Interpretation of International Building Code 1006.2.2.1 for egress requirements based on BTUH input
Interpretation of International Building Code 1006.2.2.1 for egress requirements based on BTUH input
(OP)
When determining the number of exits from a boiler, incinerator, or furnace room, when referring to the maximum 400,000 BTUH input capacity, does "any" indicate a single piece of equipment or an aggregate of all the equipment in the room?
Example would be if I had 3 domestic water heaters with input of 199,000 BTUH in a room, would I have to have two exits from the room?
I have seen interpretations of both.
Wondering what anybody else has encountered.
Example would be if I had 3 domestic water heaters with input of 199,000 BTUH in a room, would I have to have two exits from the room?
I have seen interpretations of both.
Wondering what anybody else has encountered.





RE: Interpretation of International Building Code 1006.2.2.1 for egress requirements based on BTUH input
RE: Interpretation of International Building Code 1006.2.2.1 for egress requirements based on BTUH input
RE: Interpretation of International Building Code 1006.2.2.1 for egress requirements based on BTUH input
RE: Interpretation of International Building Code 1006.2.2.1 for egress requirements based on BTUH input
The 2015 IMC defines boiler room as, "A room primarily utilized for the installation of a boiler." - not a lot of help there. It does define a boiler in a way which would rule out any domestic hot water heater.
However, in my neck of the woods (Ohio, USA), they have added a section to IMC 10001.1 to make applicable any boiler, water heater, etc. that is within the scope of the Ohio Boiler and Pressure Vessel Rules. In that, water heaters can be defined as boilers if they meet one of the following criteria,
Have an input greater than 200,000 BTUH,
Water temperature greater than 210 F
Nominal storage of greater than 120 gallons
So, it doesn't take a whole lot, at least in Ohio to have a water heater as a boiler. Throw a few of those and some heating hot water boilers into a room and the aggregate value could exceed 400,000 BTUH.
Recently, we did ask the AHJ how they interpret it and the response was it applies to individual pieces of equipment, not an aggregate.
RE: Interpretation of International Building Code 1006.2.2.1 for egress requirements based on BTUH input
RE: Interpretation of International Building Code 1006.2.2.1 for egress requirements based on BTUH input
Water heaters don't operate that high, but in Ohio, the criteria is how they further define boilers. Domestic water heaters can have inputs greater than 200,000 BTUH and storage volumes more than 120 gallons.
In fact, there used to be what were called "Ohio Specials" which had an input of 199,000 BTUH, which got them out of the "boiler" designation.
RE: Interpretation of International Building Code 1006.2.2.1 for egress requirements based on BTUH input
I misread that. It would make more sense if it said met all three criteria.
RE: Interpretation of International Building Code 1006.2.2.1 for egress requirements based on BTUH input
Although, interestingly, there are several models at 199,900 BTUh http://www.noritz.com/products/nrcp1112/
TTFN (ta ta for now)
I can do absolutely anything. I'm an expert! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BKorP55Aqvg
FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies forum1529: Translation Assistance for Engineers Entire Forum list http://www.eng-tips.com/forumlist.cfm
RE: Interpretation of International Building Code 1006.2.2.1 for egress requirements based on BTUH input
RE: Interpretation of International Building Code 1006.2.2.1 for egress requirements based on BTUH input
I tend to agree with your opinion, but when you are with an architect and tell them they need to provide two means of egress when to do so would mean making the room bigger - they tend to balk. It is the age old battle for square footage for mechanical equipment.
Since it is a Ohio (International) Building Code issue (referencing the Ohio Boiler Code), we asked the Ohio Building Code official who is in charge of opinions/interpretations related to MEP items and the response was "individual" not "aggregate".