×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Non ASME standard flange design
3

Non ASME standard flange design

Non ASME standard flange design

(OP)
I am a trainee in the Static Equipment design of the Mechanical department. Currently, I have been provided the task of studying the applicable codes for the design of Heat Exchanger and designing a BEU type heat exchanger.

My question is that are there any guidelines or restrictions for the design of a Non standard flange ? I am currently pursuing this task, and I have designed a flange in a software, and the flange is not failing. Also, I have checked manually, and it turned out as not failing (as per ASME BPVC Section VIII division 1, appendix 2). However, I am worried about the dimensions as in I might have gone too far in selecting the dimensions for the iterative process of flange design.

RE: Non ASME standard flange design

Shashvat, other than some limitations on the hub proportions, I am not aware of any particular dimensional restrictions imposed by Apx 2. You should follow dimensions concerning bolt circle, spacing and flange OD as per TEMA Table D-5 / D5M. Other than that, your goal is to design the smallest, most compact flange that will do the job.

"However, I am worried about the dimensions as in I might have gone too far in selecting the dimensions for the iterative process of flange design."

Not sure what you mean by this statement.

Regards,

Mike

The problem with sloppy work is that the supply FAR EXCEEDS the demand

RE: Non ASME standard flange design

Ideally you should create a spreadsheet or worksheet (implying Excel or Mathcad, or other) so that you can go through the entire process and understand what impact changing certain parameters has on the overall flange. What I would also do is to have your spreadsheet / worksheet calculate the weight so that you can get a feel for how much more material (and subsequently, cost impact) you will have.

Once you are completely comfortable with how Appendix 2 works (or Div. 2, Part 4.16 which I like very much) you can proceed with using commercially available software. I always like to validate what the commercially available software calculates, or at least a thorough audit of the calculations (assuming they are clearly shown) so that I can convince myself that the design was performed in accordance with the Code.

RE: Non ASME standard flange design

(OP)
Thank you SnTMan for your guidance.

Thank you AWDMIKE for your suggestion. I will follow that procedure.

RE: Non ASME standard flange design

2
My general advice, may not be applicable to heat exchanger:

Since I have designed many non-standard flanges from 60" to 120" for pressure vessels, the starting point is to pick a similar flange dimensions and be proportional to it. I use Taylor Forge as a go-by for flange greater than 60".

key points are:
Decide gasket type and dimensions in advance. Look for B16.5 and B16.47 series A or B to see how gasket dimensions are specified. Then come up with something similar or in the range, especially the gasket width which impacts the stress calculation.

pick the number of bolting and size that are similar to any standard. The bolting spacing is important. So take a look from any standards to see how they decide spacing relative to bolt size. You don't want large spacing that may tend to leak.

Watch out the space between bolt hole to large end of hub. It must be sufficient for nut, bolt tensioner or power tongue. You can also look from standard to see what is the space relative to bolt size. I always select the largest one to be safe.

Decide the OD of the flange. This is simple. It is relative to bolt size. So again look for standard to see the spacing and pick a reasonable one. I always select the largest one.

Flange calc is complicate with many factors to play around including hub thickness at large end/small end and hub length. Commercial program will take care of these including providing minimum spacing to hub and between bolts, and check the rigidity per Appendix 2 which is very important. Also don't forget to check stress in sitting condition. Commercial program will take care of that.




RE: Non ASME standard flange design

Shashvat
Begin calculation with split loose flange, without hub, the simplest and cheaper ones.

Regards
r6155

RE: Non ASME standard flange design

Typically heat exchanger flanges have increased thickness, exceeding the App2 calculated thickness, to allow for thermal effects. This would require a joint integrity assessment at the design stage (including the transient thermal effects by using commercial software, WRC 510 or FEA), or possibly following some rules of thumb for flange thickness increase (if validated for the application). A heat exchanger flange that has high rotation, even below the App2 rigidity check limit, will most likely have issues with thermal effects.

Not sure if you are aware but the bolt quantities should always be in multiples of 4. TEMA tables provide a reasonable starting point for bolt quantities and spacings (circ and radial). A lower number of larger diameter bolts is better than a higher number of smaller diameter bolts.

RE: Non ASME standard flange design

(OP)
Thank you jtseng123, r6155, and BJI for your insights.

Jtseng123, your answer explains it all and I shall follow that path, using a spreadsheet tool and then cross verify it with a software output.

RE: Non ASME standard flange design

Quote (BJI)

A lower number of larger diameter bolts is better than a higher number of smaller diameter bolts.

Hi BJI,

I thought the contrary was recommended, regarding flange leakage aspect. Can you explain to which aspect of the bolted flange joint assembly design your consideration applies?

best regards,

tigny

RE: Non ASME standard flange design

(OP)
Hi BJI and tigny

Quote (BJI)

A lower number of larger diameter bolts is better than a higher number of smaller diameter bolts.


I referred the pressure vessel design manual by Dennis Moss (3rd ed.) for flange design and found that tigny might be on the right path. To present in brief, the manual says that for low pressure equipment, the large diameter bolts would result in an increased bolt circle diameter, which would increase the moment arm, increase the total moment and hence thicker flange and hub(if considered) would be required. So for low pressure equipment, it is advisable to go for large number of smaller diameter bolts instead of a small number of larger diameter bolts. Though it would increase the assembly/disassembly time, it would take care of the leakage as the bolt spacing would be lower.

For high pressure, the area requirement for the bolts is higher, and so the bolts need to be of larger diameter. In this case, a proper analysis of the quantity and size of the bolts, bolt spacing and the bolt circle diameter needs to be done.

Please guide me if I am in the wrong understanding.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources