×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Blowdown vessel water inlet distinctions - Clarification needed

Blowdown vessel water inlet distinctions - Clarification needed

Blowdown vessel water inlet distinctions - Clarification needed

(OP)
Hello,

Currently I'm scoping a new blowdown vessel for our facilities boilers. I am reading up on Blowoff designs, and including the existing one we have on site, there are 2 distinct inlets: one for Continuous blowdown and one for intermittent blowdown.

While the designs specify this, and companies that build these vessels make a conscious effort to separate them I cant find specifically why. I am on board with this design logically,but I know that the piping designers will want to consolidate the CBD and IBD lines to a single run of pipe to save on costs.

I want to avoid that from happening if at all possible, but I have yet to find any ASME codes or otherwise in CSA to justify it yet. Is there any other resources I can reference?

RE: Blowdown vessel water inlet distinctions - Clarification needed

"...companies that build these vessels make a conscious effort to separate them I cant find specifically why..." For a short reply, intermittent blowdown which are normally done manually(alto. automatic controls could be used at a cost) when the boiler load is consistent throughout day and night such as for heating purposes. When boiler load have a large variation (and if you graph the fluctuating load for let's for a month period, this load chart will have a seesaw appearance) it would be difficult for the operator to control contaminant levels therefore a continuous blowdown would be mostly beneficial. Such fluctuating loads would be mostly found in industrial facilities whereby steam production would be for processes and heating.

RE: Blowdown vessel water inlet distinctions - Clarification needed

Remember, all steam boilers generate solids in the boiler water

In large boilers, continuous blowdown systems transport water from the main steam drum to a separate vessel where flash steam is harvested and returned to the system. Dissolved solids go to waste. This system is necessary to control boiler water purity and control internal corrosion.

Intermittent blowdown systems are taken from the bottom of the boiler (mud drums) and are the responsibility of the boiler operator. This system removes the "big chunks" that will accumulate and eventually ruin proper heat transfer and allow accelerated corrosion. All of this water and solids must go to a separate vessel and to waste

Your piping designers may want to turn these two separate systems into one ...... but they shouldn't

https://www.pennseparator.com/

MJCronin
Sr. Process Engineer

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources