×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
• Talk With Other Members
• Be Notified Of Responses
• Keyword Search
Favorite Forums
• Automated Signatures
• Best Of All, It's Free!

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

#### Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

# Sanitary Sewer Capacity Equation

## Sanitary Sewer Capacity Equation

(OP)
I'm reviewing new developments for sanitary sewers. Usually I've seen sanitary sewer analyzed by capacity, using mannings (pretty simple). But I have a developer providing computation for an existing over capacity pipe section. They are providing inlet water surface and max water surface elevation and stating "while under capacity per mannings equation, HGL computation shows that HGL stays below the crown of the pipe, there fore the section of existing pipe is adequate. How can it be adequate if the pipe section is under capacity per mannings? I'm new to pipe design review. Any help is appreciated

### RE: Sanitary Sewer Capacity Equation

The developer is developing an alternative reality to advocate a less expensive (to the developer) solution. Recommend that you stand firm and reject.

### RE: Sanitary Sewer Capacity Equation

What is your role in this?
If you are in the design approval role then reject the design. The mannings equation approach is well tried and adopted.

Regards
Ashtree
"Any water can be made potable if you filter it through enough money"

### RE: Sanitary Sewer Capacity Equation

By the time that pipe is overloaded, the developer will be long gone.
Is this work done to a municipality's standards? They're going to own the system when the developer sells off the last unit. It seems like they would not deviate from manning's.

### RE: Sanitary Sewer Capacity Equation

(OP)
I’m working under a P.e. And we are the approving authority for the municipality. I usually meet with our P.e. To discuss the developments but it is not due for a while. I just did not understand how you can argue the surface outlet water elevation if the mannings show the pipe section can not handle the flow from the new development. I wasn’t sure how the water elevation could even be mathematically related to capacity. Unfortunately our municipality is behind and we do not have a set design standard that developers can use. They usually follow other nearby justifications design standard. Thanks for all the help.

### RE: Sanitary Sewer Capacity Equation

generally accepted practice for sanitary sewer design in the US is to use the Mannings equation. Normal depth provides a basic estimate of the capacity and Mannings can be used with appropriate manhole and junction losses to generate a water surface and hydraulic grade line which would more accurately show the flow condition in the pipe. It sounds like your developer engineer is either
1) trying to pull a fast one or
b) does not understand basic hydraulics

### RE: Sanitary Sewer Capacity Equation

It's been a while, but I think 10 States, which is adopted in most US states, mandates Manning's.

### RE: Sanitary Sewer Capacity Equation

I will take a crack at this…

It sounds to me like the developer's engineer is claiming that simply maintaining open channel flow in the sewer is sufficient justification to call the pipe "under capacity". Let's say his(?) calculations show a depth ratio of 90% at the estimated future peak flow. Yes, the pipe would be flowing as an open channel under these conditions, but it would have precious little reserve capacity before entering the undesirable surcharge flow regime. This is important because the estimated future peak flow is just that, an estimate. Actual future peak flows might exceed that estimate, which is why having reserve open channel flow capacity is so important for sewers and storm drains.

Let's also say that your agency has a requirement for this size pipe to not exceed a depth ratio of 50%. Obviously still open channel flow, but with a much greater reserve capacity. So, while his "design" maintains open channel flow at the estimated peak, his "design" violates your agency's requirements and provides far too little reserve capacity. Thus, his design is rejected and he is forced to eat liver and onions for a month.

As an aside, back in the mid-1980s, I modeled about four miles of a City of Los Angeles trunk sewer and its watershed as part of a study evaluating a proposed service area swap with an adjacent special district. I noticed that the City's sewer design criteria was not nearly as conservative as I was used to seeing. I don't remember the exact numbers, but it went something like this: instead of requiring a max depth ratio of 50% up to 18", then 67% up to 24", and 75% above that, the City was using something like 50% up to 12", then 67% up to 18", and 75% above that. I asked one of the City's engineers about it and he told me that because the area I was studying was gradually transitioning from single-family to multi-family, and they had a pretty good handle on what the actual peak flows would be, the City decided (probably with pressure from developers) to liberalize the design criteria in this watershed rather than require upsizing miles of pipes and tearing up miles of roads. In this case, the City determined that cutting into their reserve capacity made more engineering and economic sense.

--Fred

==========
"Is it the only lesson of history that mankind is unteachable?"
--Winston S. Churchill

### RE: Sanitary Sewer Capacity Equation

(OP)
fel3, I think you've nailed it. Talking with some other engineers at other municipalities, the consultant decided to show that the depth of flow is still under capacity for their proposed upstream development. I was told as long as the HGL is contained in the pipe, then theoretically you can claim the pipe has enough capacity even though mannings equations shows "Q" being over capacity. I still have a few days to make a decision, but honestly it still does not make sense of how mannings can show over capacity, but the HGL is still "contained". Is it because of friction loss that is assumed in the HGL computations?

### RE: Sanitary Sewer Capacity Equation

no
if a mannings normal depth shows it being over capacity (say over 90%), then the HGL calculation will likely show it to be slightly higher since it takes into consideration the manhole and junction losses downstream which are additional head losses not considered in a normal depth calculation for a pipe. again, it does not sound to me like they have a good handle on the hydraulics. since you are approving the design, than you should be able to decide if "contained in the pipe" is acceptable.

### RE: Sanitary Sewer Capacity Equation

Sewers are usually designed for full flow at the peak hour. Most municipalities do not require reserve capacity. The following statement is typical:

"All sewers shall be designed and constructed to give mean velocities, when flowing full, of not less than 2.0 feet per second (0.6 m/s), based on Manning's formula."

#### Quote (arodgers1986 (Civil/Environmental) )

But I have a developer providing computation for an existing over capacity pipe section.

Is this over capacity statement based on witnessing of the sewer flows or is it a deign calculation?

### RE: Sanitary Sewer Capacity Equation

bimr…

Around here (my experience is in southern and central California), every agency I have dealt with requires handling the design peak flow at well less than full, starting with a max depth ratio of 50% for smaller pipes (the cut-off varies), then allowing a bit more depth for larger pipes, and a bit more for even larger pipes. BTW, These requirements are for dedicated sanitary sewers, not combined sewers, which we have very little of here.

arodgers1986…

The HGL can be maintained within the pipe and the pipe can still be over capacity. This occurs when "over capacity" is defined by regulation (e.g. my 50%, 67%, etc examples) and not by just the raw hydraulics.

Fred

==========
"Is it the only lesson of history that mankind is unteachable?"
--Winston S. Churchill

#### Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

#### Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Close Box

# Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

• Talk To Other Members
• Notification Of Responses To Questions
• Favorite Forums One Click Access
• Keyword Search Of All Posts, And More...

Register now while it's still free!