Non ASME standard flange design
Non ASME standard flange design
(OP)
I am a trainee in the Static Equipment design of the Mechanical department. Currently, I have been provided the task of studying the applicable codes for the design of Heat Exchanger and designing a BEU type heat exchanger.
My question is that are there any guidelines or restrictions for the design of a Non standard flange ? I am currently pursuing this task, and I have designed a flange in a software, and the flange is not failing. Also, I have checked manually, and it turned out as not failing (as per ASME BPVC Section VIII division 1, appendix 2). However, I am worried about the dimensions as in I might have gone too far in selecting the dimensions for the iterative process of flange design.
My question is that are there any guidelines or restrictions for the design of a Non standard flange ? I am currently pursuing this task, and I have designed a flange in a software, and the flange is not failing. Also, I have checked manually, and it turned out as not failing (as per ASME BPVC Section VIII division 1, appendix 2). However, I am worried about the dimensions as in I might have gone too far in selecting the dimensions for the iterative process of flange design.





RE: Non ASME standard flange design
"However, I am worried about the dimensions as in I might have gone too far in selecting the dimensions for the iterative process of flange design."
Not sure what you mean by this statement.
Regards,
Mike
The problem with sloppy work is that the supply FAR EXCEEDS the demand
RE: Non ASME standard flange design
Once you are completely comfortable with how Appendix 2 works (or Div. 2, Part 4.16 which I like very much) you can proceed with using commercially available software. I always like to validate what the commercially available software calculates, or at least a thorough audit of the calculations (assuming they are clearly shown) so that I can convince myself that the design was performed in accordance with the Code.
RE: Non ASME standard flange design
Thank you AWDMIKE for your suggestion. I will follow that procedure.
RE: Non ASME standard flange design
Since I have designed many non-standard flanges from 60" to 120" for pressure vessels, the starting point is to pick a similar flange dimensions and be proportional to it. I use Taylor Forge as a go-by for flange greater than 60".
key points are:
Decide gasket type and dimensions in advance. Look for B16.5 and B16.47 series A or B to see how gasket dimensions are specified. Then come up with something similar or in the range, especially the gasket width which impacts the stress calculation.
pick the number of bolting and size that are similar to any standard. The bolting spacing is important. So take a look from any standards to see how they decide spacing relative to bolt size. You don't want large spacing that may tend to leak.
Watch out the space between bolt hole to large end of hub. It must be sufficient for nut, bolt tensioner or power tongue. You can also look from standard to see what is the space relative to bolt size. I always select the largest one to be safe.
Decide the OD of the flange. This is simple. It is relative to bolt size. So again look for standard to see the spacing and pick a reasonable one. I always select the largest one.
Flange calc is complicate with many factors to play around including hub thickness at large end/small end and hub length. Commercial program will take care of these including providing minimum spacing to hub and between bolts, and check the rigidity per Appendix 2 which is very important. Also don't forget to check stress in sitting condition. Commercial program will take care of that.
RE: Non ASME standard flange design
Begin calculation with split loose flange, without hub, the simplest and cheaper ones.
Regards
r6155
RE: Non ASME standard flange design
Not sure if you are aware but the bolt quantities should always be in multiples of 4. TEMA tables provide a reasonable starting point for bolt quantities and spacings (circ and radial). A lower number of larger diameter bolts is better than a higher number of smaller diameter bolts.
RE: Non ASME standard flange design
Jtseng123, your answer explains it all and I shall follow that path, using a spreadsheet tool and then cross verify it with a software output.
RE: Non ASME standard flange design
Hi BJI,
I thought the contrary was recommended, regarding flange leakage aspect. Can you explain to which aspect of the bolted flange joint assembly design your consideration applies?
best regards,
tigny
RE: Non ASME standard flange design
I referred the pressure vessel design manual by Dennis Moss (3rd ed.) for flange design and found that tigny might be on the right path. To present in brief, the manual says that for low pressure equipment, the large diameter bolts would result in an increased bolt circle diameter, which would increase the moment arm, increase the total moment and hence thicker flange and hub(if considered) would be required. So for low pressure equipment, it is advisable to go for large number of smaller diameter bolts instead of a small number of larger diameter bolts. Though it would increase the assembly/disassembly time, it would take care of the leakage as the bolt spacing would be lower.
For high pressure, the area requirement for the bolts is higher, and so the bolts need to be of larger diameter. In this case, a proper analysis of the quantity and size of the bolts, bolt spacing and the bolt circle diameter needs to be done.
Please guide me if I am in the wrong understanding.