face of the wall will be completely buried. This fact makes me lean towards shotcrete, because of lagging longevity concerns(The wall is permanent, with a planned life of 50+ years). The slope above the wall is horizontal, there is a 2' surcharge from the roadway above, and the water table is well below the limits of work. For scale, the walls range in height from 15'-30'.

Which solution would you suggest?

How do the two walls compare cost-wise?

Any additional comments or suggestions?

Thanks!


RE: Shotcrete Retaining Wall with Tiebacks

With the high earth pressure (110 pcf/vf) you have, I assume this is an unstable slope (landslide condition). Correct?  If so, you need to determine the tieback force and anchor length needed to give you the required factor of safety for slope stability.  I'm not sure why your geotech is calling for at-rest pressures.  At-rest pressures are not used in landslide control walls.  They are usually not used in regular tiedback or cantilevered sheeting walls either because sheeting walls are usually flexible enough to develop active earth pressures.

I recommend you check out some of the many types of anchored walls being built by Schnabel Foundation Company.

Go to www.schnabel.com

If you contact one of their local offices, you can get some good advice for your particular project.

RE: Shotcrete Retaining Wall with Tiebacks

(OP)
Thanks for your response.

Yes, a landslide condition does exist. As a result of our original discussion with the geotech we decided to use the "at-rest" pressure. This was because we weren't sure which wall type we were going to use. I agree that the wall will move, and therefore the "active" pressure may be used. Unfortunately, the geotech already reduced his values, leaving the "active" pressure at 110 pcf, and reducing the "at-rest" from 165 pcf to 110 pcf. Are these numbers reasonable? They seem VERY high.
I have already determined the horziontal and vertical spacings of the tiebacks, along with the lock-off forces, the tieback diameters, and the bonded lengths.

What are the benifits of a shotcrete wall -vs- a soldier pile wall with lagging? Any idea on a cost difference?

RE: Shotcrete Retaining Wall with Tiebacks

If it's a landslide condition, the wall should be designed to properly distribute the anchor load required to provide the necessary factor of safety for stabilizing the landslide. The required tieback force will most likely be much more than that calculated using active pressures.  And, the pressure distribution on the back of the wall will not be triangular as it appears your geotech is suggesting with his 110 pcf (triangular?) load.

Again, I recommend you talk to someone in the landslide wall design/build business - such as Schnabel.  Their web site has a number of project examples.  Also, to stabilize the landslide, you may not actually need a traditional "wall".  Anchors can be installed without soldier beams or lagging and still stabilize the slope.

Go to  http://www.schnabel.com/schnabel/landslide.shtml

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources