×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Restraints of crane

Restraints of crane

Restraints of crane

(OP)
Hello!
I am new to the forum, but need some help.

I am currently working on a project where i am designing a movable container crane. The design is fairly simple and resembles a straddle carrier or mobile boat lift. I am currently working on the structural analysis and for one of the load cases i am simulating a crash. I have the energy balance and spring constant down but i am having some trouble defining the restraints of the "wheels". The case is that the crane is colliding with one leg. My proposition per now is this:

3 legs free in x,y and locked in z. 1 leg locked in x,y,z and rotation. I have a feeling this is not the best solution but as i said i am having some trouble coming up with something that works better.

RE: Restraints of crane

Simulating a crash - i.e. one leg/wheel hitting a solid object? Not sure about the physical reality of locking z-axis motion of all the wheels, in real collisions the vehicle can/may/will rotate about its center of mass and some or all the wheels may lift as a result. Why not model the collision with the center of mass of the vehicle fixed?

RE: Restraints of crane

I don't think you've constrained rigid body motion; I think you need a second x- or y- to react the Mz (multiple z- react Mx and My). The other thing to watch for is tension loads on the wheels.

I'd suggest supporting each wheel on 3 rods of some stiffness and constraining the far ends of the rods; to give the wheels finite stiffness. Then ask yourself "could some of these wheels move?".

another day in paradise, or is paradise one day closer ?

RE: Restraints of crane

(OP)
I am working in SAP2000 and having trouble finding a way to restrain the center of mass (even tho that probably would have been ideal. I am looking for worst case scenario, rb1957 do any of you have any experience working in SAP2000 and have any suggestion on how to do this? I can upload the file if you want.

RE: Restraints of crane

no, sorry.

another day in paradise, or is paradise one day closer ?

RE: Restraints of crane

laserlassie,

i suggest to leave that 1 leg that hits an object free to rotate in whatever direction it wants, even torsion so to say

RE: Restraints of crane

(OP)
How would you restrain the rest then? I can add a torsion load equal to that of the friction torsion.

RE: Restraints of crane

first you have to constrain the rigid body freedoms, 6 degrees of freedom. As posted you are only constraining 5.

another day in paradise, or is paradise one day closer ?

RE: Restraints of crane

(OP)
You mean constraining the entire body in 6 degrees? Or just the one leg? Because i thought i had it restrained in all 6, X,Y,Z and R1, R2, R3

RE: Restraints of crane

yes, that's the way i simulate such situations: constrain the entire body and than add a force to the leg against the direction the body moved
then simulate and find out xyz deflections and 3 rotations of the leg

So look at this problem as if the crane is in rest and a object hits that one leg

RE: Restraints of crane

well that's not the way I do it. Your approach (as I understand it, fixing the four supports) over constrains the model and builds into your answer fictitious redundant (self-cancelling) forces. To properly (IMHO) restrain rigid body motion you need to remove 6 degrees of freedom, one point have x,y,z; a 2nd x,y; and a 3rd x ... or some combination depending on your co-ord system.

Constraining all 4 points in z is an acceptable compromise (saying the flat base remains flat) and constrains 3 freedoms (Fz, Rx, Ry). So you need 2 x and 1 y (or 1 x and 2 y) to take out the other 3 freedoms (Fx, Fy, and Mz).

Better than hard (infinitely stiff) nodal constraints is to apply a finite stiffness at each support. My suggestion is three orthogonal rods at each support point, and hard constrain the far ends of these rods.

another day in paradise, or is paradise one day closer ?

RE: Restraints of crane

No, fixing all four supports is not what I mean. I suggest fixing the crane frame in a location as close to its C.O.G.
Then only add a collision force at one leg.
Then simulate and conclude what deflections and stresses that one leg will show.

Your method of adding orthogonal rods will also work by the way.

RE: Restraints of crane

ok, I see that ... just turns the problem on it's head.

another day in paradise, or is paradise one day closer ?

RE: Restraints of crane

(OP)
How far is this from my idea of restraining one leg in 6 freedoms and dividing the collision force on the other 3? I really appreciate the help, i will look into your suggestions tomorrow!

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources