×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Retaining wall design in California

Retaining wall design in California

Retaining wall design in California

(OP)
The California Building Code (the UBC97 code with the state's additional guidelines) states, retaining walls over 12 ft must be designed for earthquakes--a quake with a 500 yr recurrence interval.

The peak acceleration for the quake is 0.65 gravities.  Using this acceleration in the Monobe Okabe equation results in RW's with a stability F.S. >8 under normal service conditions.

IS THERE AN ALTERNATIVE EQATION THAT IS MORE CONSERVATIVE THAN THE MONOBE EQ?  SHOULD THE PEAK ACCELERATION BE USED IN THE EQUATION?  IS THERE ANY GUIDANCE FOR WHAT "EARTHQUAKE DESIGN FOR RETAINING WALLS" ENTAILS?

P.S. The CBC offers virtually no guidance.  The walls will result in NO collateral damage if they fail.  The height of the wall varies and it will have a maximum height of 30 ft.  The soil is typical sandy gravel. Ground water is not an issue.



RE: Retaining wall design in California

Are you sure this wall is 30 ft tall? If so, this is a serious retaining wall.

RE: Retaining wall design in California

(OP)
No bridgeboy, the wall is 25 feet high--my mistake.  Yes this is a serious retaining wall.  Unfortunatley I think I've posted the question in the wrong forum.

I am reposting it in the "earth retention engineering forum."  With the correct height of 25 feet.

RE: Retaining wall design in California

The AASHTO Design Standards may help you a little here. If you don't have them see if you can find a copy at CalTrans.  My recollection is that the Monobe-Okabe pseudo static method is not considered valid for peak ground accelerations greater than 0.40 g. For you case you may need to consult a geotechnical engineering capable of doing a dynamic analysis of this wall.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources